How can I write below sql query in linq
如何在linq中编写下面的sql查询
select * from Product where ProductTypePartyID IN
(
select Id from ProductTypeParty where PartyId = 34
)
4 个解决方案
#1
3
Syntactic variations aside, you can write it in practically the same way.
除了语法变化之外,您可以用几乎相同的方式编写它。
from p in ctx.Product
where (from ptp in ctx.ProductTypeParty
where ptp.PartyId == 34
select ptp.Id).Contains(p.ProductTypePartyID)
select p
I prefer using the existential quantifier, though:
我更喜欢使用存在量词,但是:
from p in ctx.Product
where (from ptp in ctx.ProductTypeParty
where ptp.PartyId == 34
&& ptp.Id == p.ProductTypePartyID).Any()
select p
I expect that this form will resolve to an EXISTS (SELECT * ...)
in the generated SQL.
我希望这个表单将解析为生成的SQL中的EXISTS(SELECT * ...)。
You'll want to profile both, in case there's a big difference in performance.
如果性能有很大差异,您需要对两者进行分析。
#2
6
There is no direct equivalent in LINQ. Instead you can use contains () or any other trick to implement them. Here's an example that uses Contains
:
在LINQ中没有直接的等价物。相反,您可以使用contains()或任何其他技巧来实现它们。这是一个使用Contains的示例:
String [] s = new String [5];
s [0] = "34";
s [1] = "12";
s [2] = "55";
s [3] = "4";
s [4] = "61";
var result = from d in context.TableName
where s.Contains (d.fieldname)
select d;
check this link for details: in clause Linq
有关详细信息,请查看此链接:in Linq
int[] productList = new int[] { 1, 2, 3, 4 };
var myProducts = from p in db.Products
where productList.Contains(p.ProductID)
select p;
#3
1
Something similar to this
类似的东西
var partyProducts = from p in dbo.Product
join pt in dbo.ProductTypeParty on p.ProductTypePartyID equal pt.PartyId
where pt.PartyId = 34
select p
#4
1
You use the Contains in a Where clause.
您在Where子句中使用Contains。
Something along these lines (untested):
沿着这些方向的东西(未经测试):
var results = Product.Where(product => ProductTypeParty
.Where(ptp => ptp.PartyId == 34)
.Select(ptp => ptp.Id)
.Contains(product.Id)
);
#1
3
Syntactic variations aside, you can write it in practically the same way.
除了语法变化之外,您可以用几乎相同的方式编写它。
from p in ctx.Product
where (from ptp in ctx.ProductTypeParty
where ptp.PartyId == 34
select ptp.Id).Contains(p.ProductTypePartyID)
select p
I prefer using the existential quantifier, though:
我更喜欢使用存在量词,但是:
from p in ctx.Product
where (from ptp in ctx.ProductTypeParty
where ptp.PartyId == 34
&& ptp.Id == p.ProductTypePartyID).Any()
select p
I expect that this form will resolve to an EXISTS (SELECT * ...)
in the generated SQL.
我希望这个表单将解析为生成的SQL中的EXISTS(SELECT * ...)。
You'll want to profile both, in case there's a big difference in performance.
如果性能有很大差异,您需要对两者进行分析。
#2
6
There is no direct equivalent in LINQ. Instead you can use contains () or any other trick to implement them. Here's an example that uses Contains
:
在LINQ中没有直接的等价物。相反,您可以使用contains()或任何其他技巧来实现它们。这是一个使用Contains的示例:
String [] s = new String [5];
s [0] = "34";
s [1] = "12";
s [2] = "55";
s [3] = "4";
s [4] = "61";
var result = from d in context.TableName
where s.Contains (d.fieldname)
select d;
check this link for details: in clause Linq
有关详细信息,请查看此链接:in Linq
int[] productList = new int[] { 1, 2, 3, 4 };
var myProducts = from p in db.Products
where productList.Contains(p.ProductID)
select p;
#3
1
Something similar to this
类似的东西
var partyProducts = from p in dbo.Product
join pt in dbo.ProductTypeParty on p.ProductTypePartyID equal pt.PartyId
where pt.PartyId = 34
select p
#4
1
You use the Contains in a Where clause.
您在Where子句中使用Contains。
Something along these lines (untested):
沿着这些方向的东西(未经测试):
var results = Product.Where(product => ProductTypeParty
.Where(ptp => ptp.PartyId == 34)
.Select(ptp => ptp.Id)
.Contains(product.Id)
);