I'm using mockito to test a legacy JAAS/LDAP login module.
我正在使用mockito来测试遗留的JAAS / LDAP登录模块。
The javax.security.auth.callback.CallbackHandler
interface defines the function:
javax.security.auth.callback.CallbackHandler接口定义了该函数:
void handle(javax.security.auth.callback.Callback[] callbacks)
I'm expecting callbacks
to contain a NameCallback
, which is the object that needs to be manipulated to pass the test.
我期待回调包含一个NameCallback,这是需要操作以通过测试的对象。
Is there a way to mock this effectively, or would I be better off with a stubbed implementation of CallbackHandler
?
有没有办法有效地模拟这个,或者我会更好地使用CallbackHandler的存根实现?
1 个解决方案
#1
35
For functions returning void
, use doAnswer()
对于返回void的函数,请使用doAnswer()
doAnswer(...).when(mockedObject).handle(any(Callback[].class));
And an Answer
that performs the interception must go in as the parameter to doAnswer
, e.g. as an anonymous class:
并且执行拦截的答案必须作为doAnswer的参数输入,例如作为匿名类:
new Answer() {
public Object answer(InvocationOnMock invocation) {
Object[] args = invocation.getArguments();
Mock mock = invocation.getMock();
return null;
}}
In this case args
will be the array Callback[]
!
在这种情况下,args将是数组Callback []!
#1
35
For functions returning void
, use doAnswer()
对于返回void的函数,请使用doAnswer()
doAnswer(...).when(mockedObject).handle(any(Callback[].class));
And an Answer
that performs the interception must go in as the parameter to doAnswer
, e.g. as an anonymous class:
并且执行拦截的答案必须作为doAnswer的参数输入,例如作为匿名类:
new Answer() {
public Object answer(InvocationOnMock invocation) {
Object[] args = invocation.getArguments();
Mock mock = invocation.getMock();
return null;
}}
In this case args
will be the array Callback[]
!
在这种情况下,args将是数组Callback []!