I need to convert json string to java object and display it as a long. The json string is a fixed array of long numbers:
我需要将json字符串转换为java对象,并将其显示为一个long。json字符串是一个固定的长数字数组:
{numbers
[ 268627104, 485677888, 506884800 ] }
The code to convert works fine in all cases except for numbers ending in 0. It converts those to a scientific notation number format:
除在0结尾的数字外,转换代码在所有情况下都适用。它将这些数字转换为科学的符号数字格式:
public static Object fromJson(HttpResponse response, Class<?> classOf)
throws IOException {
InputStream instream = response.getResponseInputStream();
Object obj = null;
try {
Reader reader = new InputStreamReader(instream, HTTP.UTF_8);
Gson gson = new Gson();
obj = gson.fromJson(reader, classOf);
Logger.d(TAG, "json --> "+gson.toJson(obj));
} catch (UnsupportedEncodingException e) {
Logger.e(TAG, "unsupported encoding", e);
} catch (Exception e) {
Logger.e(TAG, "json parsing error", e);
}
return obj;
}
The actual result: Java object : 268627104, 485677888, 5.068848E+8
实际结果:Java对象:268627104、485677888、5.068848E+8。
Notice the last number is converted to a scientific notation format. Can anyone suggest what could be done to work around it or prevent it or undo it? I'm using Gson v1.7.1
注意最后一个数字转换为科学的符号格式。有没有人能建议我们可以做些什么来解决它,或者阻止它或者撤销它?我用Gson v1.7.1
6 个解决方案
#1
15
If serializing to a String is an option for you, you can configure GSON to do so with:
如果序列化到一个字符串是您的一个选项,您可以配置GSON这样做:
GsonBuilder gsonBuilder = new GsonBuilder();
gsonBuilder.setLongSerializationPolicy( LongSerializationPolicy.STRING );
Gson gson = gsonBuilder.create();
This will produce something like:
这将产生一些类似的东西:
{numbers : [ "268627104", "485677888", "506884800" ] }
#2
8
Another work around is to use the JsonParser class instead. This will return the Gson object representations (JsonElement) rather than a user defined class, but avoids the problem of conversion to scientific notation.
另一个工作是使用JsonParser类。这将返回Gson对象表示(JsonElement),而不是用户定义的类,但避免了转换为科学符号的问题。
import java.lang.reflect.Type;
import java.util.Map;
import com.google.gson.Gson;
import com.google.gson.JsonElement;
import com.google.gson.JsonParser;
import com.google.gson.reflect.TypeToken;
public class GsonTest
{
public static void main(String[] args)
{
String json = "{numbers:[268627104,485677888,506884800]}";
Gson gson = new Gson();
Type type = new TypeToken<Map<String, Object>>(){}.getType();
Map<String, Object> jsonMap = gson.fromJson(json, type);
System.out.println("Gson output:");
System.out.println(jsonMap);
JsonParser jsonParser = new JsonParser();
JsonElement jsonElement = jsonParser.parse(json);
System.out.println("JsonParser output:");
System.out.println(jsonElement);
}
}
Code Output:
代码的输出:
Gson output:
{numbers=[2.68627104E8, 4.85677888E8, 5.068848E8]}
JsonParser output:
{"numbers":[268627104,485677888,506884800]}
#3
1
I had a similar problem, and it not only converts integers to double, but it actually loses precision for certain long numbers, as described in this related question.
我有一个类似的问题,它不仅将整数转换为double,而且它实际上会丢失某些长数字的精度,正如在这个相关的问题中所描述的那样。
I tracked down this conversion to ObjectTypeAdapter
's read
method, specifically:
我找到了这个转换到ObjectTypeAdapter的读取方法,具体如下:
case NUMBER:
return in.nextDouble();
It may be possible to plug in a modified TypeAdapter
for Object
, but I couldn't get that to work, so instead I just copied the read
method (Object read(JsonReader in)
) to my own code and modified the above lines to this:
可以将修改后的TypeAdapter插入对象中,但是我不能让它工作,所以我只是将read方法(对象读(JsonReader))复制到我自己的代码中,并修改了上面的代码行:
case NUMBER:
final String s = in.nextString();
try {
return Integer.parseInt(s);
} catch (NumberFormatException e) {
// ignore
}
try {
return Long.parseLong(s);
} catch (NumberFormatException e) {
// ignore
}
return Double.parseDouble(s);
I wish Gson did this by default..
我希望Gson在默认情况下这样做。
Then I put the other connecting pieces in a helper method that looks something like this:
然后我把另一个连接件放到一个辅助方法中,它看起来像这样:
public static Object parse(final Reader r) {
try (final JsonReader jr = new JsonReader(r)) {
jr.setLenient(true);
boolean empty = true;
Object o = null;
try {
jr.peek();
empty = false;
o = read(jr);
} catch (EOFException e) {
if (!empty) {
throw new JsonSyntaxException(e);
}
}
if (o != null && jr.peek() != JsonToken.END_DOCUMENT) {
throw new JsonIOException("JSON document was not fully consumed.");
}
return o;
} catch (IOException e) {
throw new JsonIOException(e);
}
}
So now instead of new Gson().fromJson(r, Object.class)
, I call parse(r)
.
所以现在不是新的Gson(). fromjson (r, Object.class),我调用parse(r)。
This works well for me because I want to be able to parse json data with any structure, but if you have a particular class you're targeting, you probably just need to eliminate occurrences of Object
within that class's members.
这对我来说很有用,因为我希望能够解析json数据的任何结构,但是如果您有一个特定的类,那么您可能只需要在该类的成员中消除对象的出现。
#4
1
Got the same issue, after some investigation here is what I found.
我发现了同样的问题。
The behavior:
的行为:
- Gson
For a number without fractional part,Gson
would convert it asDouble
, - Gson的数字没有小数部分,Gson会把它转换成Double,
- Jackson
For a number without fractional part,Jackson
would convert it asInteger
orLong
, depends on how large the number is. - 杰克逊的数字没有小数部分,杰克逊会把它转换成整数或长,这取决于数字的大小。
Possible solutions:
可能的解决方式:
- Convert
Gson
's return value fromDouble
toLong
, explicitly. - 显式地将Gson的返回值从Double转换为Long。
- Use
Jackson
instead.
I prefer this. - 而是使用杰克逊。我更喜欢这个。
Code - test for Jackson
杰克逊的代码测试。
ParseNumberTest.java:
ParseNumberTest.java:
import java.util.List;
import org.testng.Assert;
import org.testng.annotations.Test;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.ObjectMapper;
/**
* test - jackson parse numbers,
*
* @author eric
* @date Jan 13, 2018 12:28:36 AM
*/
public class ParseNumberTest {
@Test
public void test() throws Exception {
String jsonFn = "numbers.json";
ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper();
DummyData dd = mapper.readValue(this.getClass().getResourceAsStream(jsonFn), DummyData.class);
for (Object data : dd.dataList) {
System.out.printf("data type: %s, value: %s\n", data.getClass().getName(), data.toString());
Assert.assertTrue(data.getClass() == Double.class || data.getClass() == Long.class || data.getClass() == Integer.class);
System.out.printf("%s\n\n", "------------");
}
}
static class DummyData {
List<Object> dataList;
public List<Object> getDataList() {
return dataList;
}
public void setDataList(List<Object> dataList) {
this.dataList = dataList;
}
}
}
numbers.json:
numbers.json:
{
"dataList": [
150000000000,
150778742934,
150000,
150000.0
]
}
How to run:
如何运行:
- The test case is based on
Jackson
&TestNG
. - 测试用例基于Jackson & TestNG。
- Put
numbers.json
at the same package asParseNumberTest.java
. - 把数字。与ParseNumberTest.java相同的包中的json。
- Run as testng test, then it would print type & value of the parse result.
- 作为testng测试,它将打印解析结果的类型和值。
Output:
输出:
data type: java.lang.Long, value: 150000000000
------------
data type: java.lang.Long, value: 150778742934
------------
data type: java.lang.Integer, value: 150000
------------
data type: java.lang.Double, value: 150000.0
------------
PASSED: test
#5
0
Not smart, but still working method is to add " at the start and at the end of the number. Then after processing is finished, delete it.
不聪明,但仍在工作的方法是增加“在开始和结束时的数字。”处理完成后,删除它。
#6
-2
I did not find a solution to my problem of gson formatting numbers ending in 0 to scientific notation. I instead used a work-around to convert this scientific notation into a double that I formatted with commas. "value" is the json string.
我没有找到一个解决我的gson格式的问题的解决方案,以0到科学的符号结尾。相反,我使用了一种方法,将这种科学符号转换成我用逗号进行格式化的两倍。“值”是json字符串。
private String formatNumber(String value) {
double dValue = Double.parseDouble(value);
String pattern = "#,###";
DecimalFormat formatter = new DecimalFormat(pattern);
String newNumber = formatter.format(dValue);
return newNumber;
}
This doesn't answer the question asked but is an added step to work-around the problem to display the numbers as required by the system.
这并没有回答问题,而是增加了解决问题的步骤,以显示系统需要的数字。
#1
15
If serializing to a String is an option for you, you can configure GSON to do so with:
如果序列化到一个字符串是您的一个选项,您可以配置GSON这样做:
GsonBuilder gsonBuilder = new GsonBuilder();
gsonBuilder.setLongSerializationPolicy( LongSerializationPolicy.STRING );
Gson gson = gsonBuilder.create();
This will produce something like:
这将产生一些类似的东西:
{numbers : [ "268627104", "485677888", "506884800" ] }
#2
8
Another work around is to use the JsonParser class instead. This will return the Gson object representations (JsonElement) rather than a user defined class, but avoids the problem of conversion to scientific notation.
另一个工作是使用JsonParser类。这将返回Gson对象表示(JsonElement),而不是用户定义的类,但避免了转换为科学符号的问题。
import java.lang.reflect.Type;
import java.util.Map;
import com.google.gson.Gson;
import com.google.gson.JsonElement;
import com.google.gson.JsonParser;
import com.google.gson.reflect.TypeToken;
public class GsonTest
{
public static void main(String[] args)
{
String json = "{numbers:[268627104,485677888,506884800]}";
Gson gson = new Gson();
Type type = new TypeToken<Map<String, Object>>(){}.getType();
Map<String, Object> jsonMap = gson.fromJson(json, type);
System.out.println("Gson output:");
System.out.println(jsonMap);
JsonParser jsonParser = new JsonParser();
JsonElement jsonElement = jsonParser.parse(json);
System.out.println("JsonParser output:");
System.out.println(jsonElement);
}
}
Code Output:
代码的输出:
Gson output:
{numbers=[2.68627104E8, 4.85677888E8, 5.068848E8]}
JsonParser output:
{"numbers":[268627104,485677888,506884800]}
#3
1
I had a similar problem, and it not only converts integers to double, but it actually loses precision for certain long numbers, as described in this related question.
我有一个类似的问题,它不仅将整数转换为double,而且它实际上会丢失某些长数字的精度,正如在这个相关的问题中所描述的那样。
I tracked down this conversion to ObjectTypeAdapter
's read
method, specifically:
我找到了这个转换到ObjectTypeAdapter的读取方法,具体如下:
case NUMBER:
return in.nextDouble();
It may be possible to plug in a modified TypeAdapter
for Object
, but I couldn't get that to work, so instead I just copied the read
method (Object read(JsonReader in)
) to my own code and modified the above lines to this:
可以将修改后的TypeAdapter插入对象中,但是我不能让它工作,所以我只是将read方法(对象读(JsonReader))复制到我自己的代码中,并修改了上面的代码行:
case NUMBER:
final String s = in.nextString();
try {
return Integer.parseInt(s);
} catch (NumberFormatException e) {
// ignore
}
try {
return Long.parseLong(s);
} catch (NumberFormatException e) {
// ignore
}
return Double.parseDouble(s);
I wish Gson did this by default..
我希望Gson在默认情况下这样做。
Then I put the other connecting pieces in a helper method that looks something like this:
然后我把另一个连接件放到一个辅助方法中,它看起来像这样:
public static Object parse(final Reader r) {
try (final JsonReader jr = new JsonReader(r)) {
jr.setLenient(true);
boolean empty = true;
Object o = null;
try {
jr.peek();
empty = false;
o = read(jr);
} catch (EOFException e) {
if (!empty) {
throw new JsonSyntaxException(e);
}
}
if (o != null && jr.peek() != JsonToken.END_DOCUMENT) {
throw new JsonIOException("JSON document was not fully consumed.");
}
return o;
} catch (IOException e) {
throw new JsonIOException(e);
}
}
So now instead of new Gson().fromJson(r, Object.class)
, I call parse(r)
.
所以现在不是新的Gson(). fromjson (r, Object.class),我调用parse(r)。
This works well for me because I want to be able to parse json data with any structure, but if you have a particular class you're targeting, you probably just need to eliminate occurrences of Object
within that class's members.
这对我来说很有用,因为我希望能够解析json数据的任何结构,但是如果您有一个特定的类,那么您可能只需要在该类的成员中消除对象的出现。
#4
1
Got the same issue, after some investigation here is what I found.
我发现了同样的问题。
The behavior:
的行为:
- Gson
For a number without fractional part,Gson
would convert it asDouble
, - Gson的数字没有小数部分,Gson会把它转换成Double,
- Jackson
For a number without fractional part,Jackson
would convert it asInteger
orLong
, depends on how large the number is. - 杰克逊的数字没有小数部分,杰克逊会把它转换成整数或长,这取决于数字的大小。
Possible solutions:
可能的解决方式:
- Convert
Gson
's return value fromDouble
toLong
, explicitly. - 显式地将Gson的返回值从Double转换为Long。
- Use
Jackson
instead.
I prefer this. - 而是使用杰克逊。我更喜欢这个。
Code - test for Jackson
杰克逊的代码测试。
ParseNumberTest.java:
ParseNumberTest.java:
import java.util.List;
import org.testng.Assert;
import org.testng.annotations.Test;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.ObjectMapper;
/**
* test - jackson parse numbers,
*
* @author eric
* @date Jan 13, 2018 12:28:36 AM
*/
public class ParseNumberTest {
@Test
public void test() throws Exception {
String jsonFn = "numbers.json";
ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper();
DummyData dd = mapper.readValue(this.getClass().getResourceAsStream(jsonFn), DummyData.class);
for (Object data : dd.dataList) {
System.out.printf("data type: %s, value: %s\n", data.getClass().getName(), data.toString());
Assert.assertTrue(data.getClass() == Double.class || data.getClass() == Long.class || data.getClass() == Integer.class);
System.out.printf("%s\n\n", "------------");
}
}
static class DummyData {
List<Object> dataList;
public List<Object> getDataList() {
return dataList;
}
public void setDataList(List<Object> dataList) {
this.dataList = dataList;
}
}
}
numbers.json:
numbers.json:
{
"dataList": [
150000000000,
150778742934,
150000,
150000.0
]
}
How to run:
如何运行:
- The test case is based on
Jackson
&TestNG
. - 测试用例基于Jackson & TestNG。
- Put
numbers.json
at the same package asParseNumberTest.java
. - 把数字。与ParseNumberTest.java相同的包中的json。
- Run as testng test, then it would print type & value of the parse result.
- 作为testng测试,它将打印解析结果的类型和值。
Output:
输出:
data type: java.lang.Long, value: 150000000000
------------
data type: java.lang.Long, value: 150778742934
------------
data type: java.lang.Integer, value: 150000
------------
data type: java.lang.Double, value: 150000.0
------------
PASSED: test
#5
0
Not smart, but still working method is to add " at the start and at the end of the number. Then after processing is finished, delete it.
不聪明,但仍在工作的方法是增加“在开始和结束时的数字。”处理完成后,删除它。
#6
-2
I did not find a solution to my problem of gson formatting numbers ending in 0 to scientific notation. I instead used a work-around to convert this scientific notation into a double that I formatted with commas. "value" is the json string.
我没有找到一个解决我的gson格式的问题的解决方案,以0到科学的符号结尾。相反,我使用了一种方法,将这种科学符号转换成我用逗号进行格式化的两倍。“值”是json字符串。
private String formatNumber(String value) {
double dValue = Double.parseDouble(value);
String pattern = "#,###";
DecimalFormat formatter = new DecimalFormat(pattern);
String newNumber = formatter.format(dValue);
return newNumber;
}
This doesn't answer the question asked but is an added step to work-around the problem to display the numbers as required by the system.
这并没有回答问题,而是增加了解决问题的步骤,以显示系统需要的数字。