CoInitialize()和AfxOleInit()
都是初始化COM库，不同之处在与：
OLE是建立在COM之上的技术，层次比COM要高。AfxOleInit()调用的是OleInitialize()，而 OleInitialize()除了调用CoInitializeEx()来初始化COM库外，还进行一些其它的操作，这些操作对OLE应用来说是必须的，这些OLE应用包括：
(1)Clipboard；
(2)Drag and drop；
(3)Object linking and embedding（现在的OLE，已不再仅仅是Object linking and embedding的概念）；
(4)In-place activation；
与AfxOleInit()对应的是，AfxOleTerm()。
AfxOleInit()和AfxOleTerm()其实也是需要成对的，但是，在你的程序中，AfxOleTerm()可以不出现，这是因为，MFC已经帮你做好了（有兴趣的话，你可以仔细研究一下CWinThread::m_lpfnOleTermOrFreeLib，而CWinApp是从CWinThread继承的）。
注:但是当你的函数出现了重复调用AfxOleInit()时间便不能依靠mfc自动调用了,需要显式的调用AfxOleTerm清理com库
CoInitialize与AfxOleInit
使用MFC的控制台主程序中如果用AfxOleInit()初始化com就会出现DLL中调用wordApp.CreateDispatch("Word.Application",NULL)失败，而改用用CoInitialize（）则会成功
在AfxOleInit()函数中设置断点调试之后可以知道:afxContextIsDLL这个标志的值为ture,因而它并不会去调用OleInitialize,进而不会调用CoInitialize.
MSDN(If AfxOleInit is called from an MFC DLL, the call will fail. The failure occurs because the function assumes that, if it is called from a DLL, the OLE system was previously initialized by the calling application.) 看来在这个函数中把当前项目当做DLL来处理了.^_^,不知是不是MFC本身的bug
BOOL AFXAPI AfxOleInit()
{
_AFX_THREAD_STATE* pState = AfxGetThreadState();
ASSERT(!pState->m_bNeedTerm); // calling it twice? // Special case DLL context to assume that the calling app initializes OLE.
// For DLLs where this is not the case, those DLLs will need to initialize
// OLE for themselves via OleInitialize. This is done since MFC cannot provide
// automatic uninitialize for DLLs because it is not valid to shutdown OLE
// during a DLL_PROCESS_DETACH.
if (afxContextIsDLL)
{
pState->m_bNeedTerm = -; // -1 is a special flag
return TRUE;
} // first, initialize OLE
SCODE sc = ::OleInitialize(NULL);
if (FAILED(sc))
{
// warn about non-NULL success codes
#ifdef _DEBUG
TRACE(traceOle, , _T("Warning: OleInitialize returned scode = %s.\n"),
AfxGetFullScodeString(sc));
#endif
goto InitFailed;
}
// termination required when OleInitialize does not fail
pState->m_bNeedTerm = TRUE; // hook idle time and exit time for required OLE cleanup
CWinThread* pThread; pThread = AfxGetThread();
ASSERT(pThread);
pThread->m_lpfnOleTermOrFreeLib = AfxOleTermOrFreeLib; // allocate and initialize default message filter
if (pThread->m_pMessageFilter == NULL)
{
pThread->m_pMessageFilter = new COleMessageFilter;
ASSERT(AfxOleGetMessageFilter() != NULL);
AfxOleGetMessageFilter()->Register();
}
return TRUE; InitFailed:
AfxOleTerm();
return FALSE;
}
COM中CoInitializeEx 与CoInitialize的区别
CoInitialize、CoInitializeEx都是windows的API，主要是告诉windows以什么方式为程序创建COM对象，原因是程序调用com库函数（除CoGetMalloc和内存分配函数）之前必须初始化com库。
CoInitialize指明以单线程方式创建。
CoInitializeEx可以指定COINIT_MULTITHREADED以多线程方式创建。
创建单线程方式的COM服务器时不用考虑串行化问题，多线程COM服务器就要考虑。
CoInitialize并不装载com库，这个函数只是用来初始化当前线程使用什么样的套间。当使用这个函数以后，线程就和一个套间建立了对应关系。
线程的套间模式决定了该线程如何调用com对象，是否需要列集等
套间是com中用来解决并发调用冲突的很有效的办法
Before calling any COM functions, a thread needs to call CoInitialize to load the COM infrastructure (and to enter an apartment). Once a thread calls CoInitialize, the thread is free to call COM APIs.
CoInitializeEx provides the same functionality as CoInitialize and also provides a parameter to explicitly specify the thread's concurrency model. The current implementation of CoInitialize calls CoInitializeEx and specifies the concurrency model as single-thread apartment. Applications developed today should call CoInitializeEx rather than CoInitialize.
注：新的应用程序应该调用CoInitializeEx而不是CoInitialize，否则就会有必要在之后每个调用Com的线程中调用CoInitialize来初始化出每个线程自己的套间。