I just want to know why this doesn't work (I am trying to name the ducklings from a book: Jack, Kack, Lack, Mack, Nack, Ouack, Pack, Quack) Note: Quack and Ouack have a U
我只是想知道为什么这不起作用(我试图从一本书中给小鸭子起名:Jack,Kack,Lack,Mack,Nack,Ouack,Pack,Quack)注意:Quack和Ouack有一个U
prefixes = 'JKLMNOPQ'
suffix = 'ack'
for letter in prefixes:
if letter != 'O' or 'Q': #I know this doesn't work, need to know alternative
print letter + suffix
else:
print letter + 'u' + suffix
3 个解决方案
#1
7
You likely mean this:
你可能是这个意思:
if letter != 'O' or letter != 'Q':
The result of your original statement,
原始陈述的结果,
if letter != 'O' or 'Q':
compared letter
to the result of 'O' or 'Q'
, which is a boolean (true to be exact) (so you could see why this comparison would always be true as it was).
将字母与'O'或'Q'的结果进行比较,这是一个布尔值(确切地说是真的)(所以你可以看到为什么这种比较总是如此)。
#2
5
Please note that
请注意
if letter != 'O' or 'Q':
is in fact
实际上是
if (letter != 'O') or 'Q':
That is probably not what you wanted.
那可能不是你想要的。
Just a small test on top of it:
只是一个小测试:
>>> True != False or True
True
>>> (True != False) or True
True
>>> True != (False or True)
False
Note: This means that the answer marked on top is not true, letter is not compared to the result of O or Q...
注意:这意味着顶部标记的答案不正确,字母不与O或Q的结果进行比较...
#3
2
Python is not COBOL or some other language which supports this syntax. As a start I would suggest you read Expressions.
Python不是COBOL或其他支持此语法的语言。首先,我建议你阅读表达式。
Now coming back to your problem, what you expect from the statement
现在回到你的问题,你对该声明的期望
if letter != 'O' or 'Q':
definitely
无疑
if letter != 'O' or letter != 'Q':
interestingly Python allows you to think laterally. For example you might also say,
有趣的是,Python允许你横向思考。例如,你也可以说,
letter not in ['O','Q']
or simply
或简单地说
letter not in 'OQ': #In Python Notation
or can be more expressive like
或者可以更具表现力
if all(letter != x for x in 'OQ'):
Just compare the above mentioned syntax and usage with yours
只需将上述语法和用法与您的语法和用法进行比较
When you wrote
你写的时候
if letter != 'O' or 'Q':
which in Python should be written as
在Python中应该写成
if letter not in 'OQ':
or may even be
甚至可能是
if all(letter != x for x in 'OQ'):
#1
7
You likely mean this:
你可能是这个意思:
if letter != 'O' or letter != 'Q':
The result of your original statement,
原始陈述的结果,
if letter != 'O' or 'Q':
compared letter
to the result of 'O' or 'Q'
, which is a boolean (true to be exact) (so you could see why this comparison would always be true as it was).
将字母与'O'或'Q'的结果进行比较,这是一个布尔值(确切地说是真的)(所以你可以看到为什么这种比较总是如此)。
#2
5
Please note that
请注意
if letter != 'O' or 'Q':
is in fact
实际上是
if (letter != 'O') or 'Q':
That is probably not what you wanted.
那可能不是你想要的。
Just a small test on top of it:
只是一个小测试:
>>> True != False or True
True
>>> (True != False) or True
True
>>> True != (False or True)
False
Note: This means that the answer marked on top is not true, letter is not compared to the result of O or Q...
注意:这意味着顶部标记的答案不正确,字母不与O或Q的结果进行比较...
#3
2
Python is not COBOL or some other language which supports this syntax. As a start I would suggest you read Expressions.
Python不是COBOL或其他支持此语法的语言。首先,我建议你阅读表达式。
Now coming back to your problem, what you expect from the statement
现在回到你的问题,你对该声明的期望
if letter != 'O' or 'Q':
definitely
无疑
if letter != 'O' or letter != 'Q':
interestingly Python allows you to think laterally. For example you might also say,
有趣的是,Python允许你横向思考。例如,你也可以说,
letter not in ['O','Q']
or simply
或简单地说
letter not in 'OQ': #In Python Notation
or can be more expressive like
或者可以更具表现力
if all(letter != x for x in 'OQ'):
Just compare the above mentioned syntax and usage with yours
只需将上述语法和用法与您的语法和用法进行比较
When you wrote
你写的时候
if letter != 'O' or 'Q':
which in Python should be written as
在Python中应该写成
if letter not in 'OQ':
or may even be
甚至可能是
if all(letter != x for x in 'OQ'):