If I define tables a
and b
as follows:
如果我按如下方式定义表a和b:
CREATE TABLE a(i integer);
ALTER TABLE a ADD CONSTRAINT pkey_a PRIMARY KEY (i);
CREATE TABLE b(j integer);
ALTER TABLE b add CONSTRAINT fkey_ij FOREIGN KEY (j)
REFERENCES a (i) MATCH SIMPLE
ON UPDATE CASCADE ON DELETE CASCADE;
INSERT INTO a(i) VALUES(1);
And then do the following:
然后执行以下操作:
START TRANSACTION;
SET CONSTRAINTS ALL DEFERRED;
INSERT INTO b(j) VALUES(2);
INSERT INTO a(i) VALUES(2);
COMMIT;
It produces the error below. Why is SET CONSTRAINTS
not having the desired effect?
它产生以下错误。为什么SET CONSTRAINTS没有达到预期效果?
ERROR: insert or update on table "b" violates foreign key constraint "fkey_ij"
SQL state: 23503 Detail: Key (j)=(2) is not present in table "a".错误:表“b”上的插入或更新违反外键约束“fkey_ij”SQL状态:23503详细信息:表(a)中不存在键(j)=(2)。
1 个解决方案
#1
10
For starters, only DEFERRABLE
constraints can be deferred.
对于初学者,只能推迟DEFERRABLE约束。
But that won't help your case because, FK constraints cannot be bent this way at all. Per documentation:
但这对你的情况没有帮助,因为FK约束根本不能这样弯曲。每个文件:
Referential actions other than the
NO ACTION
check cannot be deferred, even if the constraint is declared deferrable.即使约束被声明为可延迟,也不能延迟除NO ACTION检查以外的参照动作。
Reverse the sequence of your INSERT
statements.
反转INSERT语句的顺序。
Related:
有关:
- Constraint defined DEFERRABLE INITIALLY IMMEDIATE is still DEFERRED?
- 约束定义DEFERRABLE INTITIALLY IMMEDIATE仍然是DEFERRED?
#1
10
For starters, only DEFERRABLE
constraints can be deferred.
对于初学者,只能推迟DEFERRABLE约束。
But that won't help your case because, FK constraints cannot be bent this way at all. Per documentation:
但这对你的情况没有帮助,因为FK约束根本不能这样弯曲。每个文件:
Referential actions other than the
NO ACTION
check cannot be deferred, even if the constraint is declared deferrable.即使约束被声明为可延迟,也不能延迟除NO ACTION检查以外的参照动作。
Reverse the sequence of your INSERT
statements.
反转INSERT语句的顺序。
Related:
有关:
- Constraint defined DEFERRABLE INITIALLY IMMEDIATE is still DEFERRED?
- 约束定义DEFERRABLE INTITIALLY IMMEDIATE仍然是DEFERRED?