I used to think that the only layout engine supports @page is PrinceXML, but recently I detected this: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/@page
我曾经认为唯一的布局引擎支持@page是PrinceXML,但最近我发现了这个:https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/@page
Try to print this demo page in different browsers and PrinceXML.
尝试在不同的浏览器和PrinceXML中打印此演示页面。
Do I miss something?
我错过了什么吗?
1 个解决方案
#1
There was a long period in which Prince was way ahead of browsers in support of @page rules and other things that are generally useful for book generation, printing, etc. I do not believe browsers yet have good support for things like offset printing, archival PDF format selection, and lots of other features that are suited to print/book creation, but they are way closer than they used to be.
在很长一段时间里,Prince在浏览器方面领先于@page规则和其他通常对书籍生成,打印等有用的东西。我不认为浏览器对胶印,档案等事情有很好的支持。 PDF格式选择,以及许多适合打印/书籍创建的其他功能,但它们比以前更接近。
#1
There was a long period in which Prince was way ahead of browsers in support of @page rules and other things that are generally useful for book generation, printing, etc. I do not believe browsers yet have good support for things like offset printing, archival PDF format selection, and lots of other features that are suited to print/book creation, but they are way closer than they used to be.
在很长一段时间里,Prince在浏览器方面领先于@page规则和其他通常对书籍生成,打印等有用的东西。我不认为浏览器对胶印,档案等事情有很好的支持。 PDF格式选择,以及许多适合打印/书籍创建的其他功能,但它们比以前更接近。