CREATE TABLE 收藏表( `id` bigint(20) unsigned NOT NULL auto_increment COMMENT 'primary key', `uid` bigint(20) unsigned NOT NULL default 0 COMMENT 'uid',
`status` tinyint(3) unsigned NOT NULL default 0 COMMENT 'status', `book_id` bigint(20) unsigned NOT NULL default 0 COMMENT 'book Id', `create_time` int(11) unsigned not null default 0 COMMENT 'create time', PRIMARY KEY (`id`), UNIQUE KEY `uid_book_id` (`uid`, `book_id`),
KEY `uid_status` (`uid`, `status`) )ENGINED=Innodb Auto_increment=1 default charset=gbk COMMENT '用户收藏信息';
最容易想到的第一种分页语句是(这也是我们最容易想到的语句):
select distinct uid from 收藏表 order by uid desc limit 0, 10; select distinct uid from 收藏表 order by uid desc limit 11, 10;
再高级点语句,第二种($last_min_uid表示上一次读到的最后一个uid):
select distinct uid from 收藏表 order by uid desc limit 10; select distinct uid from 收藏表 where uid < $last_min_uid order by uid desc limit 10;
*的方式
select uid from 收藏表 group by uid order by uid desc limit 10; select uid from 收藏表 group by uid having uid < $last_min_uid order by uid desc limit 10;
以上三种方式都可以实现分页获取到用户ID列表,那么区别是什么?我现在就把每一种跟大家分析下。
第一种在业务场景中,会出现丢数据的情况。——这是比较严重的情况,不予采纳。
具体的业务场景是这样的:当你读取第5页的时候,前四页的用户id列表中,假如有一页的用户ID从库中删除掉,那么你这时读到的第5页(limit 51, 10),就是原来的第6页,你会把1页的用户ID丢失掉。
第二种的第二条语句,通过explain分析,实际并没有命中唯一索引,而只是命中了一般索引,数据查询范围在7百万级别,故explain建议我们使用group by。——这个查询会有严重的性能问题。
+----+--------------+---------------+-------+-------------------------------------------------------------+-------------+----------+-------+------------+------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| id | select_type | table | type | possible_keys | key | key_len | ref | rows | Extra |
+----+--------------+---------------+-------+-------------------------------------------------------------+---------------------+---------+------+---------+---------------------------------------------------------------------+
| 1 | SIMPLE | ubook_room | range | uid_book_id | uid_status | 4 | NULL | 7066423 | Using where; Using index for group-by; Using temporary; Using filesort |
+----+--------------+---------------+-------+-------------------------------------------------------------+-------------+----------+-------+------------+------------------------------------------------------------------------+
第三种explain分析,数据查询范围在12万级别(跟第二种相差一个数量级),查询性能高。
+----+---------------+------------+-------+-----------------+-----------------+---------+----------+----------+-------------+
| id | select_type | table | type | possible_keys | key | key_len | ref | rows | Extra |
+----+---------------+------------+-------+-----------------+-----------------+---------+----------+----------+-------------+
| 1 | SIMPLE | 收藏表 | index | NULL | uid_book_id | 12 | NULL | 121719 | Using index |
+----+---------------+------------+-------+-----------------+-----------------+---------+----------+----------+-------------+