String、StringBuilder、StringBuffer对比

时间:2021-11-30 20:53:54

参考:http://swiftlet.net/archives/1694

http://www.cnblogs.com/springcsc/archive/2009/12/03/1616326.html

String  字符串(character strings),不是线程安全的

StringBuilder  非线程安全的字符串序列(A mutable sequence of characters)

StringBuffer  线程安全的字符串序列(A thread-safe, mutable sequence of characters)

1、初始化方式

  String    

String str="abc";
String str1=new String("abc");

  这两种初始化的方式的差别是:后者产生了两个对象,内存浪费。

  StringBuffer

StringBuffer sb1=new StringBuffer("abc");
StringBuffer sbf1=new StringBuffer();
sbf1.append("abc");

  从源码上没看出来这两种的明显差异。有老司机明白的可以指点一二。

  StringBuilder

  和StringBuffer的初始化方式是一样的。

2、性能比较

  测试代码  

package cn.simple.src_study;

public class StringStudy {
public static void main(String[] args) {
long strStart = System.currentTimeMillis();
for (int i = 0; i < 10000; i++) { String str = "abc";
}
long strEnd = System.currentTimeMillis();
System.out.println("str=\"abc\"; 执行10000次耗时:" + (strEnd - strStart)); long strStart1 = System.currentTimeMillis();
for (int i = 0; i < 10000; i++) { String str1 = new String("abc");
}
long strEnd1 = System.currentTimeMillis();
System.out.println("str=new String(\"abc\"); 执行10000次耗时:" + (strEnd1 - strStart1)); long sbfStart = System.currentTimeMillis();
for (int i = 0; i < 10000; i++) { StringBuffer sbf = new StringBuffer("abc");
}
long sbfEnd = System.currentTimeMillis();
System.out.println("sbf=new StringBuffer(\"abc\"); 执行10000次耗时:" + (sbfEnd - sbfStart)); long sbfStart1 = System.currentTimeMillis();
for (int i = 0; i < 10000; i++) {
StringBuffer sbf1 = new StringBuffer();
sbf1.append("abc");
}
long sbfEnd1 = System.currentTimeMillis();
System.out.println("sbf.append(\"abc\"); 执行10000次耗时:" + (sbfEnd1 - sbfStart1)); long sbdStart = System.currentTimeMillis();
for (int i = 0; i < 10000; i++) {
StringBuilder sbd = new StringBuilder("abc");
}
long sbdEnd = System.currentTimeMillis();
System.out.println("sbd=new StringBuilder(\"abc\"); 执行10000次耗时:" + (sbdEnd - sbdStart)); long sbdStart1 = System.currentTimeMillis();
for (int i = 0; i < 10000; i++) {
StringBuilder sbd = new StringBuilder();
sbd.append("abc");
}
long sbdEnd1 = System.currentTimeMillis();
System.out.println("sbd.append(\"abc\"); 执行10000次耗时:" + (sbdEnd1 - sbdStart1)); }
}

  结果截图

String、StringBuilder、StringBuffer对比

  从测试结果可以看出:如果值是固定的直接赋值给字符串,效率最高。

  如果字符串存在拼接过程呢?

  测试代码:

package cn.simple.src_study;

public class StringStudy2 {
public static void main(String[] args) {
long strStart = System.currentTimeMillis();
for (int i = 0; i < 10000; i++) { String str = "abc";
str+="def";
}
long strEnd = System.currentTimeMillis();
System.out.println("str=\"abc\"; 执行10000次耗时:" + (strEnd - strStart)); long strStart1 = System.currentTimeMillis();
for (int i = 0; i < 10000; i++) { String str1 = new String("abc");
str1+="edf";
}
long strEnd1 = System.currentTimeMillis();
System.out.println("str=new String(\"abc\"); 执行10000次耗时:" + (strEnd1 - strStart1)); long sbfStart = System.currentTimeMillis();
for (int i = 0; i < 10000; i++) { StringBuffer sbf = new StringBuffer("abc");
sbf.append("edf");
}
long sbfEnd = System.currentTimeMillis();
System.out.println("sbf=new StringBuffer(\"abc\"); 执行10000次耗时:" + (sbfEnd - sbfStart)); long sbfStart1 = System.currentTimeMillis();
for (int i = 0; i < 10000; i++) {
StringBuffer sbf1 = new StringBuffer();
sbf1.append("abc");
sbf1.append("edf");
}
long sbfEnd1 = System.currentTimeMillis();
System.out.println("sbf.append(\"abc\"); 执行10000次耗时:" + (sbfEnd1 - sbfStart1)); long sbdStart = System.currentTimeMillis();
for (int i = 0; i < 10000; i++) {
StringBuilder sbd = new StringBuilder("abc");
sbd.append("edf");
}
long sbdEnd = System.currentTimeMillis();
System.out.println("sbd=new StringBuilder(\"abc\"); 执行10000次耗时:" + (sbdEnd - sbdStart)); long sbdStart1 = System.currentTimeMillis();
for (int i = 0; i < 10000; i++) {
StringBuilder sbd = new StringBuilder();
sbd.append("abc");
sbd.append("edf");
}
long sbdEnd1 = System.currentTimeMillis();
System.out.println("sbd.append(\"abc\"); 执行10000次耗时:" + (sbdEnd1 - sbdStart1)); }
}

  测试结果:

String、StringBuilder、StringBuffer对比

  从测试结果可以看出:存在字符串拼接的情况下性能StringBuilder>StringBuffer>String