Is there any material difference between:
以下是否有任何实质性差异:
<script type="text/javascript" src="/script.js" async></script>
and
(function() {
var s = document.createElement('script');
s.type = 'text/javascript';
s.async = true;
s.src = 'script.js';
var x = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0];
x.parentNode.insertBefore(s, x)
;})();
?
1 个解决方案
#1
I can only quote MDN:
我只能引用MDN:
In older browsers that don't support the
async
attribute, parser-inserted scripts block the parser; script-inserted scripts execute asynchronously in IE and WebKit, but synchronously in Opera and pre-4.0 Firefox.在不支持async属性的旧浏览器中,插入解析器的脚本会阻止解析器;脚本插入的脚本在IE和WebKit中异步执行,但在Opera和4.0之前的Firefox中同步执行。
So in other words, the second one will still evaluate the script asynchronously in older IE and WebKit browsers.
换句话说,第二个仍将在较旧的IE和WebKit浏览器中异步评估脚本。
#1
I can only quote MDN:
我只能引用MDN:
In older browsers that don't support the
async
attribute, parser-inserted scripts block the parser; script-inserted scripts execute asynchronously in IE and WebKit, but synchronously in Opera and pre-4.0 Firefox.在不支持async属性的旧浏览器中,插入解析器的脚本会阻止解析器;脚本插入的脚本在IE和WebKit中异步执行,但在Opera和4.0之前的Firefox中同步执行。
So in other words, the second one will still evaluate the script asynchronously in older IE and WebKit browsers.
换句话说,第二个仍将在较旧的IE和WebKit浏览器中异步评估脚本。