I have a WPF ListView with a collection of RadioButtons. I want to set the GroupName of the child controls to be bound to a property on the parent data context. At the moment I am doing this by duplicating the property in each of the children's data context but that can't be right.
我有一个WPF列表视图,其中包含一系列的radiobutton。我希望将子控件的GroupName设置为与父数据上下文中的属性绑定。目前,我正在通过在每个子数据上下文中复制属性来实现这一点,但这不可能是正确的。
My XAML:
我的XAML。
<ListView ItemsSource="{Binding OptionItems}" >
<ListView.ItemTemplate>
<DataTemplate DataType="{x:Type Logging:FilterOptionsRadioListViewModel}">
<RadioButton GroupName="{Binding GroupName}" Content="{Binding Option.Value}" Tag="{Binding Option.Key}" IsChecked="{Binding IsChecked}" Command="Logging:FilterOptionsRadioListViewModel.CheckedChangedCommand" />
</DataTemplate>
</ListView.ItemTemplate>
</ListView>
GroupName is a property on the parent View Model. I currently pass this onto the child View Model (where it is also a property) in the child constructor:
GroupName是父视图模型中的一个属性。我目前将它传递给子视图模型(在那里它也是一个属性),在子构造函数中:
var item = new FilterOptionsRadioListItemViewModel(option, this.GroupName);
What is the correct way of doing this?
正确的做法是什么?
3 个解决方案
#1
1
<ListView ItemsSource="{Binding OptionItems}" >
<ListView.ItemTemplate>
<DataTemplate DataType="{x:Type Logging:FilterOptionsRadioListViewModel}">
<RadioButton GroupName="{Binding RelativeSource={RelativeSource Mode=FindAncestor, AncestorType={x:Type ListView}}, Path=DataContext.GroupName}" Content="{Binding Option.Value}" Tag="{Binding Option.Key}" IsChecked="{Binding IsChecked}" Command="Logging:FilterOptionsRadioListViewModel.CheckedChangedCommand" />
</DataTemplate>
</ListView.ItemTemplate>
</ListView>
#2
0
You certainly can do that, but if you don't want to have to copy the GroupName to every child Option instance, you could instead do something like the following
您当然可以这样做,但是如果不希望将GroupName复制到每个子选项实例,您可以执行以下操作
// I'm imagining your viewmodels look something like this
public class ParentViewModel
{
private ObservableCollection<Option> m_OptionItems;
public ObservableCollection<Option> OptionItems
{
get { return m_OptionItems; }
set { m_OptionItems = value; }
}
private string m_ParentGroupName;
public string ParentGroupName
{
get { return m_ParentGroupName; }
set
{
m_ParentGroupName = value;
}
}
}
public class Option
{
private string m_Value;
public string Value
{
get { return m_Value; }
set
{
m_Value = value;
}
}
}
Then you can use a relative binding so you can look up the control tree to find the right datacontext, so you don't have to copy the ParentGroupName to each child Option instance.
然后您可以使用一个相对绑定,以便查找控制树以找到正确的datacontext,这样您就不必将ParentGroupName复制到每个子选项实例。
#3
0
If you name your window, you can traverse the root DataContext.
如果您给窗口命名,您可以遍历根DataContext。
<Window x:Class="MyNamespace.MainWindow"
Name="Window"
xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml/presentation"
xmlns:x="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml"
Title="MainWindow" Height="500" Width="725">
<ListView ItemsSource="{Binding OptionItems}" >
<ListView.ItemTemplate>
<DataTemplate DataType="{x:Type Logging:FilterOptionsRadioListViewModel}">
<RadioButton GroupName="{Binding ElementName=Window, Path=DataContext.ParentGroupName}" Content="{Binding Option.Value}" Tag="{Binding Option.Key}" IsChecked="{Binding IsChecked}" Command="Logging:FilterOptionsRadioListViewModel.CheckedChangedCommand" />
</DataTemplate>
</ListView.ItemTemplate>
</ListView>
#1
1
<ListView ItemsSource="{Binding OptionItems}" >
<ListView.ItemTemplate>
<DataTemplate DataType="{x:Type Logging:FilterOptionsRadioListViewModel}">
<RadioButton GroupName="{Binding RelativeSource={RelativeSource Mode=FindAncestor, AncestorType={x:Type ListView}}, Path=DataContext.GroupName}" Content="{Binding Option.Value}" Tag="{Binding Option.Key}" IsChecked="{Binding IsChecked}" Command="Logging:FilterOptionsRadioListViewModel.CheckedChangedCommand" />
</DataTemplate>
</ListView.ItemTemplate>
</ListView>
#2
0
You certainly can do that, but if you don't want to have to copy the GroupName to every child Option instance, you could instead do something like the following
您当然可以这样做,但是如果不希望将GroupName复制到每个子选项实例,您可以执行以下操作
// I'm imagining your viewmodels look something like this
public class ParentViewModel
{
private ObservableCollection<Option> m_OptionItems;
public ObservableCollection<Option> OptionItems
{
get { return m_OptionItems; }
set { m_OptionItems = value; }
}
private string m_ParentGroupName;
public string ParentGroupName
{
get { return m_ParentGroupName; }
set
{
m_ParentGroupName = value;
}
}
}
public class Option
{
private string m_Value;
public string Value
{
get { return m_Value; }
set
{
m_Value = value;
}
}
}
Then you can use a relative binding so you can look up the control tree to find the right datacontext, so you don't have to copy the ParentGroupName to each child Option instance.
然后您可以使用一个相对绑定,以便查找控制树以找到正确的datacontext,这样您就不必将ParentGroupName复制到每个子选项实例。
#3
0
If you name your window, you can traverse the root DataContext.
如果您给窗口命名,您可以遍历根DataContext。
<Window x:Class="MyNamespace.MainWindow"
Name="Window"
xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml/presentation"
xmlns:x="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml"
Title="MainWindow" Height="500" Width="725">
<ListView ItemsSource="{Binding OptionItems}" >
<ListView.ItemTemplate>
<DataTemplate DataType="{x:Type Logging:FilterOptionsRadioListViewModel}">
<RadioButton GroupName="{Binding ElementName=Window, Path=DataContext.ParentGroupName}" Content="{Binding Option.Value}" Tag="{Binding Option.Key}" IsChecked="{Binding IsChecked}" Command="Logging:FilterOptionsRadioListViewModel.CheckedChangedCommand" />
</DataTemplate>
</ListView.ItemTemplate>
</ListView>