Consider this class:
考虑这个课程:
package be.duo.test;
public class Main {
public static void main(String[] args) {
Main main = new Main();
main.execute();
}
private void execute() {
for(int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
System.out.println("" + method());
}
}
private int method() {
return (Math.random() > 0.5d) ? 1 : null;
}
}
The method() has return type int
, which is a primitive type.
method()的返回类型为int,它是一种基本类型。
Consider the ternary operator used in the return statement:
考虑return语句中使用的三元运算符:
- it compiles with the Java 8 default compiler, but this will result in a NullPointerException at runtime, why?
- using Maven this will result in a compile time error
它用Java 8默认编译器编译,但这会在运行时导致NullPointerException,为什么?
使用Maven会导致编译时错误
[ERROR] error: incompatible types: bad type in conditional expression
[ERROR] <null> cannot be converted to int
Can somebody explain to me why it behaves different?
有人可以向我解释为什么它表现不同吗?
2 个解决方案
#1
As far as I can tell, it should be legal under Java 8.
据我所知,它应该在Java 8下合法。
See Table 15.25-E. Conditional expression type (Reference 3rd operand, Part III):
见表15.25-E。条件表达式类型(参考第3操作数,第III部分):
3rd → null
2nd ↓
int lub(Integer,null)
lub(Integer,null)
should be Integer
. Basically if you have a conditional of the form boolean ? int : null
, the result of the expression should be Integer
and it gets unboxed. (I think you already know this is what happens.)
lub(整数,null)应该是Integer。基本上如果你有一个布尔形式的条件? int:null,表达式的结果应该是Integer并且它被取消装箱。 (我想你已经知道这是发生了什么。)
So according to the specification it should be the same.
所以根据规范它应该是相同的。
Seems like a compiler bug. There have been quite a few of these found, I would say try updating to the newest version.
看起来像编译器错误。已经发现了不少这些,我会说尝试更新到最新版本。
#2
Not sure which Java 8 minor version you use, but i can compile under java 1.8.
不确定您使用的是哪个Java 8次要版本,但我可以在java 1.8下编译。
C:\Users\XXXX>javac -version
javac 1.8.0_31
C:\Users\XXXX>javac Main.java
C:\Users\XXXX>java Main
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NullPointerException
at Main.method(Main.java:15)
at Main.execute(Main.java:10)
at Main.main(Main.java:5)
#1
As far as I can tell, it should be legal under Java 8.
据我所知,它应该在Java 8下合法。
See Table 15.25-E. Conditional expression type (Reference 3rd operand, Part III):
见表15.25-E。条件表达式类型(参考第3操作数,第III部分):
3rd → null
2nd ↓
int lub(Integer,null)
lub(Integer,null)
should be Integer
. Basically if you have a conditional of the form boolean ? int : null
, the result of the expression should be Integer
and it gets unboxed. (I think you already know this is what happens.)
lub(整数,null)应该是Integer。基本上如果你有一个布尔形式的条件? int:null,表达式的结果应该是Integer并且它被取消装箱。 (我想你已经知道这是发生了什么。)
So according to the specification it should be the same.
所以根据规范它应该是相同的。
Seems like a compiler bug. There have been quite a few of these found, I would say try updating to the newest version.
看起来像编译器错误。已经发现了不少这些,我会说尝试更新到最新版本。
#2
Not sure which Java 8 minor version you use, but i can compile under java 1.8.
不确定您使用的是哪个Java 8次要版本,但我可以在java 1.8下编译。
C:\Users\XXXX>javac -version
javac 1.8.0_31
C:\Users\XXXX>javac Main.java
C:\Users\XXXX>java Main
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NullPointerException
at Main.method(Main.java:15)
at Main.execute(Main.java:10)
at Main.main(Main.java:5)