I have a rails route set up like:
我有一条像这样的轨道:
match ':controller/:id/:action'
# match 'teams/:id' => "teams#show" # doesn't have any additional effect, which makes sense to me
resources :teams, :only => [:index, :show]
That way I can say /teams/cleveland-indians and it will call teams#show with :id => 'cleveland-indians'. Works great. My issue is that url_for doesn't quite do what I want. In my views/teams/index view, I get this behavior:
这样，我就可以输入/teams/cleveland-indians，它会把team #show命名为:id => 'cleveland-indians'。伟大的工作。我的问题是url_for并没有完成我想要的。在我的观点/团队/索引视图中，我得到了这样的行为:
url_for(:id => "cleveland-indians") # => /teams/cleveland-indians/index
url_for(:id => "cleveland-indians", :action => :show) # => /teams/cleveland-indians/show
Of course that second one behaves the way I want, but I'd like to get rid of the unnecessary /show at the end. I don't know much about how these helpers work, but I'd have guessed it would know that show was the default action for a GET with a specified id, same as the routing engine does. Anyway, what's the best way for me to take care of this? Or am I just doing it all wrong?
当然第二种方式是我想要的，但是我想在最后摆脱不必要的/展示。我不太了解这些助手是如何工作的，但是我猜想它会知道show是带有指定id的GET的默认操作，就像路由引擎一样。不管怎样，对我来说最好的处理方法是什么?或者我只是做错了?
1 个解决方案
#1
1
'resources' line should already provide you with the routes you probably want so you can just remove first 'match' line.
“资源”行应该已经为您提供了您可能需要的路由，因此您可以删除第一个“匹配”行。
Note that you can also use 'teams_path', 'team_path("cleveland-indians")' instead of 'url_for'.
注意，您还可以使用'teams_path'、'team_path(“cleveland-indians”)而不是'url_for'。
#1
1
'resources' line should already provide you with the routes you probably want so you can just remove first 'match' line.
“资源”行应该已经为您提供了您可能需要的路由，因此您可以删除第一个“匹配”行。
Note that you can also use 'teams_path', 'team_path("cleveland-indians")' instead of 'url_for'.
注意，您还可以使用'teams_path'、'team_path(“cleveland-indians”)而不是'url_for'。