I want to find the maximum of a nested array, something like this:
我想找到一个嵌套数组的最大值,像这样:
a = [[1,2],[20,3]]
d3.max(d3.max(a)) // 20
but my array contains a text field that I want to discard:
但是我的数组包含一个文本字段,我想要丢弃:
a = [["yz",1,2],["xy",20,3]]
d3.max(a) // 20
5 个解决方案
#1
70
If you have a nested array of numbers (arrays = [[1, 2], [20, 3]]
), nest d3.max:
如果你有一个嵌套的数字数组(数组=[1,2],[20,3]),那么你就可以选择3。
var max = d3.max(arrays, function(array) {
return d3.max(array);
});
Or equivalently, use array.map:
或者说,用array.map:
var max = d3.max(arrays.map(function(array) {
return d3.max(array);
}));
If you want to ignore string values, you can use array.filter to ignore strings:
如果要忽略字符串值,可以使用数组。忽略字符串过滤:
var max = d3.max(arrays, function(array) {
return d3.max(array.filter(function(value) {
return typeof value === "number";
}));
});
Alternatively, if you know the string is always in the first position, you could use array.slice which is a bit more efficient:
或者,如果您知道字符串始终处于第一个位置,则可以使用数组。切片的效率更高一些:
var max = d3.max(arrays, function(array) {
return d3.max(array.slice(1));
});
Yet another option is to use an accessor function which returns NaN
for values that are not numbers. This will cause d3.max to ignore those values. Conveniently, JavaScript's built-in Number
function does exactly this, so you can say:
另一种选择是使用accessor函数来返回NaN的值,而这些值不是数字。这将导致d3。max忽略这些值。很方便,JavaScript内置的数字函数做到了这一点,所以你可以说:
var max = d3.max(arrays, function(array) {
return d3.max(array, Number);
});
#2
4
Use this:
用这个:
function arrmax(arrs) {
var toplevel = [];
var f = function(v) {
return !isNaN(v);
};
for (var i = 0, l = arrs.length; i<l; i++) {
toplevel.push(Math.max.apply(window, arrs[i].filter(f)));
}
return Math.max.apply(window, toplevel);
}
or better:
或更好:
function arrmax(arrs) {
if (!arrs || !arrs.length) return undefined;
var max = Math.max.apply(window, arrs[0]), m,
f = function(v){ return !isNaN(v); };
for (var i = 1, l = arrs.length; i<l; i++) {
if ((m = Math.max.apply(window, arrs[i].filter(f)))>max) max=m;
}
return max;
}
See MDN for Array.filter method details.
看到MDN数组。过滤方法的细节。
#3
2
If you now exactly what columns you want to test, you can use:
如果您现在想要测试哪些列,可以使用:
var columns = ["ColumnA", "ColumnB", "ColumnC"];
var max = selectedMax(columns,dataset);
var min = selectedMin(columns,dataset)
function selectedMax(columns, dataset) {
var max;
columns.forEach(function(element, index, array) {
var tmpmax = d3.max(dataset, function(d) {
return +d[element];
});
max = (tmpmax > max || max === undefined) ? tmpmax : max;
});
return max;
}
function selectedMin(columns, dataset) {
var min;
columns.forEach(function(element, index, array) {
var tmpmin = d3.min(dataset, function(d) {
return +d[element];
});
min = (tmpmin < min || min === undefined) ? tmpmin : min;
});
return min;
}
#4
2
You can flatten an array and apply a function to each member
您可以将一个数组压平,并对每个成员应用一个函数。
Array.prototype.flatten= function(fun){
if(typeof fun!= 'function') fun= '';
var A= [], L= this.length, itm;
for(var i= 0; i<L; i++){
itm= this[i];
if(itm!= undefined){
if(!itm.flatten){
if(fun) itm= fun(itm);
if(itm) A.push(itm);
}
else A= A.concat(itm.flatten(fun));
}
}
return A;
}
var a= [["yz", 1, 2], ["xy", 20, 3]], max=-Infinity;
var max=Math.max.apply(a, a.flatten(Number));
#5
0
It's a cruel hack, but looking at the source code for d3.max
, your best bet might be to define a d3.max1
that discards the first element by copying that code, but replacing i=-1
with i=0
. The code at that link is excerpted here. Note that I'm not a regular d3.js user, but from what I know of the library, you're going to want make sure your version has an f.call
case like this function does, so that it can respond to live updates correctly.
这是一个残酷的黑客行为,但是看看d3的源代码。max,你最好的选择是定义d3。max1通过复制该代码来丢弃第一个元素,但是将i=-1替换为i=0。该链接的代码在这里摘录。注意,我不是普通的d3。js用户,但是根据我对库的了解,你需要确保你的版本有一个f。像这个函数这样的调用案例可以正确地响应实时更新。
d3.max = function(array, f) {
var i = -1,
n = array.length,
a,
b;
if (arguments.length === 1) {
while (++i < n && ((a = array[i]) == null || a != a)) a = undefined;
while (++i < n) if ((b = array[i]) != null && b > a) a = b;
} else {
while (++i < n && ((a = f.call(array, array[i], i)) == null || a != a)) a = undefined;
while (++i < n) if ((b = f.call(array, array[i], i)) != null && b > a) a = b;
}
return a;
};
Then it would just be d3.max(d3.max1(a))
.
那么它就是d3.max(d3.max1(a))。
#1
70
If you have a nested array of numbers (arrays = [[1, 2], [20, 3]]
), nest d3.max:
如果你有一个嵌套的数字数组(数组=[1,2],[20,3]),那么你就可以选择3。
var max = d3.max(arrays, function(array) {
return d3.max(array);
});
Or equivalently, use array.map:
或者说,用array.map:
var max = d3.max(arrays.map(function(array) {
return d3.max(array);
}));
If you want to ignore string values, you can use array.filter to ignore strings:
如果要忽略字符串值,可以使用数组。忽略字符串过滤:
var max = d3.max(arrays, function(array) {
return d3.max(array.filter(function(value) {
return typeof value === "number";
}));
});
Alternatively, if you know the string is always in the first position, you could use array.slice which is a bit more efficient:
或者,如果您知道字符串始终处于第一个位置,则可以使用数组。切片的效率更高一些:
var max = d3.max(arrays, function(array) {
return d3.max(array.slice(1));
});
Yet another option is to use an accessor function which returns NaN
for values that are not numbers. This will cause d3.max to ignore those values. Conveniently, JavaScript's built-in Number
function does exactly this, so you can say:
另一种选择是使用accessor函数来返回NaN的值,而这些值不是数字。这将导致d3。max忽略这些值。很方便,JavaScript内置的数字函数做到了这一点,所以你可以说:
var max = d3.max(arrays, function(array) {
return d3.max(array, Number);
});
#2
4
Use this:
用这个:
function arrmax(arrs) {
var toplevel = [];
var f = function(v) {
return !isNaN(v);
};
for (var i = 0, l = arrs.length; i<l; i++) {
toplevel.push(Math.max.apply(window, arrs[i].filter(f)));
}
return Math.max.apply(window, toplevel);
}
or better:
或更好:
function arrmax(arrs) {
if (!arrs || !arrs.length) return undefined;
var max = Math.max.apply(window, arrs[0]), m,
f = function(v){ return !isNaN(v); };
for (var i = 1, l = arrs.length; i<l; i++) {
if ((m = Math.max.apply(window, arrs[i].filter(f)))>max) max=m;
}
return max;
}
See MDN for Array.filter method details.
看到MDN数组。过滤方法的细节。
#3
2
If you now exactly what columns you want to test, you can use:
如果您现在想要测试哪些列,可以使用:
var columns = ["ColumnA", "ColumnB", "ColumnC"];
var max = selectedMax(columns,dataset);
var min = selectedMin(columns,dataset)
function selectedMax(columns, dataset) {
var max;
columns.forEach(function(element, index, array) {
var tmpmax = d3.max(dataset, function(d) {
return +d[element];
});
max = (tmpmax > max || max === undefined) ? tmpmax : max;
});
return max;
}
function selectedMin(columns, dataset) {
var min;
columns.forEach(function(element, index, array) {
var tmpmin = d3.min(dataset, function(d) {
return +d[element];
});
min = (tmpmin < min || min === undefined) ? tmpmin : min;
});
return min;
}
#4
2
You can flatten an array and apply a function to each member
您可以将一个数组压平,并对每个成员应用一个函数。
Array.prototype.flatten= function(fun){
if(typeof fun!= 'function') fun= '';
var A= [], L= this.length, itm;
for(var i= 0; i<L; i++){
itm= this[i];
if(itm!= undefined){
if(!itm.flatten){
if(fun) itm= fun(itm);
if(itm) A.push(itm);
}
else A= A.concat(itm.flatten(fun));
}
}
return A;
}
var a= [["yz", 1, 2], ["xy", 20, 3]], max=-Infinity;
var max=Math.max.apply(a, a.flatten(Number));
#5
0
It's a cruel hack, but looking at the source code for d3.max
, your best bet might be to define a d3.max1
that discards the first element by copying that code, but replacing i=-1
with i=0
. The code at that link is excerpted here. Note that I'm not a regular d3.js user, but from what I know of the library, you're going to want make sure your version has an f.call
case like this function does, so that it can respond to live updates correctly.
这是一个残酷的黑客行为,但是看看d3的源代码。max,你最好的选择是定义d3。max1通过复制该代码来丢弃第一个元素,但是将i=-1替换为i=0。该链接的代码在这里摘录。注意,我不是普通的d3。js用户,但是根据我对库的了解,你需要确保你的版本有一个f。像这个函数这样的调用案例可以正确地响应实时更新。
d3.max = function(array, f) {
var i = -1,
n = array.length,
a,
b;
if (arguments.length === 1) {
while (++i < n && ((a = array[i]) == null || a != a)) a = undefined;
while (++i < n) if ((b = array[i]) != null && b > a) a = b;
} else {
while (++i < n && ((a = f.call(array, array[i], i)) == null || a != a)) a = undefined;
while (++i < n) if ((b = f.call(array, array[i], i)) != null && b > a) a = b;
}
return a;
};
Then it would just be d3.max(d3.max1(a))
.
那么它就是d3.max(d3.max1(a))。