Users Table:
用户表:
+-----------+----------+------------+-------------+
| name | fb_id | date | flipbook |
+-----------+----------+------------+-------------+
| Tia | 66783722 | 1975-09-18 | june 2014 |
| Nikki | 10438259 | 1972-03-04 | july 2014 |
| Yamila | 73370629 | 1972-03-04 | august 2014 |
+-----------+----------+------------+-------------+
Visits Table:
访问表:
+-----------+----------+------------+-------------+
| Name | fb_id | Date | Flipbook |
+-----------+----------+------------+-------------+
| Tia | 66783722 | 1975-09-18 | june 2014 |
| Nikki | 10438259 | 1972-03-04 | august 2014 |
| Nikki | 10438259 | 1972-04-04 | october 2014|
+-----------+----------+------------+-------------+
I want the query to return all users from from user Table and count the number of flipbooks, for example:
我希望查询从用户表返回所有用户,并计算flipbooks的数量,例如:
[1]
name => Tia,
fb_id = 66783722,
date => 1975-09-18,
count_flip => 1 (june 2014 is in both tables so we count it as 1)
[2]
name => Nikki,
fb_id = 10438259,
date => 1972-03-04,
count_flip => 3 (because in the first table we have june 2014 and in the second table we have august 2014 and october 2014, so no duplicates)
[3]
name => Yamila,
fb_id = 73370629,
date => 1972-03-04,
count_flip => 1 (because we have august 2014 in the first table and she is not mentioned in the second one)
I tryed to do this query:
我试图做这个查询:
SELECT u.*, (SELECT COUNT(Distinct flipbook) FROM visits v WHERE v.fb_id = u.fb_id) as count_flip FROM users u
But the problem is I am missing the users that are in the users table but not in the visits table. So for the example above I wouldn't see "Yamila" in my query.
但问题是我缺少的是用户表中的用户,而不是访问表中的用户。因此,对于上面的示例,我在查询中看不到“Yamila”。
Any thoughts how to fix this?
有什么想法吗?
2 个解决方案
#1
1
Another way of thinking about the logic is that you want to count 1 for the users table and then add up all non-matching flipbook values for the name
in the visits
table. This suggests a correlated subquery:
考虑逻辑的另一种方式是,您希望为users表计数1,然后为visit表中的名称添加所有不匹配的flipbook值。这就提出了相关子查询:
select u.*,
(select 1 + count(*)
from visits v
where v.name = u.name and v.flipbook <> u.flipbook
) as nr
from users u;
EDIT:
编辑:
Another way to do what you want is less efficient (assuming you have the right indexes for the above query):
另一种做你想做的事情的方法是效率较低(假设你对上述查询有正确的索引):
select u.*, uv.nr
from users u join
(select u.name, count(distinct flipbook) as nr
from ((select name, flipbook from users) union all
(select name, flipbook from visits)
) uv
group by u.name
) uv
on u.name = uv.name;
#2
1
I think you can just do this:-
我想你可以这么做:-
SELECT users.name, users.fb_id, users.date, COUNT(DISTINCT visits.Flipbook) + 1 AS count_flip
FROM users
LEFT OUTER JOIN visits
ON users.fb_id = visits.fb_id
AND users.flipbook != visits.flipbook
GROUP BY users.name, users.fb_id, users.date
Does a LEFT OUTER JOIN to get a row for each matching user with a different date. Then just ad one to the resulting count (to count the original field on the users table).
为每个匹配的用户提供一个不同的日期的左外连接。然后,仅将一个ad映射到结果计数(以计算users表上的原始字段)。
This avoids any sub queries.
这避免了任何子查询。
#1
1
Another way of thinking about the logic is that you want to count 1 for the users table and then add up all non-matching flipbook values for the name
in the visits
table. This suggests a correlated subquery:
考虑逻辑的另一种方式是,您希望为users表计数1,然后为visit表中的名称添加所有不匹配的flipbook值。这就提出了相关子查询:
select u.*,
(select 1 + count(*)
from visits v
where v.name = u.name and v.flipbook <> u.flipbook
) as nr
from users u;
EDIT:
编辑:
Another way to do what you want is less efficient (assuming you have the right indexes for the above query):
另一种做你想做的事情的方法是效率较低(假设你对上述查询有正确的索引):
select u.*, uv.nr
from users u join
(select u.name, count(distinct flipbook) as nr
from ((select name, flipbook from users) union all
(select name, flipbook from visits)
) uv
group by u.name
) uv
on u.name = uv.name;
#2
1
I think you can just do this:-
我想你可以这么做:-
SELECT users.name, users.fb_id, users.date, COUNT(DISTINCT visits.Flipbook) + 1 AS count_flip
FROM users
LEFT OUTER JOIN visits
ON users.fb_id = visits.fb_id
AND users.flipbook != visits.flipbook
GROUP BY users.name, users.fb_id, users.date
Does a LEFT OUTER JOIN to get a row for each matching user with a different date. Then just ad one to the resulting count (to count the original field on the users table).
为每个匹配的用户提供一个不同的日期的左外连接。然后,仅将一个ad映射到结果计数(以计算users表上的原始字段)。
This avoids any sub queries.
这避免了任何子查询。