I have a hierarchy where Square, Triangle and Circle all extend from Shape. I have a working method:
我有一个层次结构,其中Square,Triangle和Circle都从Shape扩展。我有一个工作方法:
public void someMethod() {
File file = new File("File_with_squares");
ThirdPartyClass foo = new ThirdPartyClass();
Square[] squares = foo.someMajicMethod(Square[].class,file);
for (Square square: squares)
square.draw();
}
Now I want to make this method generic so that it can accept any shape. I want to be able to call it someMethod(Triangle.class,new File("File_with_triangles")
or someMethod(Circle.class, new File("File_with_circles")
. I am trying like this:
现在我想使这个方法通用,以便它可以接受任何形状。我希望能够将其称为someMethod(Triangle.class,新文件(“File_with_triangles”)或someMethod(Circle.class,新文件(“File_with_circles”)。我正在尝试这样:
public void someMethod(Class<? extends Shape> type, File shapeFile) {
ThirdPartyClass foo = new ThirdPartyClass();
#### What goes here??? ####
for (Shape shape: shapes)
shape.draw();
}
What should be there at #### What goes here??? #### ???
应该在####那里有什么? #### ???
3 个解决方案
#1
3
Assuming ThirdPartClass.someMajicMethod has a signature something like this:
假设ThirdPartClass.someMajicMethod有这样的签名:
public <T> T someMajicMethod(Class<T> class1, File file);
Then you should be able to do something like this:
然后你应该能够做这样的事情:
public void someMethod(Class<? extends Shape> type, File shapeFile) {
ThirdPartyClass foo = new ThirdPartyClass();
@SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
Class<? extends Shape[]> arrayType =
(Class<? extends Shape[]>) Array.newInstance(type, 0).getClass();
assert Shape[].class.isAssignableFrom(arrayType);
Shape[] shapes = foo.someMajicMethod(arrayType, shapeFile);
for (Shape shape: shapes)
shape.draw();
}
So if you call someMethod(Triangle.class, file)
, then arrayType
will be Triangle[].class
in the call to someMajicMethod
.
所以如果你调用someMethod(Triangle.class,file),那么在调用someMajicMethod时,arrayType将是Triangle [] .class。
Though you may find it simpler to have someMethod take the array type as a parameter instead of the element type so you can avoid that step.
虽然您可能会发现让someMethod将数组类型作为参数而不是元素类型更简单,因此您可以避免该步骤。
#3
3
Shape[] shapes = foo.someMajicMethod(type, file);
If foo
is a third-party class, I assume you don't control the API of it. I assumed it has the appropriate method signature to handle the line I've written but there is no way for me to be certain without more information about that class.
如果foo是第三方类,我假设你不控制它的API。我假设它有适当的方法签名来处理我写过的行,但是如果没有关于该类的更多信息,我无法确定。
If this doesn't work, what is the problem?
如果这不起作用,问题是什么?
#1
3
Assuming ThirdPartClass.someMajicMethod has a signature something like this:
假设ThirdPartClass.someMajicMethod有这样的签名:
public <T> T someMajicMethod(Class<T> class1, File file);
Then you should be able to do something like this:
然后你应该能够做这样的事情:
public void someMethod(Class<? extends Shape> type, File shapeFile) {
ThirdPartyClass foo = new ThirdPartyClass();
@SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
Class<? extends Shape[]> arrayType =
(Class<? extends Shape[]>) Array.newInstance(type, 0).getClass();
assert Shape[].class.isAssignableFrom(arrayType);
Shape[] shapes = foo.someMajicMethod(arrayType, shapeFile);
for (Shape shape: shapes)
shape.draw();
}
So if you call someMethod(Triangle.class, file)
, then arrayType
will be Triangle[].class
in the call to someMajicMethod
.
所以如果你调用someMethod(Triangle.class,file),那么在调用someMajicMethod时,arrayType将是Triangle [] .class。
Though you may find it simpler to have someMethod take the array type as a parameter instead of the element type so you can avoid that step.
虽然您可能会发现让someMethod将数组类型作为参数而不是元素类型更简单,因此您可以避免该步骤。
#2
#3
3
Shape[] shapes = foo.someMajicMethod(type, file);
If foo
is a third-party class, I assume you don't control the API of it. I assumed it has the appropriate method signature to handle the line I've written but there is no way for me to be certain without more information about that class.
如果foo是第三方类,我假设你不控制它的API。我假设它有适当的方法签名来处理我写过的行,但是如果没有关于该类的更多信息,我无法确定。
If this doesn't work, what is the problem?
如果这不起作用,问题是什么?