前言
不管是Oracle还是MySQL,新版本推出的新特性,一方面给产品带来功能、性能、用户体验等方面的提升,另一方面也可能会带来一些问题,如代码bug、客户使用方法不正确引发问题等等。
案例分享
MySQL 5.7下的场景
(1)首先,创建两张表,并插入数据
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
|
mysql> select version();
+ ------------+
| version() |
+ ------------+
| 5.7.30-log |
+ ------------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)
mysql> show create table test\G
*************************** 1. row ***************************
Table : test
Create Table : CREATE TABLE `test` (
`id` int (10) unsigned NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
`k` int (10) unsigned NOT NULL DEFAULT '0' ,
`c` char (120) NOT NULL DEFAULT '' ,
`pad` char (60) NOT NULL DEFAULT '' ,
PRIMARY KEY (`id`),
KEY `k_1` (`k`)
) ENGINE=InnoDB AUTO_INCREMENT=101 DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8mb4 MAX_ROWS=1000000
1 row in set (0.00 sec)
mysql> show create table sbtest1\G
*************************** 1. row ***************************
Table : sbtest1
Create Table : CREATE TABLE `sbtest1` (
`id` int (10) unsigned NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
`k` int (10) unsigned NOT NULL DEFAULT '0' ,
`c` char (120) NOT NULL DEFAULT '' ,
`pad` char (60) NOT NULL DEFAULT '' ,
PRIMARY KEY (`id`),
KEY `k_1` (`k`)
) ENGINE=InnoDB AUTO_INCREMENT=1000001 DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8mb4 MAX_ROWS=1000000
1 row in set (0.00 sec)
mysql> select count (*) from test;
+ ----------+
| count (*) |
+ ----------+
| 100 |
+ ----------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)
mysql> select count (*) from sbtest1;
+ ----------+
| count (*) |
+ ----------+
| 1000000 |
+ ----------+
1 row in set (0.14 sec)
|
(2)查看两张表的统计信息,均比较准确
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
|
mysql> select table_schema,table_name,table_rows from tables where table_name= 'test' ;
+ --------------+------------+------------+
| table_schema | table_name | table_rows |
+ --------------+------------+------------+
| test | test | 100 |
+ --------------+------------+------------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)
mysql> select table_schema,table_name,table_rows from tables where table_name= 'sbtest1' ;
+ --------------+------------+------------+
| table_schema | table_name | table_rows |
+ --------------+------------+------------+
| test | sbtest1 | 947263 |
+ --------------+------------+------------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)
|
(3)我们持续往test表插入1000w条记录,并再次查看统计信息,还是相对准确的,因为在默认情况下,数据变化量超过10%,就会触发统计信息更新
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
|
mysql> select count (*) from test;
+ ----------+
| count (*) |
+ ----------+
| 10000100 |
+ ----------+
1 row in set (1.50 sec)
mysql> select table_schema,table_name,table_rows from tables where table_name= 'test' ;
+ --------------+------------+------------+
| table_schema | table_name | table_rows |
+ --------------+------------+------------+
| test | test | 9749036 |
+ --------------+------------+------------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)
|
MySQL 8.0下的场景
(1)接下来我们看看8.0下的情况吧,同样地,我们创建两张表,并插入相同记录
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
|
mysql> select version();
+ -----------+
| version() |
+ -----------+
| 8.0.20 |
+ -----------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)
mysql> show create table test\G
*************************** 1. row ***************************
Table : test
Create Table : CREATE TABLE `test` (
`id` int unsigned NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
`k` int unsigned NOT NULL DEFAULT '0' ,
`c` char (120) NOT NULL DEFAULT '' ,
`pad` char (60) NOT NULL DEFAULT '' ,
PRIMARY KEY (`id`),
KEY `k_1` (`k`)
) ENGINE=InnoDB AUTO_INCREMENT=101 DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8mb4 COLLATE =utf8mb4_0900_ai_ci MAX_ROWS=1000000
1 row in set (0.00 sec)
mysql> show create table sbtest1\G
*************************** 1. row ***************************
Table : sbtest1
Create Table : CREATE TABLE `sbtest1` (
`id` int unsigned NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
`k` int unsigned NOT NULL DEFAULT '0' ,
`c` char (120) NOT NULL DEFAULT '' ,
`pad` char (60) NOT NULL DEFAULT '' ,
PRIMARY KEY (`id`),
KEY `k_1` (`k`)
) ENGINE=InnoDB AUTO_INCREMENT=1000001 DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8mb4 COLLATE =utf8mb4_0900_ai_ci MAX_ROWS=1000000
1 row in set (0.00 sec)
mysql> select count (*) from test;
+ ----------+
| count (*) |
+ ----------+
| 100 |
+ ----------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)
mysql> select count (*) from sbtest1;
+ ----------+
| count (*) |
+ ----------+
| 1000000 |
+ ----------+
1 row in set (0.02 sec)
|
(2)查看两张表的统计信息,均比较准确
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
|
mysql> select table_schema,table_name,table_rows from tables where table_name= 'test' ;
+ --------------+------------+------------+
| TABLE_SCHEMA | TABLE_NAME | TABLE_ROWS |
+ --------------+------------+------------+
| test | test | 100 |
+ --------------+------------+------------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)
mysql> select table_schema,table_name,table_rows from tables where table_name= 'sbtest1' ;
+ --------------+------------+------------+
| TABLE_SCHEMA | TABLE_NAME | TABLE_ROWS |
+ --------------+------------+------------+
| test | sbtest1 | 947468 |
+ --------------+------------+------------+
1 row in set (0.01 sec)
|
(3)同样地,我们持续往test表插入1000w条记录,并再次查看统计信息,发现table_rows显示还是100条,出现了较大偏差
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
|
mysql> select count (*) from test;
+ ----------+
| count (*) |
+ ----------+
| 10000100 |
+ ----------+
1 row in set (0.33 sec)
mysql> select table_schema,table_name,table_rows from tables where table_name= 'test' ;
+ --------------+------------+------------+
| TABLE_SCHEMA | TABLE_NAME | TABLE_ROWS |
+ --------------+------------+------------+
| test | test | 100 |
+ --------------+------------+------------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)
|
原因剖析
那么导致统计信息不准确的原因是什么呢?其实是MySQL 8.0为了提高information_schema的查询效率,将视图tables和statistics里面的统计信息缓存起来,缓存过期时间由参数information_schema_stats_expiry决定,默认为86400s;如果想获取最新的统计信息,可以通过如下两种方式:
(1)analyze table进行表分析
(2)设置information_schema_stats_expiry=0
继续探索
那么统计信息不准确,会带来哪些影响呢?是否会影响执行计划呢?接下来我们再次进行测试
测试1:表test记录数100,表sbtest1记录数100w
执行如下SQL,查看执行计划,走的是NLJ,小表test作为驱动表(全表扫描),大表sbtest1作为被驱动表(主键关联),执行效率很快
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
|
mysql> select count (*) from test;
+ ----------+
| count (*) |
+ ----------+
| 100 |
+ ----------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)
mysql> select count (*) from sbtest1;
+ ----------+
| count (*) |
+ ----------+
| 1000000 |
+ ----------+
1 row in set (0.02 sec)
mysql> select table_schema,table_name,table_rows from tables where table_name= 'test' ;
+ --------------+------------+------------+
| TABLE_SCHEMA | TABLE_NAME | TABLE_ROWS |
+ --------------+------------+------------+
| test | test | 100 |
+ --------------+------------+------------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)
mysql> select table_schema,table_name,table_rows from tables where table_name= 'sbtest1' ;
+ --------------+------------+------------+
| TABLE_SCHEMA | TABLE_NAME | TABLE_ROWS |
+ --------------+------------+------------+
| test | sbtest1 | 947468 |
+ --------------+------------+------------+
1 row in set (0.01 sec)
mysql> select t.* from test t inner join sbtest1 t1 on t.id=t1.id where t.c= '08566691963-88624912351-16662227201-46648573979-64646226163-77505759394-75470094713-41097360717-15161106334-50535565977' and t1.c= '08566691963-88624912351-16662227201-46648573979-64646226163-77505759394-75470094713-41097360717-15161106334-50535565977' ;
+ ----+--------+-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+-------------------------------------------------------------+
| id | k | c | pad |
+ ----+--------+-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+-------------------------------------------------------------+
| 1 | 501885 | 08566691963-88624912351-16662227201-46648573979-64646226163-77505759394-75470094713-41097360717-15161106334-50535565977 | 63188288836-92351140030-06390587585-66802097351-49282961843 |
+ ----+--------+-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+-------------------------------------------------------------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)
mysql> explain select t.* from test t inner join sbtest1 t1 on t.id=t1.id where t.c= '08566691963-88624912351-16662227201-46648573979-64646226163-77505759394-75470094713-41097360717-15161106334-50535565977' and t1.c='08566691963-88624912351-16662227201-4664
+ ----+-------------+-------+------------+--------+---------------+---------+---------+-----------+------+----------+-------------+
| id | select_type | table | partitions | type | possible_keys | key | key_len | ref | rows | filtered | Extra |
+ ----+-------------+-------+------------+--------+---------------+---------+---------+-----------+------+----------+-------------+
| 1 | SIMPLE | t | NULL | ALL | PRIMARY | NULL | NULL | NULL | 100 | 10.00 | Using where |
| 1 | SIMPLE | t1 | NULL | eq_ref | PRIMARY | PRIMARY | 4 | test.t.id | 1 | 10.00 | Using where |
+ ----+-------------+-------+------------+--------+---------------+---------+---------+-----------+------+----------+-------------+
2 rows in set , 1 warning (0.00 sec)
|
测试2:表test记录数1000w左右,表sbtest1记录数100w
再次执行SQL,查看执行计划,走的也是NLJ,相对小表sbtest1作为驱动表,大表test作为被驱动表,也是正确的执行计划
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
|
mysql> select count (*) from test;
+ ----------+
| count (*) |
+ ----------+
| 10000100 |
+ ----------+
1 row in set (0.33 sec)
mysql> select count (*) from sbtest1;
+ ----------+
| count (*) |
+ ----------+
| 1000000 |
+ ----------+
1 row in set (0.02 sec)
mysql> select table_schema,table_name,table_rows from tables where table_name= 'test' ;
+ --------------+------------+------------+
| TABLE_SCHEMA | TABLE_NAME | TABLE_ROWS |
+ --------------+------------+------------+
| test | test | 100 |
+ --------------+------------+------------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)
mysql> select table_schema,table_name,table_rows from tables where table_name= 'sbtest1' ;
+ --------------+------------+------------+
| TABLE_SCHEMA | TABLE_NAME | TABLE_ROWS |
+ --------------+------------+------------+
| test | sbtest1 | 947468 |
+ --------------+------------+------------+
1 row in set (0.01 sec)
mysql> select t.* from test t inner join sbtest1 t1 on t.id=t1.id where t.c= '08566691963-88624912351-16662227201-46648573979-64646226163-77505759394-75470094713-41097360717-15161106334-50535565977' and t1.c= '08566691963-88624912351-16662227201-46648573979-64646226163-77505759394-75470094713-41097360717-15161106334-50535565977' ;
+ ----+--------+-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+-------------------------------------------------------------+
| id | k | c | pad |
+ ----+--------+-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+-------------------------------------------------------------+
| 1 | 501885 | 08566691963-88624912351-16662227201-46648573979-64646226163-77505759394-75470094713-41097360717-15161106334-50535565977 | 63188288836-92351140030-06390587585-66802097351-49282961843 |
+ ----+--------+-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+-------------------------------------------------------------+
1 row in set (0.37 sec)
mysql> explain select t.* from test t inner join sbtest1 t1 on t.id=t1.id where t.c= '08566691963-88624912351-16662227201-46648573979-64646226163-77505759394-75470094713-41097360717-15161106334-50535565977' and t1.c= '08566691963-88624912351-16662227201-46648573979-64646226163-77505759394-75470094713-41097360717-15161106334-50535565977' ;
+ ----+-------------+-------+------------+--------+---------------+---------+---------+------------+--------+----------+-------------+
| id | select_type | table | partitions | type | possible_keys | key | key_len | ref | rows | filtered | Extra |
+ ----+-------------+-------+------------+--------+---------------+---------+---------+------------+--------+----------+-------------+
| 1 | SIMPLE | t1 | NULL | ALL | PRIMARY | NULL | NULL | NULL | 947468 | 10.00 | Using where |
| 1 | SIMPLE | t | NULL | eq_ref | PRIMARY | PRIMARY | 4 | test.t1.id | 1 | 10.00 | Using where |
+ ----+-------------+-------+------------+--------+---------------+---------+---------+------------+--------+----------+-------------+
2 rows in set , 1 warning (0.01 sec)
|
为什么优化器没有选择错误的执行计划呢?之前文章也提过,MySQL 8.0是将元数据信息存放在mysql库下的数据字典表里,information_schema库只是提供相对方便的视图供用户查询,所以优化器在选择执行计划时,会从数据字典表中获取统计信息,生成正确的执行计划。
总结
MySQL 8.0为了提高information_schema的查询效率,会将视图tables和statistics里面的统计信息缓存起来,缓存过期时间由参数information_schema_stats_expiry决定(建议设置该参数值为0);这可能会导致用户查询相应视图时,无法获取最新、准确的统计信息,但并不会影响执行计划的选择。
以上就是MySQL 8.0统计信息不准确的原因的详细内容,更多关于MySQL 8.0统计信息不准确的资料请关注服务器之家其它相关文章!
原文链接:https://cloud.tencent.com/developer/article/1684247