获取SQL中另一列的每个值的最常用值

时间:2021-09-25 13:41:55

I have a table like this:

我有这样一张桌子:

 Column  | Type | Modifiers 
---------+------+-----------
 country | text | 
 food_id | int  | 
 eaten   | date | 

And for each country, I want to get the food that is eaten most often. The best I can think of (I'm using postgres) is:

对于每个国家,我想获得最常吃的食物。我能想到的最好的(我使用的是postgres)是:

CREATE TEMP TABLE counts AS 
   SELECT country, food_id, count(*) as count FROM munch GROUP BY country, food_id;

CREATE TEMP TABLE max_counts AS 
   SELECT country, max(count) as max_count FROM counts GROUP BY country;

SELECT country, max(food_id) FROM counts 
   WHERE (country, count) IN (SELECT * from max_counts) GROUP BY country;

In that last statement, the GROUP BY and max() are needed to break ties, where two different foods have the same count.

在最后一个陈述中,需要GROUP BY和max()来打破关系,其中两种不同的食物具有相同的数量。

This seems like a lot of work for something conceptually simple. Is there a more straight forward way to do it?

对于概念上简单的事情来说,这似乎是很多工作。有没有更直接的方式来做到这一点?

9 个解决方案

#1


13  

PostgreSQL introduced support for window functions in 8.4, the year after this question was asked. It's worth noting that it might be solved today as follows:

PostgreSQL在提出这个问题后的一年中引入了对8.4功能的窗口功能的支持。值得注意的是,今天可能会解决如下问题:

SELECT country, food_id
  FROM (SELECT country, food_id, ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY country ORDER BY freq DESC) AS rn
          FROM (  SELECT country, food_id, COUNT('x') AS freq
                    FROM country_foods
                GROUP BY 1, 2) food_freq) ranked_food_req
 WHERE rn = 1;

The above will break ties. If you don't want to break ties, you could use DENSE_RANK() instead.

以上将打破关系。如果你不想打破关系,你可以改用DENSE_RANK()。

#2


8  

SELECT DISTINCT
"F1"."food",
"F1"."country"
FROM "foo" "F1"
WHERE
"F1"."food" =
    (SELECT "food" FROM
        (
            SELECT "food", COUNT(*) AS "count"
            FROM "foo" "F2" 
            WHERE "F2"."country" = "F1"."country" 
            GROUP BY "F2"."food" 
            ORDER BY "count" DESC
        ) AS "F5"
        LIMIT 1
    )

Well, I wrote this in a hurry and didn't check it really well. The sub-select might be pretty slow, but this is shortest and most simple SQL statement that I could think of. I'll probably tell more when I'm less drunk.

嗯,我写的很匆忙,并没有检查得很好。子选择可能非常慢,但这是我能想到的最短且最简单的SQL语句。当我喝醉的时候,我可能会告诉你更多。

PS: Oh well, "foo" is the name of my table, "food" contains the name of the food and "country" the name of the country. Sample output:

PS:哦,好吧,“foo”是我桌子的名字,“food”包含食物的名称,“country”包含国家名称。样本输出:

   food    |  country   
-----------+------------
 Bratwurst | Germany
 Fisch     | Frankreich

#3


5  

try this:

尝试这个:

Select Country, Food_id
From Munch T1
Where Food_id= 
    (Select Food_id
     from Munch T2
     where T1.Country= T2.Country
     group by Food_id
     order by count(Food_id) desc
      limit 1)
group by Country, Food_id

#4


5  

It is now even simpler: PostgreSQL 9.4 introduced the mode() function:

它现在更简单:PostgreSQL 9.4引入了mode()函数:

select mode() within group (order by food_id)
from munch
group by country

returns (like user2247323's example):

返回(如user2247323的示例):

country | mode
--------------
GB      | 3
US      | 1

See documentation here: https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Aggregate_Mode

请参阅此处的文档:https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Aggregate_Mode

https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/functions-aggregate.html#FUNCTIONS-ORDEREDSET-TABLE

https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/functions-aggregate.html#FUNCTIONS-ORDEREDSET-TABLE

#5


3  

Here's how to do it without any temp tables:

以下是如何在没有任何临时表的情况下执行此操作:

Edit: simplified

编辑:简化

select nf.country, nf.food_id as most_frequent_food_id
from national_foods nf
group by country, food_id 
having
  (country,count(*)) in (  
                        select country, max(cnt)
                        from
                          (
                          select country, food_id, count(*) as cnt
                          from national_foods nf1
                          group by country, food_id
                          )
                        group by country
                        having country = nf.country
                        )

#6


3  

SELECT country, MAX( food_id )
  FROM( SELECT m1.country, m1.food_id
          FROM munch m1
         INNER JOIN ( SELECT country
                           , food_id
                           , COUNT(*) as food_counts
                        FROM munch m2
                    GROUP BY country, food_id ) as m3
                 ON m1.country = m3.country
         GROUP BY m1.country, m1.food_id 
        HAVING COUNT(*) / COUNT(DISTINCT m3.food_id) = MAX(food_counts) ) AS max_foods
  GROUP BY country

I don't like the MAX(.) GROUP BY to break ties... There's gotta be a way to incorporate eaten date into the JOIN in some way to arbitrarily select the most recent one...

我不喜欢MAX(。)GROUP BY来打破关系......必须有一种方法可以通过某种方式将吃掉的日期合并到JOIN中,以任意选择最新的...

I'm interested on the query plan for this thing if you run it on your live data!

如果您在实时数据上运行它,我对此事的查询计划感兴趣!

#7


3  

select country,food_id, count(*) ne  
from   food f1  
group by country,food_id    
having count(*) = (select max(count(*))  
                   from   food f2  
                   where  country = f1.country  
                   group by food_id)  

#8


2  

Try something like this

尝试这样的事情

select country, food_id, count(*) cnt 
into #tempTbl 
from mytable 
group by country, food_id

select country, food_id
from  #tempTbl as x
where cnt = 
  (select max(cnt) 
  from mytable 
  where country=x.country 
  and food_id=x.food_id)

This could be put all into a single select, but I don't have time to muck around with it right now.

这可以全部放入一个选项中,但我现在没有时间去处理它。

Good luck.

祝你好运。

#9


1  

Here is a statement which I believe gives you what you want and is simple and concise:

这是一个声明,我相信它会给你你想要的东西,简单明了:

select distinct on (country) country, food_id
from munch
group by country, food_id
order by country, count(*) desc

Please let me know what you think.

请让我知道你在想什么。

BTW, the distinct on feature is only available in Postgres.

顺便说一句,独特的功能仅在Postgres中可用。

Example, source data:

示例,源数据:

country | food_id | eaten
US        1         2017-1-1
US        1         2017-1-1
US        2         2017-1-1
US        3         2017-1-1
GB        3         2017-1-1
GB        3         2017-1-1
GB        2         2017-1-1

output:

输出:

country | food_id
US        1
GB        3

#1


13  

PostgreSQL introduced support for window functions in 8.4, the year after this question was asked. It's worth noting that it might be solved today as follows:

PostgreSQL在提出这个问题后的一年中引入了对8.4功能的窗口功能的支持。值得注意的是,今天可能会解决如下问题:

SELECT country, food_id
  FROM (SELECT country, food_id, ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY country ORDER BY freq DESC) AS rn
          FROM (  SELECT country, food_id, COUNT('x') AS freq
                    FROM country_foods
                GROUP BY 1, 2) food_freq) ranked_food_req
 WHERE rn = 1;

The above will break ties. If you don't want to break ties, you could use DENSE_RANK() instead.

以上将打破关系。如果你不想打破关系,你可以改用DENSE_RANK()。

#2


8  

SELECT DISTINCT
"F1"."food",
"F1"."country"
FROM "foo" "F1"
WHERE
"F1"."food" =
    (SELECT "food" FROM
        (
            SELECT "food", COUNT(*) AS "count"
            FROM "foo" "F2" 
            WHERE "F2"."country" = "F1"."country" 
            GROUP BY "F2"."food" 
            ORDER BY "count" DESC
        ) AS "F5"
        LIMIT 1
    )

Well, I wrote this in a hurry and didn't check it really well. The sub-select might be pretty slow, but this is shortest and most simple SQL statement that I could think of. I'll probably tell more when I'm less drunk.

嗯,我写的很匆忙,并没有检查得很好。子选择可能非常慢,但这是我能想到的最短且最简单的SQL语句。当我喝醉的时候,我可能会告诉你更多。

PS: Oh well, "foo" is the name of my table, "food" contains the name of the food and "country" the name of the country. Sample output:

PS:哦,好吧,“foo”是我桌子的名字,“food”包含食物的名称,“country”包含国家名称。样本输出:

   food    |  country   
-----------+------------
 Bratwurst | Germany
 Fisch     | Frankreich

#3


5  

try this:

尝试这个:

Select Country, Food_id
From Munch T1
Where Food_id= 
    (Select Food_id
     from Munch T2
     where T1.Country= T2.Country
     group by Food_id
     order by count(Food_id) desc
      limit 1)
group by Country, Food_id

#4


5  

It is now even simpler: PostgreSQL 9.4 introduced the mode() function:

它现在更简单:PostgreSQL 9.4引入了mode()函数:

select mode() within group (order by food_id)
from munch
group by country

returns (like user2247323's example):

返回(如user2247323的示例):

country | mode
--------------
GB      | 3
US      | 1

See documentation here: https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Aggregate_Mode

请参阅此处的文档:https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Aggregate_Mode

https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/functions-aggregate.html#FUNCTIONS-ORDEREDSET-TABLE

https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/functions-aggregate.html#FUNCTIONS-ORDEREDSET-TABLE

#5


3  

Here's how to do it without any temp tables:

以下是如何在没有任何临时表的情况下执行此操作:

Edit: simplified

编辑:简化

select nf.country, nf.food_id as most_frequent_food_id
from national_foods nf
group by country, food_id 
having
  (country,count(*)) in (  
                        select country, max(cnt)
                        from
                          (
                          select country, food_id, count(*) as cnt
                          from national_foods nf1
                          group by country, food_id
                          )
                        group by country
                        having country = nf.country
                        )

#6


3  

SELECT country, MAX( food_id )
  FROM( SELECT m1.country, m1.food_id
          FROM munch m1
         INNER JOIN ( SELECT country
                           , food_id
                           , COUNT(*) as food_counts
                        FROM munch m2
                    GROUP BY country, food_id ) as m3
                 ON m1.country = m3.country
         GROUP BY m1.country, m1.food_id 
        HAVING COUNT(*) / COUNT(DISTINCT m3.food_id) = MAX(food_counts) ) AS max_foods
  GROUP BY country

I don't like the MAX(.) GROUP BY to break ties... There's gotta be a way to incorporate eaten date into the JOIN in some way to arbitrarily select the most recent one...

我不喜欢MAX(。)GROUP BY来打破关系......必须有一种方法可以通过某种方式将吃掉的日期合并到JOIN中,以任意选择最新的...

I'm interested on the query plan for this thing if you run it on your live data!

如果您在实时数据上运行它,我对此事的查询计划感兴趣!

#7


3  

select country,food_id, count(*) ne  
from   food f1  
group by country,food_id    
having count(*) = (select max(count(*))  
                   from   food f2  
                   where  country = f1.country  
                   group by food_id)  

#8


2  

Try something like this

尝试这样的事情

select country, food_id, count(*) cnt 
into #tempTbl 
from mytable 
group by country, food_id

select country, food_id
from  #tempTbl as x
where cnt = 
  (select max(cnt) 
  from mytable 
  where country=x.country 
  and food_id=x.food_id)

This could be put all into a single select, but I don't have time to muck around with it right now.

这可以全部放入一个选项中,但我现在没有时间去处理它。

Good luck.

祝你好运。

#9


1  

Here is a statement which I believe gives you what you want and is simple and concise:

这是一个声明,我相信它会给你你想要的东西,简单明了:

select distinct on (country) country, food_id
from munch
group by country, food_id
order by country, count(*) desc

Please let me know what you think.

请让我知道你在想什么。

BTW, the distinct on feature is only available in Postgres.

顺便说一句,独特的功能仅在Postgres中可用。

Example, source data:

示例,源数据:

country | food_id | eaten
US        1         2017-1-1
US        1         2017-1-1
US        2         2017-1-1
US        3         2017-1-1
GB        3         2017-1-1
GB        3         2017-1-1
GB        2         2017-1-1

output:

输出:

country | food_id
US        1
GB        3