Adding more than one child to a WPF StatusBar
results in poor layout with little option to customize. For example, this code:
在WPF StatusBar中添加多个子元素会导致糟糕的布局,几乎没有定制的选项。例如,这段代码:
<Window x:Class="StatusBar.MainWindow"
xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml/presentation"
xmlns:x="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml"
Title="MainWindow" Height="350" Width="525">
<DockPanel>
<StatusBar DockPanel.Dock="Bottom">
<StatusBarItem>
<TextBlock>Ready</TextBlock>
</StatusBarItem>
<StatusBarItem>
<TextBlock>Set</TextBlock>
</StatusBarItem>
</StatusBar>
<Label>Main Content</Label>
</DockPanel>
</Window>
Results in:
结果:
This is not the ideal layout, since the "Set" is squeezed right up against the "Ready".
这并不是理想的布局,因为“集合”被压缩到“就绪”。
How do I gain full control over the layout of the WPF StatusBar
control?
如何获得对WPF状态栏控件布局的完全控制?
3 个解决方案
#1
74
By default, the StatusBar
uses a DockPanel
to position its children. This works fine for one item, but tends to make things messy and inconvenient when working with more than one child.
默认情况下,StatusBar使用DockPanel定位其子元素。这对于一个项目来说是可行的,但是当与多个孩子一起工作时,会使事情变得混乱和不方便。
To gain a high level of control over the positioning of status bar children, you can swap out the DockPanel
for a Grid
:
要获得对状态栏子节点的高度控制,您可以将DockPanel替换为一个网格:
<Window x:Class="StatusBar.MainWindow"
xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml/presentation"
xmlns:x="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml"
Title="MainWindow" Height="350" Width="525">
<DockPanel>
<StatusBar DockPanel.Dock="Bottom">
<StatusBar.ItemsPanel>
<ItemsPanelTemplate>
<Grid>
<Grid.RowDefinitions>
<RowDefinition Height="*"/>
</Grid.RowDefinitions>
<Grid.ColumnDefinitions>
<ColumnDefinition Width="4*"/>
<ColumnDefinition Width="Auto"/>
<ColumnDefinition Width="*"/>
<ColumnDefinition Width="*"/>
</Grid.ColumnDefinitions>
</Grid>
</ItemsPanelTemplate>
</StatusBar.ItemsPanel>
<StatusBarItem>
<TextBlock>Ready</TextBlock>
</StatusBarItem>
<StatusBarItem Grid.Column="1">
<ProgressBar Value="30" Width="80" Height="18"/>
</StatusBarItem>
<StatusBarItem Grid.Column="2">
<TextBlock>Set</TextBlock>
</StatusBarItem>
<StatusBarItem Grid.Column="3">
<TextBlock>Go!</TextBlock>
</StatusBarItem>
</StatusBar>
<Label>Main Content</Label>
</DockPanel>
</Window>
This results in:
这将导致:
For a more in-depth discussion, please visit my blog post here.
想要更深入的讨论,请访问我的博客。
#2
11
Actually, following Kent's reply I tried this and it works fine:
事实上,在肯特的回复之后,我尝试了这个方法,效果很好:
<StatusBar>
<StatusBarItem DockPanel.Dock="Right">
<TextBlock>Go!</TextBlock>
</StatusBarItem>
<StatusBarItem DockPanel.Dock="Right">
<TextBlock>Set</TextBlock>
</StatusBarItem>
<StatusBarItem DockPanel.Dock="Right">
<ProgressBar Value="30" Width="80" Height="18"/>
</StatusBarItem>
<!-- Fill last child is true by default -->
<StatusBarItem>
<TextBlock>Ready</TextBlock>
</StatusBarItem>
</StatusBar>
#3
1
Just for the sake of reference for those reading the excellent answers above I'd like to suggest something even more simpler that achieves the same results. (Using neither DockPanel
nor StatusBar
).
为了给阅读以上优秀答案的人提供参考,我想建议一些更简单的方法来达到同样的结果。(不使用DockPanel或StatusBar)。
<Window>
.
.
<Grid Margin="2">
<Grid.RowDefinitions>
<RowDefinition Height="*"/>
<RowDefinition Height="15"/>
</Grid.RowDefinitions>
<SomeContainer Grid.Row="0" /> <!-- Main Content.. -->
<Grid Grid.Row="1">
<!-- Status bar laid out here (using similar approach)-->
</Grid>
</Window>
Disclaimer : This was long ago at a time when I was starting out with WPF.
免责声明:这是很久以前的事了,当时我刚开始使用WPF。
#1
74
By default, the StatusBar
uses a DockPanel
to position its children. This works fine for one item, but tends to make things messy and inconvenient when working with more than one child.
默认情况下,StatusBar使用DockPanel定位其子元素。这对于一个项目来说是可行的,但是当与多个孩子一起工作时,会使事情变得混乱和不方便。
To gain a high level of control over the positioning of status bar children, you can swap out the DockPanel
for a Grid
:
要获得对状态栏子节点的高度控制,您可以将DockPanel替换为一个网格:
<Window x:Class="StatusBar.MainWindow"
xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml/presentation"
xmlns:x="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml"
Title="MainWindow" Height="350" Width="525">
<DockPanel>
<StatusBar DockPanel.Dock="Bottom">
<StatusBar.ItemsPanel>
<ItemsPanelTemplate>
<Grid>
<Grid.RowDefinitions>
<RowDefinition Height="*"/>
</Grid.RowDefinitions>
<Grid.ColumnDefinitions>
<ColumnDefinition Width="4*"/>
<ColumnDefinition Width="Auto"/>
<ColumnDefinition Width="*"/>
<ColumnDefinition Width="*"/>
</Grid.ColumnDefinitions>
</Grid>
</ItemsPanelTemplate>
</StatusBar.ItemsPanel>
<StatusBarItem>
<TextBlock>Ready</TextBlock>
</StatusBarItem>
<StatusBarItem Grid.Column="1">
<ProgressBar Value="30" Width="80" Height="18"/>
</StatusBarItem>
<StatusBarItem Grid.Column="2">
<TextBlock>Set</TextBlock>
</StatusBarItem>
<StatusBarItem Grid.Column="3">
<TextBlock>Go!</TextBlock>
</StatusBarItem>
</StatusBar>
<Label>Main Content</Label>
</DockPanel>
</Window>
This results in:
这将导致:
For a more in-depth discussion, please visit my blog post here.
想要更深入的讨论,请访问我的博客。
#2
11
Actually, following Kent's reply I tried this and it works fine:
事实上,在肯特的回复之后,我尝试了这个方法,效果很好:
<StatusBar>
<StatusBarItem DockPanel.Dock="Right">
<TextBlock>Go!</TextBlock>
</StatusBarItem>
<StatusBarItem DockPanel.Dock="Right">
<TextBlock>Set</TextBlock>
</StatusBarItem>
<StatusBarItem DockPanel.Dock="Right">
<ProgressBar Value="30" Width="80" Height="18"/>
</StatusBarItem>
<!-- Fill last child is true by default -->
<StatusBarItem>
<TextBlock>Ready</TextBlock>
</StatusBarItem>
</StatusBar>
#3
1
Just for the sake of reference for those reading the excellent answers above I'd like to suggest something even more simpler that achieves the same results. (Using neither DockPanel
nor StatusBar
).
为了给阅读以上优秀答案的人提供参考,我想建议一些更简单的方法来达到同样的结果。(不使用DockPanel或StatusBar)。
<Window>
.
.
<Grid Margin="2">
<Grid.RowDefinitions>
<RowDefinition Height="*"/>
<RowDefinition Height="15"/>
</Grid.RowDefinitions>
<SomeContainer Grid.Row="0" /> <!-- Main Content.. -->
<Grid Grid.Row="1">
<!-- Status bar laid out here (using similar approach)-->
</Grid>
</Window>
Disclaimer : This was long ago at a time when I was starting out with WPF.
免责声明:这是很久以前的事了,当时我刚开始使用WPF。