使用'模板化模板'显式调用/实例化函数

时间:2022-12-05 21:40:04

Following code works fine:

以下代码工作正常:

template<typename T>
struct Wrap {};

template<template <class> class OUT, typename IN>
void Extract (OUT<IN> *obj)
{ /* only class 'IN' is used in some way */ }

int main ()
{
  Wrap<int> obj;
  Extract(&obj);
}

But, I am passing a pointer argument to extract the outer type and inner type.

但是,我传递一个指针参数来提取外部类型和内部类型。

Is there any better way by which I can invoke the method with explicit template instantiation ? Extract<Wrap<int> > ();

有没有更好的方法可以通过显式模板实例化来调用该方法?提取 >();

Edit:

I will detail my question a bit more. This explains, why the easy answer like Extract<Wrap, int>(); is not possible. I am writing a text parser, for C++ code. Wherever, parser finds,

我会详细说明我的问题。这解释了为什么像Extract ()这样的简单答案;不可能。我正在为C ++代码编写一个文本解析器。无论在何处,解析器发现, ,int>

x = (Type) y; 

it should convert into,

它应该转换成,

x = Extract<Type> (y);

Now, the Type can be

现在,Type可以

  1. any normal type like, int* or A**
  2. 任何正常类型,如int *或A **

  3. some templatized template like Wrap<A>
  4. 一些模板化的模板,如Wrap

Now, Extract() works different for both the cases. I have to figure out using template that, whether it's Extract<int*> or Extract<Wrap<int> >.

现在,Extract()对两种情况都有不同的作用。我必须弄清楚使用模板,无论是Extract 还是Extract >。

==> In simpler language, the method can be called:

==>在更简单的语言中,可以调用该方法:

  1. Extract<int*>()
  2. Extract<Wrap<int> >()

I can figure out if it's called in 1st case, but how can I figure out if it's called in 2nd case ? (provided that, I want to know internal type also).

我可以弄清楚它是否在第一种情况下被调用,但是如何判断它是否在第二种情况下被调用? (前提是,我也想知道内部类型)。

2 个解决方案

#1


0  

How about Extract<Wrap, int> (&obj);?

如何提取 (&obj);? ,int>

But why do you want to specify it explicitly? Most of the time you'd rather have the compiler deduce the types for you automatically for simplicity.

但是为什么要明确指定它呢?大多数情况下,为了简单起见,您宁愿让编译器为您自动推断出类型。

EDIT: Have you considered just specializing for Wrap<U>?

编辑:您是否考虑过专攻Wrap?U?

#include <iostream>

template<typename T>
struct Wrap {};

template <class T>
struct Foo
{
static void Extract()
{
    std::cout << "Base type" << std::endl;
    // Stuff
}
};

template <class U>
struct Foo<Wrap<U> >
{
static void Extract()
{
    std::cout << "Extract<Wrap<U> >" << std::endl;
    // Stuff for Wrap
}
};

int main ()
{
  Foo<int>::Extract();
  Foo<Wrap<int> >::Extract ();
}

If needed you can add a specialization for T* as well.

如果需要,您也可以为T *添加专业化。

#2


0  

This works fine

这很好用

template<typename T>
struct Wrap {};

template<template <class> class OUT, typename IN>
void Extract ()
{
    IN x; // IN => int
} 

int main ()
{
  Wrap<int> obj;
  Extract<Wrap, int>();
}

You certainly lack basic understanding of C++ templates. Read the book C++ Templates - The Complete Guide.

你当然缺乏对C ++模板的基本理解。阅读“C ++模板 - 完整指南”一书。

#1


0  

How about Extract<Wrap, int> (&obj);?

如何提取 (&obj);? ,int>

But why do you want to specify it explicitly? Most of the time you'd rather have the compiler deduce the types for you automatically for simplicity.

但是为什么要明确指定它呢?大多数情况下,为了简单起见,您宁愿让编译器为您自动推断出类型。

EDIT: Have you considered just specializing for Wrap<U>?

编辑:您是否考虑过专攻Wrap?U?

#include <iostream>

template<typename T>
struct Wrap {};

template <class T>
struct Foo
{
static void Extract()
{
    std::cout << "Base type" << std::endl;
    // Stuff
}
};

template <class U>
struct Foo<Wrap<U> >
{
static void Extract()
{
    std::cout << "Extract<Wrap<U> >" << std::endl;
    // Stuff for Wrap
}
};

int main ()
{
  Foo<int>::Extract();
  Foo<Wrap<int> >::Extract ();
}

If needed you can add a specialization for T* as well.

如果需要,您也可以为T *添加专业化。

#2


0  

This works fine

这很好用

template<typename T>
struct Wrap {};

template<template <class> class OUT, typename IN>
void Extract ()
{
    IN x; // IN => int
} 

int main ()
{
  Wrap<int> obj;
  Extract<Wrap, int>();
}

You certainly lack basic understanding of C++ templates. Read the book C++ Templates - The Complete Guide.

你当然缺乏对C ++模板的基本理解。阅读“C ++模板 - 完整指南”一书。