I am new to Kotlin and really worried whether I am writing proper syntax or not. I have a super class and I want to write a generic abstract function as below.
我是Kotlin的新手并且非常担心我是否正在编写正确的语法。我有一个超类,我想写一个通用的抽象函数,如下所示。
abstract class A {
abstract fun <T> getText() : Test<T>
}
class B : A() {
override fun <T> getText(): Test<T> {
return Test1() // Error - Required Test<T>, found Test1
}
}
class C : A() {
override fun <T> getText(): Test<T> {
return Test2() // Error - Required Test<T>, found Test2
}
}
class Test1 : Test<String>() {
}
class Test2 : Test<Int>() {
}
Can I solve this kind of problem with some sort of proper syntax. I guess I am doing some mistake? Can anybody please help?
我可以用某种正确的语法解决这类问题吗?我猜我做错了吗?有人可以帮忙吗?
3 个解决方案
#1
3
This is the answer you're looking for:
这是您正在寻找的答案:
abstract class A<T> {
abstract fun getText() : Test<T>
}
class B : A<String>() {
override fun getText(): Test<String> = Test1()
}
class C : A<Int>() {
override fun getText(): Test<Int> = Test2()
}
class Test1 : Test<String>()
class Test2 : Test<Int>()
open class Test<T>
You just need to move parameter T
from the method signature to the class.
您只需将参数T从方法签名移动到类。
Bonus: I updated the above snippet to more idiomatic Kotlin
额外奖励:我将上述片段更新为更加惯用的Kotlin
#2
3
What you're doing cannot be correct, because it would allow the following code:
你正在做的事情是不正确的,因为它将允许以下代码:
val test: Test<Int> = B().getText()
B().getText()
tries to return Test1()
, which is Test<String>
. But because the return type can be anything, its valid. This breaks the type system.
B()。getText()尝试返回Test1(),即Test
#3
2
You likely want to enforce the type from the class rather than the method, due to Kiskae's example.
由于Kiskae的例子,您可能希望从类而不是方法强制执行类型。
For example:
例如:
abstract class A<T> {
abstract fun getText() : Test<T>
}
can be extended using
可以使用扩展
class B : A<String>() ...
which will match the type for Test1
这将匹配Test1的类型
#1
3
This is the answer you're looking for:
这是您正在寻找的答案:
abstract class A<T> {
abstract fun getText() : Test<T>
}
class B : A<String>() {
override fun getText(): Test<String> = Test1()
}
class C : A<Int>() {
override fun getText(): Test<Int> = Test2()
}
class Test1 : Test<String>()
class Test2 : Test<Int>()
open class Test<T>
You just need to move parameter T
from the method signature to the class.
您只需将参数T从方法签名移动到类。
Bonus: I updated the above snippet to more idiomatic Kotlin
额外奖励:我将上述片段更新为更加惯用的Kotlin
#2
3
What you're doing cannot be correct, because it would allow the following code:
你正在做的事情是不正确的,因为它将允许以下代码:
val test: Test<Int> = B().getText()
B().getText()
tries to return Test1()
, which is Test<String>
. But because the return type can be anything, its valid. This breaks the type system.
B()。getText()尝试返回Test1(),即Test
#3
2
You likely want to enforce the type from the class rather than the method, due to Kiskae's example.
由于Kiskae的例子,您可能希望从类而不是方法强制执行类型。
For example:
例如:
abstract class A<T> {
abstract fun getText() : Test<T>
}
can be extended using
可以使用扩展
class B : A<String>() ...
which will match the type for Test1
这将匹配Test1的类型