I am using coredata so I need sort descriptors for my entities
我正在使用coredata,所以我需要为我的实体排序描述符
For example, a Coordinate-entity has this class func:
例如,一个协调实体拥有这个类func:
class func sortDescriptors() -> Array<NSSortDescriptor>
{
return [NSSortDescriptor(key: "sequence", ascending: true)]
}
I am using this when doing fetch-requests to CoreData like this:
当我对CoreData进行这样的获取请求时,我使用了这个:
var request = NSFetchRequest(entityName: entityName)
request.sortDescriptors = T.sortDescriptors()
However, when I have an array of coordinates as a property on another coredata object, this is an NSSet (I.e. unsorted)
然而,当我在另一个coredata对象上有一个作为属性的坐标数组时,这是一个NSSet(即未排序的)
To solve this, I am returning the coordinates like this:
为了解决这个问题,我将返回这样的坐标:
return NSArray(array: coordinates!).sortedArrayUsingDescriptors(Coordinate.sortDescriptors()) as? Array<Coordinate>
Which feels ugly, to use an NSArray just to get the sortedArrayUsingDescriptors
-method. Is there a similar way to do this directly on a Swift-array, I.e. Array<Coordinate>
by using sort descriptors?
用NSArray来获取sortedarrayusingdescriptors方法,感觉很难看。是否有一种类似的方法可以直接在一个Swift-array(即数组
Thank you!
谢谢你!
3 个解决方案
#1
10
There is no built-in method for this, but you can add them using protocol extension:
对此没有内置的方法,但是可以使用协议扩展名添加:
extension MutableCollectionType where Index : RandomAccessIndexType, Generator.Element : AnyObject {
/// Sort `self` in-place using criteria stored in a NSSortDescriptors array
public mutating func sortInPlace(sortDescriptors theSortDescs: [NSSortDescriptor]) {
sortInPlace {
for sortDesc in theSortDescs {
switch sortDesc.compareObject($0, toObject: $1) {
case .OrderedAscending: return true
case .OrderedDescending: return false
case .OrderedSame: continue
}
}
return false
}
}
}
extension SequenceType where Generator.Element : AnyObject {
/// Return an `Array` containing the sorted elements of `source`
/// using criteria stored in a NSSortDescriptors array.
@warn_unused_result
public func sort(sortDescriptors theSortDescs: [NSSortDescriptor]) -> [Self.Generator.Element] {
return sort {
for sortDesc in theSortDescs {
switch sortDesc.compareObject($0, toObject: $1) {
case .OrderedAscending: return true
case .OrderedDescending: return false
case .OrderedSame: continue
}
}
return false
}
}
}
But note that this will work only when the array elements are classes, not structures, as NSSortDescriptor compareObject method requires arguments conforming to AnyObject
但是请注意,这只在数组元素是类而不是结构时才会起作用,因为NSSortDescriptor compareObject方法需要符合AnyObject的参数
#2
8
Another approach to the nice extensions of Damien could be a multi-cast.
达米安的另一种不错的扩展方式是多播。
myArray = (myArray as NSArray).sortedArrayUsingDescriptors(tableView.sortDescriptors) as! Array
Original source: NSHipster
原始资料来源:NSHipster
#3
4
Swift 3 Version of @Darniel's answer
Swift 3版本的@Darniel的回答
extension MutableCollection where Self : RandomAccessCollection {
/// Sort `self` in-place using criteria stored in a NSSortDescriptors array
public mutating func sort(sortDescriptors theSortDescs: [NSSortDescriptor]) {
sort { by:
for sortDesc in theSortDescs {
switch sortDesc.compare($0, to: $1) {
case .orderedAscending: return true
case .orderedDescending: return false
case .orderedSame: continue
}
}
return false
}
}
}
extension Sequence where Iterator.Element : AnyObject {
/// Return an `Array` containing the sorted elements of `source`
/// using criteria stored in a NSSortDescriptors array.
public func sorted(sortDescriptors theSortDescs: [NSSortDescriptor]) -> [Self.Iterator.Element] {
return sorted {
for sortDesc in theSortDescs {
switch sortDesc.compare($0, to: $1) {
case .orderedAscending: return true
case .orderedDescending: return false
case .orderedSame: continue
}
}
return false
}
}
}
#1
10
There is no built-in method for this, but you can add them using protocol extension:
对此没有内置的方法,但是可以使用协议扩展名添加:
extension MutableCollectionType where Index : RandomAccessIndexType, Generator.Element : AnyObject {
/// Sort `self` in-place using criteria stored in a NSSortDescriptors array
public mutating func sortInPlace(sortDescriptors theSortDescs: [NSSortDescriptor]) {
sortInPlace {
for sortDesc in theSortDescs {
switch sortDesc.compareObject($0, toObject: $1) {
case .OrderedAscending: return true
case .OrderedDescending: return false
case .OrderedSame: continue
}
}
return false
}
}
}
extension SequenceType where Generator.Element : AnyObject {
/// Return an `Array` containing the sorted elements of `source`
/// using criteria stored in a NSSortDescriptors array.
@warn_unused_result
public func sort(sortDescriptors theSortDescs: [NSSortDescriptor]) -> [Self.Generator.Element] {
return sort {
for sortDesc in theSortDescs {
switch sortDesc.compareObject($0, toObject: $1) {
case .OrderedAscending: return true
case .OrderedDescending: return false
case .OrderedSame: continue
}
}
return false
}
}
}
But note that this will work only when the array elements are classes, not structures, as NSSortDescriptor compareObject method requires arguments conforming to AnyObject
但是请注意,这只在数组元素是类而不是结构时才会起作用,因为NSSortDescriptor compareObject方法需要符合AnyObject的参数
#2
8
Another approach to the nice extensions of Damien could be a multi-cast.
达米安的另一种不错的扩展方式是多播。
myArray = (myArray as NSArray).sortedArrayUsingDescriptors(tableView.sortDescriptors) as! Array
Original source: NSHipster
原始资料来源:NSHipster
#3
4
Swift 3 Version of @Darniel's answer
Swift 3版本的@Darniel的回答
extension MutableCollection where Self : RandomAccessCollection {
/// Sort `self` in-place using criteria stored in a NSSortDescriptors array
public mutating func sort(sortDescriptors theSortDescs: [NSSortDescriptor]) {
sort { by:
for sortDesc in theSortDescs {
switch sortDesc.compare($0, to: $1) {
case .orderedAscending: return true
case .orderedDescending: return false
case .orderedSame: continue
}
}
return false
}
}
}
extension Sequence where Iterator.Element : AnyObject {
/// Return an `Array` containing the sorted elements of `source`
/// using criteria stored in a NSSortDescriptors array.
public func sorted(sortDescriptors theSortDescs: [NSSortDescriptor]) -> [Self.Iterator.Element] {
return sorted {
for sortDesc in theSortDescs {
switch sortDesc.compare($0, to: $1) {
case .orderedAscending: return true
case .orderedDescending: return false
case .orderedSame: continue
}
}
return false
}
}
}