Here is my LINQ query:
这是我的LINQ查询:
(from o in entities.MyTable
orderby o.MyColumn
select o.MyColumn).Distinct();
Here is the result:
结果如下:
{"a", "c", "b", "d"}
Here is the generated SQL:
这是生成的SQL:
SELECT
[Distinct1].[MyColumn] AS [MyColumn]
FROM ( SELECT DISTINCT
[Extent1].[MyColumn] AS [MyColumn]
FROM [dbo].[MyTable] AS [Extent1]
) AS [Distinct1]
Is this a bug? Where's my ordering, damnit?
这是一个错误吗?我的订单在哪里,该死的?
2 个解决方案
#1
10
You should sort after Distinct
as it doesn't come with any guarantee about preserving the order:
您应该在Distinct之后排序,因为它没有任何关于保留订单的保证:
entities.MyTable.Select(o => o.MyColumn).Distinct().OrderBy(o => o);
#2
1
This question discusses the rules for Linq to Objects: Preserving order with LINQ
这个问题讨论了Linq to Objects的规则:使用LINQ保留顺序
In the database, even fewer operations preserve order. No one anywhere preserves order when Distinct'ing (as generally a Hash algorithm is used).
在数据库中,更少的操作保留了订单。当Distinct'ing(通常使用Hash算法)时,没有人能保持秩序。
#1
10
You should sort after Distinct
as it doesn't come with any guarantee about preserving the order:
您应该在Distinct之后排序,因为它没有任何关于保留订单的保证:
entities.MyTable.Select(o => o.MyColumn).Distinct().OrderBy(o => o);
#2
1
This question discusses the rules for Linq to Objects: Preserving order with LINQ
这个问题讨论了Linq to Objects的规则:使用LINQ保留顺序
In the database, even fewer operations preserve order. No one anywhere preserves order when Distinct'ing (as generally a Hash algorithm is used).
在数据库中,更少的操作保留了订单。当Distinct'ing(通常使用Hash算法)时,没有人能保持秩序。