void *stackAddr[NUM_THREADS];
stackAddr[i] = malloc(STACKSIZE);
The compiler (g++ 4.4.3) complains where the malloc is called...
编译器(g ++ 4.4.3)抱怨调用malloc的地方......
warning: pointer of type ‘void *’ used in arithmetic
error: ‘void*’ is not a pointer-to-object type
If you are interested in seeing the whole code, here it goes...
如果你有兴趣看到整个代码,这里就是......
#include <pthread.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <math.h>
#define NUM_THREADS 4
void *stackAddr[NUM_THREADS];
pthread_t thread[NUM_THREADS];
pthread_attr_t attr;
void *BusyWork(void *t)
{
int i;
long tid;
double result=0.0;
tid = (long)t;
printf("Thread %ld starting...\n",tid);
for ( i = 0; i < 1000; i++)
{
result = result + sin(i*tid) * tan(i*tid);
}
printf("Thread %ld done. Result = %e\n", tid, result);
pthread_exit((void*) t);
}
void pthread_create_with_stack( pthread_t * pthread, void *(*start_routine) (void *), int tid )
{
const size_t STACKSIZE = 0xC00000; //12582912
void *stackAddr;
int rc;
size_t i;
pthread_t thread;
pid_t pid;
stackAddr[tid] = malloc(STACKSIZE); // Error here!
pthread_attr_setstack(&attr, stackAddr[tid], STACKSIZE);
rc = pthread_create( pthread, &attr, start_routine, (void*)tid );
}
int main (int argc, char *argv[])
{
int rc;
long t;
void *status;
/* Initialize and set thread detached attribute */
pthread_attr_init(&attr);
pthread_attr_setdetachstate(&attr, PTHREAD_CREATE_JOINABLE);
for(t=0; t<NUM_THREADS; t++)
{
printf("Main: creating thread %ld\n", t);
rc = pthread_create_with_stack(&thread[t], BusyWork, t);
if (rc)
{
printf("ERROR; return code from pthread_create() is %d\n", rc);
exit(-1);
}
}
/* Free attribute and wait for the other threads */
pthread_attr_destroy(&attr);
for(t=0; t<NUM_THREADS; t++)
{
rc = pthread_join(thread[t], &status);
if (rc)
{
printf("ERROR; return code from pthread_join() is %d\n", rc);
exit(-1);
}
printf("Main: completed join with thread %ld having a status"
"of %ld\n",t,(long)status);
}
printf("Main: program completed. Exiting.\n");
pthread_exit(NULL);
}
7 个解决方案
#1
12
You are declaring a local variable void *stackAddr
, which shadows the global stackAddr
array.
您正在声明一个局部变量void * stackAddr,它会影响全局stackAddr数组。
Moreover, it is not an array, and applying the []
subscript operator attempts to offset and dereference a void
pointer, hence the compile error.
此外,它不是一个数组,并且应用[]下标运算符会尝试偏移和取消引用void指针,因此编译错误。
Dereferencing and pointer-arithmetic on void pointers is not permitted by the standard since sizeof(void)
is undefined.
标准不允许对void指针进行解引用和指针运算,因为sizeof(void)未定义。
#2
4
You messed up your declaration:
你搞砸了你的声明:
void *stackAddr;
should be:
void *stackAddr[];
(You may also need to set a size for the array.)
(您可能还需要为数组设置大小。)
Then you try to do this:
然后你尝试这样做:
stackAddr[tid] = malloc(STACKSIZE);
So you're accessing an array element of a void*
.
所以你正在访问void *的数组元素。
#3
2
Now you've posted the real code, I'm guessing the error is in pthread_create_with_stack
, where you have a local variable void * stackAddr
that hides the global array.
现在你发布了真正的代码,我猜错误是在pthread_create_with_stack中,你有一个隐藏全局数组的局部变量void * stackAddr。
It looks like you should just remove the local variable.
看起来你应该删除局部变量。
#4
2
What you posted first, is not a problem.
你首先发布的,不是问题。
void *stackAddr[NUM_THREADS];
But in the code you have something else:
但在代码中你还有别的东西:
void *stackAddr;
so the compiler tries to use that local variable, and of course fails to compile..
所以编译器尝试使用该局部变量,当然无法编译..
#5
2
In pthread_create_with_stack
, you have this code:
在pthread_create_with_stack中,您有以下代码:
void *stackAddr;
...
stackAddr[tid] = malloc(STACKSIZE)
The expression stackAddr[tid]
tries to do arithmetic on a void*
.
表达式stackAddr [tid]尝试对void *进行算术运算。
#6
0
In C++ void pointers have no attributes, that includes size. As a result, you cannot calculate the offset address for i-number voids from the beginning of the array. It is the specification of a particular index in the array is causing your math issues.
在C ++中,void指针没有属性,包括大小。因此,您无法从数组的开头计算i-number空洞的偏移地址。它是数组中特定索引的规范导致数学问题。
#7
0
In the version you posted, stackAddr
isn't an array, yet you're assigning to stackAddr[tid]
. The compiler replaces this with *(stackAddr + tid)
with the parenthetical expression evaluating to stackAddr + tid * sizeof(void)
, so the compiler warns you about sizeof(void)
.
在您发布的版本中,stackAddr不是数组,但您要分配给stackAddr [tid]。编译器将*(stackAddr + tid)替换为使用括号表达式求值为stackAddr + tid * sizeof(void),因此编译器会向您发出有关sizeof(void)的警告。
#1
12
You are declaring a local variable void *stackAddr
, which shadows the global stackAddr
array.
您正在声明一个局部变量void * stackAddr,它会影响全局stackAddr数组。
Moreover, it is not an array, and applying the []
subscript operator attempts to offset and dereference a void
pointer, hence the compile error.
此外,它不是一个数组,并且应用[]下标运算符会尝试偏移和取消引用void指针,因此编译错误。
Dereferencing and pointer-arithmetic on void pointers is not permitted by the standard since sizeof(void)
is undefined.
标准不允许对void指针进行解引用和指针运算,因为sizeof(void)未定义。
#2
4
You messed up your declaration:
你搞砸了你的声明:
void *stackAddr;
should be:
void *stackAddr[];
(You may also need to set a size for the array.)
(您可能还需要为数组设置大小。)
Then you try to do this:
然后你尝试这样做:
stackAddr[tid] = malloc(STACKSIZE);
So you're accessing an array element of a void*
.
所以你正在访问void *的数组元素。
#3
2
Now you've posted the real code, I'm guessing the error is in pthread_create_with_stack
, where you have a local variable void * stackAddr
that hides the global array.
现在你发布了真正的代码,我猜错误是在pthread_create_with_stack中,你有一个隐藏全局数组的局部变量void * stackAddr。
It looks like you should just remove the local variable.
看起来你应该删除局部变量。
#4
2
What you posted first, is not a problem.
你首先发布的,不是问题。
void *stackAddr[NUM_THREADS];
But in the code you have something else:
但在代码中你还有别的东西:
void *stackAddr;
so the compiler tries to use that local variable, and of course fails to compile..
所以编译器尝试使用该局部变量,当然无法编译..
#5
2
In pthread_create_with_stack
, you have this code:
在pthread_create_with_stack中,您有以下代码:
void *stackAddr;
...
stackAddr[tid] = malloc(STACKSIZE)
The expression stackAddr[tid]
tries to do arithmetic on a void*
.
表达式stackAddr [tid]尝试对void *进行算术运算。
#6
0
In C++ void pointers have no attributes, that includes size. As a result, you cannot calculate the offset address for i-number voids from the beginning of the array. It is the specification of a particular index in the array is causing your math issues.
在C ++中,void指针没有属性,包括大小。因此,您无法从数组的开头计算i-number空洞的偏移地址。它是数组中特定索引的规范导致数学问题。
#7
0
In the version you posted, stackAddr
isn't an array, yet you're assigning to stackAddr[tid]
. The compiler replaces this with *(stackAddr + tid)
with the parenthetical expression evaluating to stackAddr + tid * sizeof(void)
, so the compiler warns you about sizeof(void)
.
在您发布的版本中,stackAddr不是数组,但您要分配给stackAddr [tid]。编译器将*(stackAddr + tid)替换为使用括号表达式求值为stackAddr + tid * sizeof(void),因此编译器会向您发出有关sizeof(void)的警告。