How to create hash object with keys created from values and grouped by them?
如何使用从值创建并按值分组的键创建散列对象?
cars = [{
id: 1,
properties: {
name: "audi",
type: "petrol"
},
},{
id: 1,
properties: {
name: "ford",
type: "petrol"
}
},{
id: 1,
properties: {
name: "tesla",
type: "electric"
}
}]
Desired effect:
预期效果:
{
petrol: [{name: "audi"}, {name: "ford"}],
electric: [{name: "tesla"}]
}
My current function gives desired effect but it is too long, How can I get the same effect with shorter code?
我的当前函数给出了期望的效果,但是它太长了,我怎么才能用更短的代码获得同样的效果呢?
cars.map { |c| Hash[c[:properties][:type], c[:properties][:name]] }.group_by{|h| h.keys.first}.each_value{|a| a.map!{|h| h.values.first}}
4 个解决方案
#1
4
I came up with something like this. The grouped_cars
variable should be extracted to a separate method.
我想到了这样的东西。grouped_cars变量应该被提取到一个单独的方法中。
grouped_cars = cars.inject({}) do |result, car|
result[car[:properties][:type]] ||= []
result[car[:properties][:type]] << { name: car[:properties][:name] }
result
end
{ cars: grouped_cars }
#2
2
My variant:
我的版本:
{
cars: cars.inject({}) do |hash, data|
type, name = data[:properties].values_at(:type, :name)
hash[type] ||= []
hash[type] << {name: name}
hash
end
}
And even shorter:
甚至更短:
{
cars: cars.inject(Hash.new([])) do |hash, car|
type, name = car[:properties].values_at(:type, :name);
hash[type] += [{ name: name }];
hash
end
}
#3
2
inject
method have to return the memo each time, I think each_with_object is better.
注入方法每次都要返回memo,我认为each_with_object更好。
cars.each_with_object({}) do |item, hash|
(hash[item[:properties][:type]] ||= []) << { name: item[:properties][:name] }
end
=> {"petrol"=>[{:name=>"audi"}, {:name=>"ford"}], "electric"=>[{:name=>"tesla"}]}
#4
0
I suggest the following:
我建议以下几点:
cars.map { |h| h[:properties] }.each_with_object({}) { |g,h|
h.update(g[:type]=>[{ name: g[:name] }]) { |_,o,n| {name: o+n } } }
#=> {"petrol"=>{:name=>[{:name=>"audi"}, {:name=>"ford"}]},
# "electric"=>[{:name=>"tesla"}]}
Firstly, we obtain:
首先,我们得到:
cars.map { |h| h[:properties] }
#=> [{:name=>"audi", :type=>"petrol"},
# {:name=>"ford", :type=>"petrol"},
# {:name=>"tesla", :type=>"electric"}]
We then use the form of Hash#update (aka merge!
) that uses the block:
然后我们使用Hash#update(又名merge!)的形式,使用block:
{ |_,o,n| { name: o+n } }
to determine the values of keys that are present in both hashes being merged.
确定合并的两个散列中存在的键的值。
Initially, the hash:
最初,该散列:
{ "petrol"=>[{ :name=>"audi"] }] }
is merged into an empty hash represented by the block variable h
. This merge does not make use of the block because h
is empty and therefore does not have a key "petrol"
.
合并到由块变量h表示的空散列中。这种合并不会使用块,因为h是空的,因此没有键“汽油”。
Next, the hash:
接下来,散列:
{ "petrol"=>[{ :name=>"ford" }] }
is merged into h
. Since both this hash and h
have keys "petrol"
, the value of "petrol"
is given by the block:
由于这个散列和h都有“汽油”键,所以block给出“汽油”的值:
{ |_,o,n| { name: o+n } }
#=> {|_,[{ :name=>"audi" }] , [{ :name=>"ford" }]|
# [{ name: "audi" }] + [{ name: "ford" }] }
#=> [{ name: "audi" }, { name: "ford" }]
Lastly, the hash:
最后,哈希:
{ "electric"=>{ :name=>"tesla" } }
is merged into h
. Since h
does not have a key "electric"
, the block is not not needed to determine the value of that key.
由于h没有键“electric”,所以不需要块来确定键的值。
#1
4
I came up with something like this. The grouped_cars
variable should be extracted to a separate method.
我想到了这样的东西。grouped_cars变量应该被提取到一个单独的方法中。
grouped_cars = cars.inject({}) do |result, car|
result[car[:properties][:type]] ||= []
result[car[:properties][:type]] << { name: car[:properties][:name] }
result
end
{ cars: grouped_cars }
#2
2
My variant:
我的版本:
{
cars: cars.inject({}) do |hash, data|
type, name = data[:properties].values_at(:type, :name)
hash[type] ||= []
hash[type] << {name: name}
hash
end
}
And even shorter:
甚至更短:
{
cars: cars.inject(Hash.new([])) do |hash, car|
type, name = car[:properties].values_at(:type, :name);
hash[type] += [{ name: name }];
hash
end
}
#3
2
inject
method have to return the memo each time, I think each_with_object is better.
注入方法每次都要返回memo,我认为each_with_object更好。
cars.each_with_object({}) do |item, hash|
(hash[item[:properties][:type]] ||= []) << { name: item[:properties][:name] }
end
=> {"petrol"=>[{:name=>"audi"}, {:name=>"ford"}], "electric"=>[{:name=>"tesla"}]}
#4
0
I suggest the following:
我建议以下几点:
cars.map { |h| h[:properties] }.each_with_object({}) { |g,h|
h.update(g[:type]=>[{ name: g[:name] }]) { |_,o,n| {name: o+n } } }
#=> {"petrol"=>{:name=>[{:name=>"audi"}, {:name=>"ford"}]},
# "electric"=>[{:name=>"tesla"}]}
Firstly, we obtain:
首先,我们得到:
cars.map { |h| h[:properties] }
#=> [{:name=>"audi", :type=>"petrol"},
# {:name=>"ford", :type=>"petrol"},
# {:name=>"tesla", :type=>"electric"}]
We then use the form of Hash#update (aka merge!
) that uses the block:
然后我们使用Hash#update(又名merge!)的形式,使用block:
{ |_,o,n| { name: o+n } }
to determine the values of keys that are present in both hashes being merged.
确定合并的两个散列中存在的键的值。
Initially, the hash:
最初,该散列:
{ "petrol"=>[{ :name=>"audi"] }] }
is merged into an empty hash represented by the block variable h
. This merge does not make use of the block because h
is empty and therefore does not have a key "petrol"
.
合并到由块变量h表示的空散列中。这种合并不会使用块,因为h是空的,因此没有键“汽油”。
Next, the hash:
接下来,散列:
{ "petrol"=>[{ :name=>"ford" }] }
is merged into h
. Since both this hash and h
have keys "petrol"
, the value of "petrol"
is given by the block:
由于这个散列和h都有“汽油”键,所以block给出“汽油”的值:
{ |_,o,n| { name: o+n } }
#=> {|_,[{ :name=>"audi" }] , [{ :name=>"ford" }]|
# [{ name: "audi" }] + [{ name: "ford" }] }
#=> [{ name: "audi" }, { name: "ford" }]
Lastly, the hash:
最后,哈希:
{ "electric"=>{ :name=>"tesla" } }
is merged into h
. Since h
does not have a key "electric"
, the block is not not needed to determine the value of that key.
由于h没有键“electric”,所以不需要块来确定键的值。