I would like a clean way in .html.erb to loop through a variable ONLY if the variable is not nil.
如果变量不是nil,我想在.html.erb中以干净的方式循环遍历变量。
I would like the following to execute but not if @family is nil.
如果@family为nil,我希望执行以下操作。
<% @family.children.each.with_index(1) do |family_member, index| %>
// HTML HERE
<% end %>
I am trying to avoid doing something like this
我试图避免做这样的事情
<% if @family %>
<% @family.children.each.with_index(1) do |family_member, index| %>
// HTML HERE
<% end %>
<% end %>
And especially trying to avoid needing
特别是试图避免需要
<% if @family && @family.children %>
<% @family.children.each.with_index(1) do |family_member, index| %>
// HTML HERE
<% end %>
<% end %>
Is there a better way to do this?
有一个更好的方法吗?
5 个解决方案
#1
5
This solution can be misleading but Ruby's syntax allows you to do so:
这个解决方案可能会产生误导,但Ruby的语法允许您这样做:
<% @family.children.each.with_index(1) do |family_member, index| %>
// HTML HERE
<% end unless @family.blank? %>
# ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
I only use this solution for simple statements like testing the presence of an object (like in your case). I do not recommend this solution for a more complex logic because a third party would not know that the condition is at the end of the block.
我只将此解决方案用于简单的语句,例如测试对象的存在(就像你的情况一样)。我不推荐这种解决方案用于更复杂的逻辑,因为第三方不知道条件是在块的末尾。
Another one:
另一个:
<% (@family.try(:children) || []).each.with_index(1) do |family_member, index| %>
# mu-is-too-short's (brilliant) suggestion:
<% @family.try(:children).to_a.each.with_index(1) do |family_member, index| %>
If @family
is nil
, the try(:children)
won't raise an error but will return nil
, then nil || []
returns the empty array which "you can loop on it" (loop on it zero times actually).
如果@family为nil,则try(:children)不会引发错误,但会返回nil,然后是nil || []返回“你可以在它上面循环”的空数组(实际上循环为零)。
#2
5
You could use a Null Object, something like:
您可以使用Null对象,例如:
class NullFamily
def children
[]
end
end
In your controller:
在你的控制器中:
@family = some_finder || NullFamily.new
Or you could pass a separate variable @children
:
或者你可以传递一个单独的变量@children:
@family = some_finder
@children = @family.try(:children).to_a
And change your loop to:
并将您的循环更改为:
<% @children.each.with_index(1) do |family_member, index| %>
// HTML HERE
<% end %>
#3
4
How about this:
这个怎么样:
<% @family && @family.children.each.with_index(1) do |family_member, index| %>
// HTML HERE
<% end %>
#4
1
Maybe you can have this in your controller?
也许你可以在控制器中拥有它?
@family ||= []
#5
0
You can use if @family.present? or the opposite as unless @family.blank?
您可以使用if @ family.present吗?或者相反,除非@ family.blank?
#1
5
This solution can be misleading but Ruby's syntax allows you to do so:
这个解决方案可能会产生误导,但Ruby的语法允许您这样做:
<% @family.children.each.with_index(1) do |family_member, index| %>
// HTML HERE
<% end unless @family.blank? %>
# ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
I only use this solution for simple statements like testing the presence of an object (like in your case). I do not recommend this solution for a more complex logic because a third party would not know that the condition is at the end of the block.
我只将此解决方案用于简单的语句,例如测试对象的存在(就像你的情况一样)。我不推荐这种解决方案用于更复杂的逻辑,因为第三方不知道条件是在块的末尾。
Another one:
另一个:
<% (@family.try(:children) || []).each.with_index(1) do |family_member, index| %>
# mu-is-too-short's (brilliant) suggestion:
<% @family.try(:children).to_a.each.with_index(1) do |family_member, index| %>
If @family
is nil
, the try(:children)
won't raise an error but will return nil
, then nil || []
returns the empty array which "you can loop on it" (loop on it zero times actually).
如果@family为nil,则try(:children)不会引发错误,但会返回nil,然后是nil || []返回“你可以在它上面循环”的空数组(实际上循环为零)。
#2
5
You could use a Null Object, something like:
您可以使用Null对象,例如:
class NullFamily
def children
[]
end
end
In your controller:
在你的控制器中:
@family = some_finder || NullFamily.new
Or you could pass a separate variable @children
:
或者你可以传递一个单独的变量@children:
@family = some_finder
@children = @family.try(:children).to_a
And change your loop to:
并将您的循环更改为:
<% @children.each.with_index(1) do |family_member, index| %>
// HTML HERE
<% end %>
#3
4
How about this:
这个怎么样:
<% @family && @family.children.each.with_index(1) do |family_member, index| %>
// HTML HERE
<% end %>
#4
1
Maybe you can have this in your controller?
也许你可以在控制器中拥有它?
@family ||= []
#5
0
You can use if @family.present? or the opposite as unless @family.blank?
您可以使用if @ family.present吗?或者相反,除非@ family.blank?