As the question states, is there any point adding Dublin Core meta-tags to your HTML head? Or has sitemap.org removed the use for most of this (though it only replaces some of the tags)
正如问题所述,是否有任何一点将都柏林核心元标记添加到HTML头部?或者使sitemap.org删除了大部分内容的使用(尽管它只替换了一些标签)
I ask this as most sites I visit don't seem to use DC metatags in their source.
我问这个,因为我访问的大多数网站似乎都没有在源代码中使用DC元标记。
I'm interested in whether I need them for a site that will be used mostly for developers, however the discussion can be broader than this category.
我感兴趣的是我是否需要它们用于主要用于开发人员的网站,但是讨论可能比这个类别更广泛。
To quote Google (from 2002):
引用谷歌(2002年):
"Currently we don't trust metadata because we are afraid of it being manipulated"
“目前我们不信任元数据,因为我们害怕它被操纵”
5 个解决方案
#1
5
Dublin Core is still very important in certain industry sectors. Here in the UK, government organisations use DC to provide standardised access to tags.
都柏林核心在某些行业领域仍然非常重要。在英国,*组织使用DC来提供对标签的标准化访问。
#2
5
I would rather say that the time of rich metadata hasn’t come yet. In fact technologies like RFD are just on the way up. Tim Berners-Lee – you know, the guy who invented the web – quite recently spoke at TED about The next Web of open, linked data. So Dublin Core and other metadata formats are anything but out.
我宁愿说富元数据的时间尚未到来。事实上,像RFD这样的技术正在崛起。蒂姆伯纳斯 - 李 - 你知道,发明网络的人 - 最近在TED上谈到了下一个开放链接数据网。所以都柏林核心和其他元数据格式都没有。
#3
2
META tags are not the only place you can put DC metadata. You can integrate it more with HTML using RDFa.
META标签不是唯一可以放置DC元数据的地方。您可以使用RDFa将其与HTML进行更多集成。
Now, as for proliferation — well, the only incentive it currently gives to webmasters is satisfaction for job well done, but does not yet affect SEO. As soon as this changes, you'll see outburst of sites tagged with RDF and microformats. And it will come. Yahoo already started working on that: http://ysearchblog.com/2008/03/13/the-yahoo-search-open-ecosystem/
现在,至于扩散 - 嗯,它目前给网站管理员的唯一激励是对工作做得很满意,但是还没有影响SEO。一旦这种情况发生变化,您就会看到用RDF和微格式标记的爆发点。它会来的。雅虎已经开始研究:http://ysearchblog.com/2008/03/13/the-yahoo-search-open-ecosystem/
#4
2
I was looking on the web for information about the Dublin Core and if search engines used them and I came across the academic paper "Search Engines and Resource Discovery on the Web: Is Dublin Core an Impact Factor?" by Mehdi Safari:
我正在网上寻找有关都柏林核心的信息,如果搜索引擎使用它们,我偶然发现了学术论文“网上搜索引擎和资源发现:都柏林核心是影响因素吗?”通过Mehdi Safari:
http://www.webology.ir/2005/v2n2/a13.html
To quote his conclusions section: "it was found that using Dublin Core elements did not improve the retrieval rank of the web pages" and that "Dublin Core metadata, as a well-known metadata schema, is not widely accepted and used by search engine designers and the spiders do not consider its elements while ranking the web pages".
引用他的结论部分:“发现使用Dublin Core元素并没有提高网页的检索等级”和“都柏林核心元数据,作为一个众所周知的元数据模式,未被搜索引擎广泛接受和使用”设计师和蜘蛛在排名网页时不考虑其元素“。
This was back in 2005, but I am assuming this is still true.
这是在2005年,但我认为这仍然是真的。
#5
1
Semantic web efforts are still sputtering along. I've run across a couple of research efforts to use RDF triples including the Dublin Core... but nothing close to commercialization.
语义网的努力仍在继续。我经历了一些研究工作,使用包括都柏林核心在内的RDF三元组......但没有任何接近商业化的内容。
However, as a general organizing principle for the world wild web? Don't bother. My guess is that folksonomies will deal with some metadata management, but that site tagging will need to be handled through ontological deduction of some sort. I get the same feeling around DC and RDF that I get around general-purpose globally open UDDI registries: nice idea, but that's not the way the world works.
但是,作为世界野生网络的一般组织原则?不要打扰。我的猜测是大众分类法将处理一些元数据管理,但是网站标记需要通过某种形式的本体论推断来处理。我对DC和RDF的感觉与周围全局开放的UDDI注册管理机构相同:好主意,但这不是世界的运作方式。
It would be kinda interesting to know whether DC tags increase your Google Page Rank (and how reliably): that could be a strong incitament for many!
知道DC标签是否会提高您的Google网页排名(以及可靠程度)会很有趣:这对许多人来说可能是一种强烈的煽动!
#1
5
Dublin Core is still very important in certain industry sectors. Here in the UK, government organisations use DC to provide standardised access to tags.
都柏林核心在某些行业领域仍然非常重要。在英国,*组织使用DC来提供对标签的标准化访问。
#2
5
I would rather say that the time of rich metadata hasn’t come yet. In fact technologies like RFD are just on the way up. Tim Berners-Lee – you know, the guy who invented the web – quite recently spoke at TED about The next Web of open, linked data. So Dublin Core and other metadata formats are anything but out.
我宁愿说富元数据的时间尚未到来。事实上,像RFD这样的技术正在崛起。蒂姆伯纳斯 - 李 - 你知道,发明网络的人 - 最近在TED上谈到了下一个开放链接数据网。所以都柏林核心和其他元数据格式都没有。
#3
2
META tags are not the only place you can put DC metadata. You can integrate it more with HTML using RDFa.
META标签不是唯一可以放置DC元数据的地方。您可以使用RDFa将其与HTML进行更多集成。
Now, as for proliferation — well, the only incentive it currently gives to webmasters is satisfaction for job well done, but does not yet affect SEO. As soon as this changes, you'll see outburst of sites tagged with RDF and microformats. And it will come. Yahoo already started working on that: http://ysearchblog.com/2008/03/13/the-yahoo-search-open-ecosystem/
现在,至于扩散 - 嗯,它目前给网站管理员的唯一激励是对工作做得很满意,但是还没有影响SEO。一旦这种情况发生变化,您就会看到用RDF和微格式标记的爆发点。它会来的。雅虎已经开始研究:http://ysearchblog.com/2008/03/13/the-yahoo-search-open-ecosystem/
#4
2
I was looking on the web for information about the Dublin Core and if search engines used them and I came across the academic paper "Search Engines and Resource Discovery on the Web: Is Dublin Core an Impact Factor?" by Mehdi Safari:
我正在网上寻找有关都柏林核心的信息,如果搜索引擎使用它们,我偶然发现了学术论文“网上搜索引擎和资源发现:都柏林核心是影响因素吗?”通过Mehdi Safari:
http://www.webology.ir/2005/v2n2/a13.html
To quote his conclusions section: "it was found that using Dublin Core elements did not improve the retrieval rank of the web pages" and that "Dublin Core metadata, as a well-known metadata schema, is not widely accepted and used by search engine designers and the spiders do not consider its elements while ranking the web pages".
引用他的结论部分:“发现使用Dublin Core元素并没有提高网页的检索等级”和“都柏林核心元数据,作为一个众所周知的元数据模式,未被搜索引擎广泛接受和使用”设计师和蜘蛛在排名网页时不考虑其元素“。
This was back in 2005, but I am assuming this is still true.
这是在2005年,但我认为这仍然是真的。
#5
1
Semantic web efforts are still sputtering along. I've run across a couple of research efforts to use RDF triples including the Dublin Core... but nothing close to commercialization.
语义网的努力仍在继续。我经历了一些研究工作,使用包括都柏林核心在内的RDF三元组......但没有任何接近商业化的内容。
However, as a general organizing principle for the world wild web? Don't bother. My guess is that folksonomies will deal with some metadata management, but that site tagging will need to be handled through ontological deduction of some sort. I get the same feeling around DC and RDF that I get around general-purpose globally open UDDI registries: nice idea, but that's not the way the world works.
但是,作为世界野生网络的一般组织原则?不要打扰。我的猜测是大众分类法将处理一些元数据管理,但是网站标记需要通过某种形式的本体论推断来处理。我对DC和RDF的感觉与周围全局开放的UDDI注册管理机构相同:好主意,但这不是世界的运作方式。
It would be kinda interesting to know whether DC tags increase your Google Page Rank (and how reliably): that could be a strong incitament for many!
知道DC标签是否会提高您的Google网页排名(以及可靠程度)会很有趣:这对许多人来说可能是一种强烈的煽动!