这两个dealloc方法之间有什么区别吗?

So i'm overriding dealloc method because the object is a composite object made up of one other object.

所以我重写dealloc方法，因为对象是由另一个对象组成的复合对象。

I originally had this dealloc method:

我原来有这个dealloc方法:

-(id) dealloc; // Override to release the Rectangle object’s memory 
{
    [rect release];
    [super dealloc];
    return self;
}

After looking in the book I saw another answer:

看完书，我看到了另一个答案:

{
   [rect release];
   return [super dealloc];
}

just wondering if both work equally.

只是想知道两者是否都一样。

Thanks,

谢谢,

Nick

尼克

2 个解决方案

#1

They're both wrong. dealloc returns void, not id:

它们都是错误的。dealloc返回无效，而不是id:

- (void) dealloc {
  [rect release];
  [super dealloc];
}

#2

I have just checked the NSObject reference: dealloc has not return type. So, I think it is incorrect to define such a signature. Thus, call to dealloc should not expect a return value.

我刚刚检查了NSObject的引用:dealloc没有返回类型。所以，我认为定义这样一个签名是不正确的。因此，调用dealloc不应该期望返回值。

Unless you are not subclassing NSObject...

除非你不是子类化NSObject…

#1