UNIQUE,UNIQUE KEY和CONSTRAINT'name'UNIQUE有什么区别?

时间:2022-09-15 23:59:24

I have a basic 'users' table I want to create in MySQL.

我有一个基本的“用户”表,我想在MySQL中创建。

I do not want duplicate emails or duplicate usernames appearing in the database.

我不希望在数据库中出现重复的电子邮件或重复的用户名。

  • What is the best way of preventing this upon table creation?
  • 在创建桌子时防止这种情况的最佳方法是什么?
  • And what is the difference between the following:
  • 以下是有什么区别的:

1. UNIQUE (username), UNIQUE (email),

1. UNIQUE(用户名),UNIQUE(电子邮件),

2. UNIQUE KEY (username), UNIQUE KEY (email),

2. UNIQUE KEY(用户名),UNIQUE KEY(电子邮件),

3. CONSTRAINT ucons_login UNIQUE (username, email),

3. CONSTRAINT ucons_login UNIQUE(用户名,电子邮件),

I assume some of these are synonymous, yet I've been reading conflicting information online and was seeking confirmation.

我假设其中一些是同义词,但我一直在网上阅读相互矛盾的信息,并正在寻求确认。

I hope someone can assist.

我希望有人可以提供帮助。

The SQL:

SQL:

CREATE TABLE users (
user_id INT UNSIGNED NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
username VARCHAR(30) NOT NULL,
pass CHAR(40) NOT NULL,
first_name VARCHAR(20) NOT NULL,
last_name VARCHAR(40) NOT NULL,
email VARCHAR(60) NOT NULL,
registration_date DATETIME NOT NULL,
user_level TINYINT(1) UNSIGNED NOT NULL DEFAULT 0,
active CHAR(32),
PRIMARY KEY (user_id),
UNIQUE (username),
UNIQUE (email),
INDEX login (email, pass),
INDEX full_name (last_name, first_name)
) ENGINE=INNODB;

2 个解决方案

#1


14  

1 and 2 are identical - both create two unique indexes, one for each key. #3 only creates one unique index across both keys, so no combination of username and email can be duplicated, but for example, a username could be duplicated as long as a different email was used.

1和2是相同的 - 都创建了两个唯一索引,每个索引一个。 #3仅在两个密钥上创建一个唯一索引,因此不能复制用户名和电子邮件的组合,但是,例如,只要使用不同的电子邮件,就可以复制用户名。

Sounds like you probably want either of the first two. UNIQUE and UNIQUE KEY are equivalent.

听起来你可能想要前两个中的任何一个。 UNIQUE和UNIQUE KEY是等价的。

#2


1  

They are all synonymous as evidenced by syntax documentation:

它们都是同义词,如语法文档所示:

[CONSTRAINT [symbol]] UNIQUE [INDEX|KEY] [index_name] [index_type] (index_col_name,...) [index_option]

[CONSTRAINT [symbol]] UNIQUE [INDEX | KEY] [index_name] [index_type](index_col_name,...)[index_option]

[] in this notation (Wirth's notation) denote optional elements

[]符号(Wirth的符号)表示可选元素

#1


14  

1 and 2 are identical - both create two unique indexes, one for each key. #3 only creates one unique index across both keys, so no combination of username and email can be duplicated, but for example, a username could be duplicated as long as a different email was used.

1和2是相同的 - 都创建了两个唯一索引,每个索引一个。 #3仅在两个密钥上创建一个唯一索引,因此不能复制用户名和电子邮件的组合,但是,例如,只要使用不同的电子邮件,就可以复制用户名。

Sounds like you probably want either of the first two. UNIQUE and UNIQUE KEY are equivalent.

听起来你可能想要前两个中的任何一个。 UNIQUE和UNIQUE KEY是等价的。

#2


1  

They are all synonymous as evidenced by syntax documentation:

它们都是同义词,如语法文档所示:

[CONSTRAINT [symbol]] UNIQUE [INDEX|KEY] [index_name] [index_type] (index_col_name,...) [index_option]

[CONSTRAINT [symbol]] UNIQUE [INDEX | KEY] [index_name] [index_type](index_col_name,...)[index_option]

[] in this notation (Wirth's notation) denote optional elements

[]符号(Wirth的符号)表示可选元素