I have a hash, say:
我有一个散列,说:
hash1 ={1=>"a",2=>"b",3=>"c",4=>"d"}
and an array, say:
一个数组,说:
arr=[2,3]
and I have to find a resultant hash like:
我需要找到一个合成哈希,比如
hash2={2="b",3=>"c"}
That is, the resultant hash must contain only those key-value pairs whose keys are present in the given array. Is it possible to do this without a loop?
也就是说,生成的散列必须只包含键值对,其键值在给定数组中。有没有可能做到这一点而不做一个循环?
5 个解决方案
#1
7
The following will do what you want but is destructive to the original hash1
.
下面的代码将执行您想要的操作,但是对原始的hash1是破坏性的。
hash2 = hash1.keep_if {|k,v| arr.include? k}
The following will do what you want but keeps hash1
as it originally was.
下面将执行您想要的操作,但是保持hash1与原来一样。
hash2 = hash1.select {|k,v| arr.include? k}
#2
4
hash1.select {|k,v| arr.member? k} # {2=>"b", 3=>"c"}
#3
2
Are you looking for something like this?
你在找这样的东西吗?
1.9.3p392 :001 > hash1 ={1=>"a",2=>"b",3=>"c",4=>"d"}
=> {1=>"a", 2=>"b", 3=>"c", 4=>"d"}
1.9.3p392 :002 > arr=[2,3]
=> [2, 3]
1.9.3p392 :003 > hash2 = hash1.keep_if{|key, value| arr.include?(key)}
=> {2=>"b", 3=>"c"}
I know you said no loop, but this is as much close as I could get
我知道你说没有环路,但这是我能得到的最接近的
#4
1
Benchmark for all answers so far:
迄今为止所有答案的基准:
require 'fruity'
hash1 = Hash[[*1..10000].zip[*1.10000]]
arr = 1.upto(1000).select(&:odd?)
compare do
keep_if_include do
hash2 = hash1.dup.keep_if {|k,v| arr.include? k}
end
values_at_zip do
hash2 = Hash[arr.zip(hash1.dup.values_at(*arr))]
end
select_member do
hash2 = hash1.dup.select {|k,v| arr.member? k}
end
end
Results:
结果:
Running each test 4096 times. Test will take about 17 seconds.
select_member is faster than keep_if_include by 2x ± 0.1
keep_if_include is faster than values_at_zip by 410x ± 100.0
#5
1
if you are using rails, try
如果您正在使用rails,请尝试
hash2 = hash1.sliec(*arr)
if you are just using ruby, try this
如果您只是在使用ruby,那么试试这个
hash2 = hash1.select {|k, v| arr.include?(k) }
#1
7
The following will do what you want but is destructive to the original hash1
.
下面的代码将执行您想要的操作,但是对原始的hash1是破坏性的。
hash2 = hash1.keep_if {|k,v| arr.include? k}
The following will do what you want but keeps hash1
as it originally was.
下面将执行您想要的操作,但是保持hash1与原来一样。
hash2 = hash1.select {|k,v| arr.include? k}
#2
4
hash1.select {|k,v| arr.member? k} # {2=>"b", 3=>"c"}
#3
2
Are you looking for something like this?
你在找这样的东西吗?
1.9.3p392 :001 > hash1 ={1=>"a",2=>"b",3=>"c",4=>"d"}
=> {1=>"a", 2=>"b", 3=>"c", 4=>"d"}
1.9.3p392 :002 > arr=[2,3]
=> [2, 3]
1.9.3p392 :003 > hash2 = hash1.keep_if{|key, value| arr.include?(key)}
=> {2=>"b", 3=>"c"}
I know you said no loop, but this is as much close as I could get
我知道你说没有环路,但这是我能得到的最接近的
#4
1
Benchmark for all answers so far:
迄今为止所有答案的基准:
require 'fruity'
hash1 = Hash[[*1..10000].zip[*1.10000]]
arr = 1.upto(1000).select(&:odd?)
compare do
keep_if_include do
hash2 = hash1.dup.keep_if {|k,v| arr.include? k}
end
values_at_zip do
hash2 = Hash[arr.zip(hash1.dup.values_at(*arr))]
end
select_member do
hash2 = hash1.dup.select {|k,v| arr.member? k}
end
end
Results:
结果:
Running each test 4096 times. Test will take about 17 seconds.
select_member is faster than keep_if_include by 2x ± 0.1
keep_if_include is faster than values_at_zip by 410x ± 100.0
#5
1
if you are using rails, try
如果您正在使用rails,请尝试
hash2 = hash1.sliec(*arr)
if you are just using ruby, try this
如果您只是在使用ruby,那么试试这个
hash2 = hash1.select {|k, v| arr.include?(k) }