I want to get IQueryable<>
result when executing stored procedure.
我想在执行存储过程时获得IQueryable <>结果。
Here is peace of code that works fine:
这是代码的和平工作正常:
IQueryable<SomeEntitiy> someEntities;
var globbalyFilteredSomeEntities =
from se in m_Entities.SomeEntitiy
where
se.GlobalFilter == 1234
select se;
I can use this to apply global filter, and later use result in such way
我可以使用它来应用全局过滤器,然后以这种方式使用结果
result = globbalyFilteredSomeEntities
.OrderByDescending(se => se.CreationDate)
.Skip(500)
.Take(10);
What I want to do - use some stored procedures in global filter.
I tried:
我想做什么 - 在全局过滤器中使用一些存储过程。我试过了:
Add stored procedure to m_Entities
, but it returns IEnumerable<>
and executes sp immediately:
将存储过程添加到m_Entities,但它返回IEnumerable <>并立即执行sp:
var globbalyFilteredSomeEntities =
from se in m_Entities.SomeEntitiyStoredProcedure(1234);
Materialize query using EFExtensions library, but it is IEnumerable<>
.
If I use AsQueryable()
and OrderBy()
, Skip()
, Take()
and after that ToList()
to execute that query -
I get exception that DataReader
is open and I need to close it first(can't paste error - it is in russian).
使用EFExtensions库实现查询,但它是IEnumerable <>。如果我使用AsQueryable()和OrderBy(),Skip(),Take()并在ToList()之后执行该查询 - 我得到DataReader打开的异常,我需要先关闭它(不能粘贴错误 - 这是俄语)。
var globbalyFilteredSomeEntities =
m_Entities.CreateStoreCommand("exec SomeEntitiyStoredProcedure(1234)")
.Materialize<SomeEntitiy>();
//.AsQueryable()
//.OrderByDescending(se => se.CreationDate)
//.Skip(500)
//.Take(10)
//.ToList();
Also just skipping .AsQueryable()
is not helpful - same exception.
When I put ToList()
query executes,
but it is too expensive to execute query without Skip()
, Take()
.
也只是跳过.AsQueryable()没有用 - 同样的例外。当我执行ToList()查询时,如果没有Skip(),Take()执行查询太昂贵了。
3 个解决方案
#1
8
You can't do what you're trying to do, for the same reason that you can't put a stored procedure in a FROM clause of a SELECT query - SQL isn't built to support this kind of operation.
您无法执行您要执行的操作,原因与您无法将存储过程放在SELECT查询的FROM子句中相同 - SQL不是为支持此类操作而构建的。
Could you put the logic you want into a view instead of a stored procedure?
你能把你想要的逻辑放到视图而不是存储过程吗?
#2
1
You can use a project I created called LinqToAnything which lets you take a non-queryable data access method and turn it into an IQueryable.
您可以使用我创建的名为LinqToAnything的项目,该项目允许您使用不可查询的数据访问方法并将其转换为IQueryable。
I've got a blog post here on how to use it.
我在这里有关于如何使用它的博客文章。
#3
-1
sually you can get around these issues with ToList()
sually你可以解决ToList()的这些问题
var globbalyFilteredSomeEntities = m_Entities.CreateStoreCommand("exec SomeEntitiyStoredProcedure(1234)")
.Materialize<SomeEntitiy>()
.ToList() // <<-- added this.
.WhateverYouWant();
Why can't you do the Skip() and Take() on the enumerable? Doing this will only download the results that are skipped or taken, the others won't be read.
为什么你不能对可枚举的Skip()和Take()做?执行此操作只会下载跳过或拍摄的结果,其他结果将不会被读取。
Edit: The previous version was plain wrong in many aspects.
编辑:以前的版本在很多方面都是完全错误的。
#1
8
You can't do what you're trying to do, for the same reason that you can't put a stored procedure in a FROM clause of a SELECT query - SQL isn't built to support this kind of operation.
您无法执行您要执行的操作,原因与您无法将存储过程放在SELECT查询的FROM子句中相同 - SQL不是为支持此类操作而构建的。
Could you put the logic you want into a view instead of a stored procedure?
你能把你想要的逻辑放到视图而不是存储过程吗?
#2
1
You can use a project I created called LinqToAnything which lets you take a non-queryable data access method and turn it into an IQueryable.
您可以使用我创建的名为LinqToAnything的项目,该项目允许您使用不可查询的数据访问方法并将其转换为IQueryable。
I've got a blog post here on how to use it.
我在这里有关于如何使用它的博客文章。
#3
-1
sually you can get around these issues with ToList()
sually你可以解决ToList()的这些问题
var globbalyFilteredSomeEntities = m_Entities.CreateStoreCommand("exec SomeEntitiyStoredProcedure(1234)")
.Materialize<SomeEntitiy>()
.ToList() // <<-- added this.
.WhateverYouWant();
Why can't you do the Skip() and Take() on the enumerable? Doing this will only download the results that are skipped or taken, the others won't be read.
为什么你不能对可枚举的Skip()和Take()做?执行此操作只会下载跳过或拍摄的结果,其他结果将不会被读取。
Edit: The previous version was plain wrong in many aspects.
编辑:以前的版本在很多方面都是完全错误的。