Is the sole difference between boost::scoped_ptr<T> and std::unique_ptr<T> the fact that std::unique_ptr<T> has move semantics whereas boost::scoped_ptr<T> is just a get/reset smart pointer?
唯一的区别是boost::scoped_ptr
2 个解决方案
#1
38
No, but that is the most important difference.
不，但那是最重要的区别。
The other major difference is that unique_ptr can have a destructor object with it, similarly to how shared_ptr can. Unlike shared_ptr, the destructor type is part of the unique_ptr's type (the way allocators are part of STL container types).
另一个主要区别是unique_ptr可以有一个析构函数对象，就像shared_ptr可以那样。与shared_ptr不同，析构函数类型是unique_ptr类型的一部分(分配器是STL容器类型的一部分)。
#2
25
unique_ptr owns an object exclusively.It is non-copyable but supports transfer-of-ownership. It was introduced as replacement for the now deprecated auto_ptr.
unique_ptr只拥有一个对象。它是不可复制的，但支持所有权的转移。它被引入作为已废弃的auto_ptr的替代品。
scoped_ptr is neither copyable nor movable. It is the preferred choice when you want to make sure pointers are deleted when going out of scope.
scoped_ptr既不可复制也不可移动。当您想要确保指针在超出范围时被删除时，这是首选。
#1
38
No, but that is the most important difference.
不，但那是最重要的区别。
The other major difference is that unique_ptr can have a destructor object with it, similarly to how shared_ptr can. Unlike shared_ptr, the destructor type is part of the unique_ptr's type (the way allocators are part of STL container types).
另一个主要区别是unique_ptr可以有一个析构函数对象，就像shared_ptr可以那样。与shared_ptr不同，析构函数类型是unique_ptr类型的一部分(分配器是STL容器类型的一部分)。
#2
25
unique_ptr owns an object exclusively.It is non-copyable but supports transfer-of-ownership. It was introduced as replacement for the now deprecated auto_ptr.
unique_ptr只拥有一个对象。它是不可复制的，但支持所有权的转移。它被引入作为已废弃的auto_ptr的替代品。
scoped_ptr is neither copyable nor movable. It is the preferred choice when you want to make sure pointers are deleted when going out of scope.
scoped_ptr既不可复制也不可移动。当您想要确保指针在超出范围时被删除时，这是首选。