电子邮件地址是URI吗?

I've tried to figure out whether the format of an e-mail address can be said to comply with the definition of a URI or not, but I've found no explicit confirmation of this so far. I hope someone can provide me with some insight here. Thanks in advance :)

我试图弄清楚电子邮件地址的格式是否符合URI的定义，但到目前为止我还没有找到明确的确认。我希望有人能给我一些启示。提前谢谢:)

6 个解决方案

#1

Yes, but with "mailto:" prefix.

是的，但是有“mailto:”前缀。

A URI has this form:

URI具有以下形式:

<scheme>:<scheme-specific-part>

The <scheme> is "mailto", the <scheme-specific-part> is the address.

是“mailto”，是地址。特异性-part>

For example:

例如:

mailto:max@provider.com

is a valid URI.

是一个有效的URI。

#2

Per RFC 3986:

RFC 3986:每

A Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) is a compact sequence of characters that identifies an abstract or physical resource.

统一资源标识符(Uniform Resource Identifier, URI)是标识抽象或物理资源的紧凑序列。

The basic syntax components as defined by the RFC:

RFC定义的基本语法组件:

The generic URI syntax consists of a hierarchical sequence of
components referred to as the scheme, authority, path, query, and
fragment.

  URI         = scheme ":" hier-part [ "?" query ] [ "#" fragment ]

  hier-part   = "//" authority path-abempty
              / path-absolute
              / path-rootless
              / path-empty

So - an e-mail address is not a URI. However mailto:you@server.com is a valid URI.

因此，电子邮件地址不是URI。但是mailto:you@server.com是一个有效的URI。

#3

An e-mail address on it's own - foo@bar.com - I'd say no. A link to an e-mail address - mailto:foo@bar.com - I'd say yes.

它的一个电子邮件地址是自己的- foo@bar.com -我拒绝。链接到电子邮件地址——mailto:foo@bar.com——我同意。

#4

yes when used with "mailto" scheme, look here: http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2396.txt

是的，当使用“mailto”计划时，请查看这里:http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2396.txt。

1.3. Example URI

1.3。例子URI

The following examples illustrate URI that are in common use.

下面的例子说明了常用的URI。

mailto:mduerst@ifi.unizh.ch
-- mailto scheme for electronic mail addresses

mailto:mduerst@ifi.unizh。ch——电子邮件地址的mailto方案。

#5

If all URL's are URI's then all mailto:soandso@somwhere.com address are URIs because they are URLs

如果所有URL都是URI，那么所有mailto:soandso@somwhere.com地址是URI，因为它们是URL。

So I think an email address is a URI, if it has mailto: in front of it.

所以我认为电子邮件地址是一个URI，如果它有mailto:在它前面。

http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2368 http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1738

#6

I think it is, if it includes the "mailto:" schema reference in the address; otherwise not. But as it is only seen at html pages, in the most of cases the email address it self could not be considered a URI.

我认为，如果它包含了“mailto:”模式引用地址;否则不。但由于它只出现在html页面中，在大多数情况下，电子邮件地址本身不能被认为是URI。

If you haven't checked before, take a look at RFC3305 document.

如果您之前没有检查过，请查看RFC3305文档。

The official register of URI scheme names is maintained by IANA at http://www.iana.org/assignments/uri-schemes.html

URI方案名称的正式注册表由IANA在http://www.iana.org/assignments/uri-schemes.html中维护。

I hope it helps, Carlos.

我希望这能帮上忙，卡洛斯。

#1