I currently want to make my project accessible not only via back-end code (C#, Python, PHP, etc.), so I decided to write an easy and simple JS API, every developer can easily integrate within their website / project. Since the whole thing is a service driven system, most of the stuff runs via RPC encoded as JSON.
我目前想让我的项目不仅可以通过后端代码（C＃，Python，PHP等）访问，所以我决定编写一个简单易用的JS API，每个开发人员都可以轻松地集成到他们的网站/项目中。由于整个事情是一个服务驱动的系统，大多数东西通过RPC编码为JSON运行。
My problem is, that if I want to make this API I got the following two options:
我的问题是，如果我想制作这个API，我有以下两个选项：
- Writting raw RPC functions from ground up
- 从头开始编写原始RPC函数
- Using jQuery as third-party library
- 使用jQuery作为第三方库
The big problem with option number 2, which is by far the best option, is that I have to say "dear developer, you need to use jQuery to access my API", which is striking me, since I do not want to dictate what ppl should or should not use by restricting their opportunities.
选项2的大问题是迄今为止最好的选择，我必须说“亲爱的开发人员，你需要使用jQuery来访问我的API”，这让我感到惊讶，因为我不想指示什么人们应该或不应该通过限制他们的机会来使用。
Is there a way implementing jQuery's RPC stuff without breaking any other potential JS framework the final developer will use?
有没有一种方法可以实现jQuery的RPC内容而不会破坏最终开发人员将使用的任何其他潜在的JS框架？
1 个解决方案
#1
1
if you're worried about the conflict between jquery and other libraries, use jQuery.noConflict() and it solves your problem!
more info at : http://docs.jquery.com/Using_jQuery_with_Other_Libraries
如果您担心jquery和其他库之间的冲突，请使用jQuery.noConflict（）并解决您的问题！有关更多信息，请访问：http：//docs.jquery.com/Using_jQuery_with_Other_Libraries
#1
1
if you're worried about the conflict between jquery and other libraries, use jQuery.noConflict() and it solves your problem!
more info at : http://docs.jquery.com/Using_jQuery_with_Other_Libraries
如果您担心jquery和其他库之间的冲突，请使用jQuery.noConflict（）并解决您的问题！有关更多信息，请访问：http：//docs.jquery.com/Using_jQuery_with_Other_Libraries