I have a set of indexed fields such as these:
我有一组索引字段，如下所示：
submitted_form_2200FA17-AF7A-4E44-9749-79D3A391A1AF:true
submitted_form_2200FA17-AF7A-4E44-9749-79D3A391A1AF：真
submitted_form_2398389-2-32-43242423:true
submitted_form_2398389-2-32-43242423：真
submitted_form_54543-32SDf-3242340-32422:true
submitted_form_54543-32SDf-3242340-32422：真
And I get that it's possible to wildcard queries such as
而且我知道可以使用诸如的通配符查询
submitted_form_2398389-2-32-43242423:t*e
submitted_form_2398389-2-32-43242423：T * E
What I'm trying to do is get "any" submitted form via something like:
我想要做的是通过以下方式获得“任何”提交的表格：
submitted_form_*:true
submitted_form _ *：真
Is this possible? Or will I have to do a stream of "OR"s on the known forms (which seems quite heavy)
这可能吗？或者我是否必须在已知形式上进行“OR”流（看起来很重）
1 个解决方案
#1
1
That's not the intended use of fields, I think. Field names aren't supposed to be the searchable values, field values are. Field names are supposed to be known a priori.
我认为这不是字段的预期用途。字段名称不应该是可搜索的值，字段值是。字段名称应该是先验已知的。
My suggestion is (if possible) to store the second part of the name as the field value, for instance: submitted_form:2398389-2-32-43242423. submitted_from would be the field known a priori, and the value could eventually be searched with a PrefixQuery.
我的建议是（如果可能的话）将名称的第二部分存储为字段值，例如：submitted_form：2398389-2-32-43242423。 submitted_from将是先验已知的字段，并且最终可以使用PrefixQuery搜索该值。
Anyway, you could access the collection of fields' names using IndexReader.getFieldNames() in Lucene 3.x and this in Lucene 4.x. I wouldn't expect search performance there.
无论如何，你可以使用Lucene 3.x中的IndexReader.getFieldNames（）和Lucene 4.x中的字段名称集合。我不希望那里的搜索性能。
#1
1
That's not the intended use of fields, I think. Field names aren't supposed to be the searchable values, field values are. Field names are supposed to be known a priori.
我认为这不是字段的预期用途。字段名称不应该是可搜索的值，字段值是。字段名称应该是先验已知的。
My suggestion is (if possible) to store the second part of the name as the field value, for instance: submitted_form:2398389-2-32-43242423. submitted_from would be the field known a priori, and the value could eventually be searched with a PrefixQuery.
我的建议是（如果可能的话）将名称的第二部分存储为字段值，例如：submitted_form：2398389-2-32-43242423。 submitted_from将是先验已知的字段，并且最终可以使用PrefixQuery搜索该值。
Anyway, you could access the collection of fields' names using IndexReader.getFieldNames() in Lucene 3.x and this in Lucene 4.x. I wouldn't expect search performance there.
无论如何，你可以使用Lucene 3.x中的IndexReader.getFieldNames（）和Lucene 4.x中的字段名称集合。我不希望那里的搜索性能。