ui-router 0.2.11 / AngularJS 1.3.0
ui-路由器0.2.11 / AngularJS 1.3.0。
I struggle to understand why my $stateChangeSuccess event handler in BarCtrl is not triggered on #/foo/bar. It is triggered on #/bar.
我很难理解为什么我的$stateChangeSuccess事件处理程序在BarCtrl中不是由#/foo/bar触发的。它是由#/bar触发的。
#/foo/bar -> Console: foo
#/bar -> Console: bar
What I'm trying to achieve is that on #/foo/bar first FooCtrl's handler is triggered and then BarCtrl's:
我想要实现的是,在#/foo/bar的第一个FooCtrl的处理程序被触发,然后BarCtrl's:
foo
bar
My code:
我的代码:
var app = angular.module('foobar', ['restangular', 'ui.bootstrap', 'ui.router'])
app.config(function($stateProvider, $urlRouterProvider) {
$stateProvider.state('root', {
url: "/",
template: '<div ui-view></div>'
})
.state('foo', {
abstract: true,
url: "/foo",
controller: 'FooCtrl',
})
.state('foo.bar', {
url: "/bar",
controller: 'BarCtrl',
})
.state('bar', {
url: "/bar",
controller: 'BarCtrl',
});
})
app.controller('FooCtrl', function($scope) {
$scope.$on('$stateChangeSuccess', function(event, toState, toParams, fromState, fromParams){
console.log("foo");
});
});
app.controller('BarCtrl', function($scope) {
$scope.$on('$stateChangeSuccess', function(event, toState, toParams, fromState, fromParams){
console.log('bar')
});
});
2 个解决方案
#1
3
While preparing a fiddle I came across my mistakes. I was thinking abstract views would not need a template since they cannot be accessed and assuming the template of foo's parent state would take over, which is not the case.
在准备小提琴的时候,我偶然发现了我的错误。我认为抽象视图不需要模板,因为它们不能被访问,并且假定foo的父状态的模板会接管,但事实并非如此。
To achieve what I wanted I only had to add:
为了达到我想要的,我只需要加上:
template: '<ui-view />',
Like so:
像这样:
.state('foo', {
abstract: true,
url: "/foo",
controller: 'FooCtrl',
template: '<ui-view />',
})
A related discussion: https://github.com/angular-ui/ui-router/issues/325
相关讨论:https://github.com/angular-ui/ui-router/issues/325
#2
-2
You're not specifying the url of #/foo/bar is all.
您没有指定#/foo/bar的url。
You are specifying the state of foo.bar, but the state is only being accessed from the url of #/bar.
您正在指定foo的状态。bar,但是状态只能从#/bar的url访问。
Change the following...
改变以下…
.state('foo.bar', {
url: "/bar",
controller: 'BarCtrl',
})
... to ...
………
.state('foo.bar', {
url: "/foo/bar",
controller: 'BarCtrl',
})
... and you should be good.
…你应该很好。
#1
3
While preparing a fiddle I came across my mistakes. I was thinking abstract views would not need a template since they cannot be accessed and assuming the template of foo's parent state would take over, which is not the case.
在准备小提琴的时候,我偶然发现了我的错误。我认为抽象视图不需要模板,因为它们不能被访问,并且假定foo的父状态的模板会接管,但事实并非如此。
To achieve what I wanted I only had to add:
为了达到我想要的,我只需要加上:
template: '<ui-view />',
Like so:
像这样:
.state('foo', {
abstract: true,
url: "/foo",
controller: 'FooCtrl',
template: '<ui-view />',
})
A related discussion: https://github.com/angular-ui/ui-router/issues/325
相关讨论:https://github.com/angular-ui/ui-router/issues/325
#2
-2
You're not specifying the url of #/foo/bar is all.
您没有指定#/foo/bar的url。
You are specifying the state of foo.bar, but the state is only being accessed from the url of #/bar.
您正在指定foo的状态。bar,但是状态只能从#/bar的url访问。
Change the following...
改变以下…
.state('foo.bar', {
url: "/bar",
controller: 'BarCtrl',
})
... to ...
………
.state('foo.bar', {
url: "/foo/bar",
controller: 'BarCtrl',
})
... and you should be good.
…你应该很好。