Semantic HTML makes it easier for Google to crawl and 'understand' a website but what about microformats? Are microformats any more semantic/crawlable then standard HTML markup?
语义HTML使Google更容易抓取并“理解”网站,但微格式呢?微格式是否比标准HTML标记更具语义/可抓取性?
6 个解决方案
#1
Google announced a little bit of RDFa and Microformats support in the last few days.
谷歌在过去几天宣布了一些RDFa和微格式支持。
Links and commentary here:
这里的链接和评论:
http://rdfa.info/2009/05/12/google-announces-support-for-rdfa/
Yahoo has been using RDFa and Microformats to drive Search Monkey for some time:
雅虎一直在使用RDFa和Microformats来推动Search Monkey:
http://developer.yahoo.com/searchmonkey/
Both will probably aid click-through rates, but not necessarily ranking. Expect more search engines to use more different RDFa vocabularies as time goes on. BOSS is also relevant here:
两者都可能有助于点击率,但不一定排名。随着时间的推移,预计会有更多搜索引擎使用更多不同的RDFa词汇表。 BOSS也与此相关:
http://developer.yahoo.com/search/boss/
The intent is to help create more search engines and they will have access to the data in the pages.
目的是帮助创建更多的搜索引擎,他们可以访问页面中的数据。
#2
For geographical information, Google will parse KML files and index them and the links in them.
对于地理信息,Google将解析KML文件并将其编入索引以及其中的链接。
I believe that Yahoo has gotten behind RDFa I don't think that Google has admitted to this yet.
我相信雅虎已经落后于RDFa我不认为谷歌已经承认了这一点。
#3
AFAIK, all major search engines support the rel-nofollow microformat. Beyond that, I'm not aware of any support. However, there are smaller, more specialized search engines that have been specifically designed with microformats in mind. E.g. there are search engines that allow you to do searches on relationships between persons, using the XFN microformat.
AFAIK,所有主要搜索引擎都支持rel-nofollow微格式。除此之外,我不知道任何支持。但是,有一些更小,更专业的搜索引擎在设计时考虑了微格式。例如。有些搜索引擎允许您使用XFN微格式对人与人之间的关系进行搜索。
#4
As far as i know Google doesn't actively talk about these micro formats as a way of generating your page rank, from what i understand its more for other kinds of bots that are not just making a general purpose search engine.
据我所知,谷歌并没有积极讨论这些微格式作为一种生成网页排名的方式,从我对其他类型的机器人的理解不仅仅是制作通用搜索引擎。
#5
At the moment Google did not announce any support for microformats yet. I hope, that in the near future they will.
On the other hand Yahoo has announced that it will support RDFa, eRDF and microformats.
目前谷歌尚未宣布对微格式的任何支持。我希望,在不久的将来,他们会。另一方面,雅虎宣布它将支持RDFa,eRDF和微格式。
#6
They make your pages more semantic insofaras they force a bit more consistency in the way that you fit your information together. The major search engines can and do read microformats, and often use them to display what Google calls "rich snippets" ( http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/05/introducing-rich-snippets.html ), which adds some interesting stuff to SERPs. Bing and Yahoo both display these too.
它们使您的页面更加语义化,它们会使您的信息更加一致。各大搜索引擎可以做阅读微格式,而且经常用它们来显示什么谷歌所谓的“丰富网页摘要”(http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/05/introducing-rich-snippets.html),它增加了一些有趣的东西给SERP。 Bing和Yahoo都展示了这些。
#1
Google announced a little bit of RDFa and Microformats support in the last few days.
谷歌在过去几天宣布了一些RDFa和微格式支持。
Links and commentary here:
这里的链接和评论:
http://rdfa.info/2009/05/12/google-announces-support-for-rdfa/
Yahoo has been using RDFa and Microformats to drive Search Monkey for some time:
雅虎一直在使用RDFa和Microformats来推动Search Monkey:
http://developer.yahoo.com/searchmonkey/
Both will probably aid click-through rates, but not necessarily ranking. Expect more search engines to use more different RDFa vocabularies as time goes on. BOSS is also relevant here:
两者都可能有助于点击率,但不一定排名。随着时间的推移,预计会有更多搜索引擎使用更多不同的RDFa词汇表。 BOSS也与此相关:
http://developer.yahoo.com/search/boss/
The intent is to help create more search engines and they will have access to the data in the pages.
目的是帮助创建更多的搜索引擎,他们可以访问页面中的数据。
#2
For geographical information, Google will parse KML files and index them and the links in them.
对于地理信息,Google将解析KML文件并将其编入索引以及其中的链接。
I believe that Yahoo has gotten behind RDFa I don't think that Google has admitted to this yet.
我相信雅虎已经落后于RDFa我不认为谷歌已经承认了这一点。
#3
AFAIK, all major search engines support the rel-nofollow microformat. Beyond that, I'm not aware of any support. However, there are smaller, more specialized search engines that have been specifically designed with microformats in mind. E.g. there are search engines that allow you to do searches on relationships between persons, using the XFN microformat.
AFAIK,所有主要搜索引擎都支持rel-nofollow微格式。除此之外,我不知道任何支持。但是,有一些更小,更专业的搜索引擎在设计时考虑了微格式。例如。有些搜索引擎允许您使用XFN微格式对人与人之间的关系进行搜索。
#4
As far as i know Google doesn't actively talk about these micro formats as a way of generating your page rank, from what i understand its more for other kinds of bots that are not just making a general purpose search engine.
据我所知,谷歌并没有积极讨论这些微格式作为一种生成网页排名的方式,从我对其他类型的机器人的理解不仅仅是制作通用搜索引擎。
#5
At the moment Google did not announce any support for microformats yet. I hope, that in the near future they will.
On the other hand Yahoo has announced that it will support RDFa, eRDF and microformats.
目前谷歌尚未宣布对微格式的任何支持。我希望,在不久的将来,他们会。另一方面,雅虎宣布它将支持RDFa,eRDF和微格式。
#6
They make your pages more semantic insofaras they force a bit more consistency in the way that you fit your information together. The major search engines can and do read microformats, and often use them to display what Google calls "rich snippets" ( http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/05/introducing-rich-snippets.html ), which adds some interesting stuff to SERPs. Bing and Yahoo both display these too.
它们使您的页面更加语义化,它们会使您的信息更加一致。各大搜索引擎可以做阅读微格式,而且经常用它们来显示什么谷歌所谓的“丰富网页摘要”(http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/05/introducing-rich-snippets.html),它增加了一些有趣的东西给SERP。 Bing和Yahoo都展示了这些。