为什么我可以在std::map中使用const char*作为键

时间:2021-07-25 18:55:42

I have define a data structure

我定义了一个数据结构

std::map<std::string, int> a;

I found I can pass const char* as key, like this:

我发现我可以把const char*作为key,如下所示:

a["abc"] = 1;

Which function provides automatic type conversion from const char* to std::string?

哪个函数提供从const char*到std::string的自动类型转换?

4 个解决方案

#1


15  

std::string has a constructor that allows the implicit conversion from const char*.

string有一个构造函数,它允许从const char*隐式转换。

basic_string( const CharT* s,
              const Allocator& alloc = Allocator() );

means that an implicit conversion such as

表示隐式转换,如

std::string s = "Hello";

is allowed.

是被允许的。

It is the equivalent of doing something like

这相当于做一些类似的事情

struct Foo
{
  Foo() {}
  Foo(int) {} // implicit converting constructor.
};

Foo f1 = 42;
Foo f2;
f2 = 33 + 9;

If you wanted to disallow the implicit conversion construction, you mark the constructor as explicit:

如果您希望不允许隐式转换构造,您可以将构造函数标记为显式:

struct Foo 
{
  explicit Foo(int) {}
};

Foo f = 33+9; // error
Foo f(33+9); // OK
f = Foo(33+9); // OK

#2


4  

There is a constructor for std::string which takes const char* as a parameter.

std::string有一个构造函数,它以const char*作为参数。

string::string(const char*);

Unless the constructor is declared explicit then the compiler will apply one use defined conversion if needed to call any function.

除非构造函数被声明为显式,否则编译器将在需要调用任何函数时应用一个定义的转换。

#3


3  

See string constructor. The constructor provides the conversion for the key in your map. It's equivalent to

看到字符串构造函数。构造函数为映射中的键提供转换。它等于

a[std::string("abc")] = 1;

#4


2  

In C++ if you make a class constructor that only takes one parameter, then (unless you tell it otherwise with explicit), that parameter's type will be implicitly convertable to your class.

在c++中,如果您创建的类构造函数只接受一个参数,那么(除非您用显式的方式告诉它),该参数的类型将隐式地可转换到您的类。

std::string has such a constructor for char *

string有这样一个char *的构造函数

Yes, this can cause some unexpected behavior on occasion. This is why you generally should put explicit on single-parameter constructors, unless you really want these silent conversions.

是的,这有时会导致一些意想不到的行为。这就是为什么您通常应该在单参数构造函数上使用显式构造函数,除非您确实需要这些静默转换。

#1


15  

std::string has a constructor that allows the implicit conversion from const char*.

string有一个构造函数,它允许从const char*隐式转换。

basic_string( const CharT* s,
              const Allocator& alloc = Allocator() );

means that an implicit conversion such as

表示隐式转换,如

std::string s = "Hello";

is allowed.

是被允许的。

It is the equivalent of doing something like

这相当于做一些类似的事情

struct Foo
{
  Foo() {}
  Foo(int) {} // implicit converting constructor.
};

Foo f1 = 42;
Foo f2;
f2 = 33 + 9;

If you wanted to disallow the implicit conversion construction, you mark the constructor as explicit:

如果您希望不允许隐式转换构造,您可以将构造函数标记为显式:

struct Foo 
{
  explicit Foo(int) {}
};

Foo f = 33+9; // error
Foo f(33+9); // OK
f = Foo(33+9); // OK

#2


4  

There is a constructor for std::string which takes const char* as a parameter.

std::string有一个构造函数,它以const char*作为参数。

string::string(const char*);

Unless the constructor is declared explicit then the compiler will apply one use defined conversion if needed to call any function.

除非构造函数被声明为显式,否则编译器将在需要调用任何函数时应用一个定义的转换。

#3


3  

See string constructor. The constructor provides the conversion for the key in your map. It's equivalent to

看到字符串构造函数。构造函数为映射中的键提供转换。它等于

a[std::string("abc")] = 1;

#4


2  

In C++ if you make a class constructor that only takes one parameter, then (unless you tell it otherwise with explicit), that parameter's type will be implicitly convertable to your class.

在c++中,如果您创建的类构造函数只接受一个参数,那么(除非您用显式的方式告诉它),该参数的类型将隐式地可转换到您的类。

std::string has such a constructor for char *

string有这样一个char *的构造函数

Yes, this can cause some unexpected behavior on occasion. This is why you generally should put explicit on single-parameter constructors, unless you really want these silent conversions.

是的,这有时会导致一些意想不到的行为。这就是为什么您通常应该在单参数构造函数上使用显式构造函数,除非您确实需要这些静默转换。