Here's what can be done in C# -
以下是C#中可以做的事情 -
var two = 2;
System.Linq.Expressions.Expression<System.Func<int, int>> expr = x => x * two;
expr.Compile().Invoke(4); // returns 8
I wish to do the precise equivalent in F#. Here's what I tried, but did not compile -
我希望在F#中做到精确的等价物。这是我尝试过的,但没有编译 -
let two = 2
let expr = (fun x -> x * two) : System.Linq.Expressions.Expression<System.Func<int, int>>
expr.Compile().Invoke(4) // desired to return 8
Perhaps predictably, compilation fails on line 2 with the following error -
也许可以预见,编译在第2行失败,出现以下错误 -
"This function takes too many arguments, or is used in a context where a function is not expected."
let expr = (fun x -> x * two) : System.Linq.Expressions.Expression<System.Func<int, int>>
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
1 个解决方案
#1
18
I'm not sure why you want to avoid using F# quotations - under the cover, they are pretty much the same thing as C# expression trees and if you want to create an expression tree in F#, the compiler will be using quotations under the cover in any case...
我不确定为什么要避免使用F#引用 - 在封面下,它们与C#表达式树几乎相同,如果要在F#中创建表达式树,编译器将在封面下使用引号任何状况之下...
Anyway, you can do this without writing explicit <@ .. @>
because the compiler can automatically quote a function when it is passed as an argument to a method. So you can do:
无论如何,您可以在不编写显式<@ .. @>的情况下执行此操作,因为编译器可以在将函数作为参数传递给方法时自动引用该函数。所以你可以这样做:
type Expr =
static member Quote(e:Expression<System.Func<int, int>>) = e
let two = 2
let expr = Expr.Quote(fun x -> x * two)
expr.Compile().Invoke(4) // desired to return 8
EDIT: However, this really compiles to an F# quotation wrapped in a call that converts it to C# expression tree. So, in the end, you'll get the same thing as if you wrote:
编辑:但是,这实际上编译为包含在调用中的F#引用,该调用将其转换为C#表达式树。所以,最后,你会得到和你写的一样:
open Microsoft.FSharp.Linq.RuntimeHelpers
let two = 2
let expr =
<@ System.Func<_, _>(fun x -> x * two) @>
|> LeafExpressionConverter.QuotationToExpression
|> unbox<Expression<Func<int, int>>>
expr.Compile().Invoke(4) // desired to return 8
#1
18
I'm not sure why you want to avoid using F# quotations - under the cover, they are pretty much the same thing as C# expression trees and if you want to create an expression tree in F#, the compiler will be using quotations under the cover in any case...
我不确定为什么要避免使用F#引用 - 在封面下,它们与C#表达式树几乎相同,如果要在F#中创建表达式树,编译器将在封面下使用引号任何状况之下...
Anyway, you can do this without writing explicit <@ .. @>
because the compiler can automatically quote a function when it is passed as an argument to a method. So you can do:
无论如何,您可以在不编写显式<@ .. @>的情况下执行此操作,因为编译器可以在将函数作为参数传递给方法时自动引用该函数。所以你可以这样做:
type Expr =
static member Quote(e:Expression<System.Func<int, int>>) = e
let two = 2
let expr = Expr.Quote(fun x -> x * two)
expr.Compile().Invoke(4) // desired to return 8
EDIT: However, this really compiles to an F# quotation wrapped in a call that converts it to C# expression tree. So, in the end, you'll get the same thing as if you wrote:
编辑:但是,这实际上编译为包含在调用中的F#引用,该调用将其转换为C#表达式树。所以,最后,你会得到和你写的一样:
open Microsoft.FSharp.Linq.RuntimeHelpers
let two = 2
let expr =
<@ System.Func<_, _>(fun x -> x * two) @>
|> LeafExpressionConverter.QuotationToExpression
|> unbox<Expression<Func<int, int>>>
expr.Compile().Invoke(4) // desired to return 8