I'm having a JSON Collection
我有一个JSON集合
$scope.person = [
{
"Id": 1
"Name": "John"
},
{
"Id": 2
"Name": "Jack"
},
{
"Id": 3
"Name": "Watson"
},
];
I'm having two HTML Select with same JSON Collection. I Selected a Person Watson in the First Select "Person", then I need to update the Same in the Second HTML Select "Copy Person". But I Can't able to update.
我有两个带有相同JSON Collection的HTML Select。我在第一个选择“人物”中选择了一个人沃森,然后我需要在第二个HTML中更新相同的选择“复制人”。但我无法更新。
I bind the JSON Object as a Value in the HTML Select instead of Id
or Name
我将JSON对象绑定为HTML Select中的值,而不是Id或Name
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<title>HTML Select using AngularJS</title>
<script src="http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/angularjs/1.4.8/angular.min.js"></script>
</head>
<body>
<div ng-app="myApp" ng-controller="myCtrl">
<div class="md-block">
<label>Person</label>
<select ng-model="selected.person">
<option ng-repeat="key in person | orderBy:Id" value="{{key}}">({{key.Name}})</option>
</select>
</div>
<hr />
<div class="md-block">
<label>Copy Person</label>
<select ng-model="selected.copy_person">
<option ng-repeat="key in person | orderBy:Id" value="{{key}}">({{key.Name}})</option>
</select>
</div>
</div>
<script>
var app = angular.module('myApp', []);
app.controller('myCtrl', function ($scope) {
$scope.person = [
{
"Id": 1,
"Name": "John"
},
{
"Id": 2,
"Name": "Jack"
},
{
"Id": 3,
"Name": "Watson"
}
];
$scope.selected = {
person: null,
copy_person:null
};
$scope.$watchCollection('selected.person', function (newData, oldDaata) {
var obj = JSON.parse(newData);
if ((obj != undefined) && (obj != null) && (obj.Id != undefined) && (obj.Id != null) && (obj.Id != "0")) {
var name = obj.Name;
alert(name);
$scope.selected.copy_person = obj;
}
});
});
</script>
</body>
</html>
Here I used $scope.$watchCollection
to update the Copy Person
这里我用$ scope。$ watchCollection来更新Copy Person
$scope.$watchCollection('selected.person', function (newData, oldDaata) {
var obj = JSON.parse(newData);
if ((obj != undefined) && (obj != null) && (obj.Id != undefined) && (obj.Id != null) && (obj.Id != "0")) {
var name = obj.Name;
alert(name);
$scope.selected.copy_person = obj;
}
});
My Code fails to update in the Second Select. Kindly assist me how to update...
我的代码无法在第二次选择中更新。请帮助我如何更新......
2 个解决方案
#1
1
This is the code you must use, ng-options is made for this:
这是你必须使用的代码,为此做了ng-options:
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<title>HTML Select using AngularJS</title>
<script src="http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/angularjs/1.4.8/angular.min.js"></script>
</head>
<body>
<div ng-app="myApp" ng-controller="myCtrl">
<div class="md-block">
<label>Person</label>
<select ng-model="selected.person" ng-options="p as p.Name for p in person">
</select>
</div>
<hr />
<div class="md-block">
<label>Copy Person</label>
<select ng-model="selected.copy_person" ng-options="p as p.Name for p in person">
</select>
</div>
</div>
<script>
var app = angular.module('myApp', []);
app.controller('myCtrl', function ($scope) {
$scope.person = [
{
"Id": 1,
"Name": "John"
},
{
"Id": 2,
"Name": "Jack"
},
{
"Id": 3,
"Name": "Watson"
}
];
$scope.selected = {
person: null,
copy_person:null
};
$scope.$watchCollection('selected.person', function (newData, oldDaata) {
var obj = newData;
if ((obj != undefined) && (obj != null) && (obj.Id != undefined) && (obj.Id != null) && (obj.Id != "0")) {
var name = obj.Name;
alert(name);
$scope.selected.copy_person = obj;
}
});
});
</script>
</body>
</html>
#2
1
Dont use ng-repeat for create the second select, do something like that:
不要使用ng-repeat创建第二个选择,执行类似的操作:
<div class="md-block">
<label>Person</label>
<select ng-model="selected.person">
<option ng-repeat="key in person | orderBy:Id" value="{{key}}">({{key.Name}})</option>
</select>
</div>
<hr />
<div class="md-block">
<label>Copy Person</label>
<select ng-model="selected.copy_person" ng-options="obj.Name for obj in person track by obj.Name">
</select>
</div>
This is exactly why you should not use ngRepeat with to render select options. In many cases, ngRepeat can be used on elements instead of ngOptions to achieve a similar result. However, ngOptions provides more benefits:
这正是您不应该使用ngRepeat来渲染选择选项的原因。在许多情况下,可以在元素上使用ngRepeat而不是ngOptions来实现类似的结果。但是,ngOptions提供了更多好处:
- more flexibility in how the 's model is assigned via the select as part of the comprehension expression
- 通过select作为理解表达式的一部分,可以更灵活地分配模型
- reduced memory consumption by not creating a new scope for each repeated instance
- 通过不为每个重复实例创建新范围来减少内存消耗
- increased render speed by creating the options in a documentFragment instead of individually. You should use ngOptions instead.
- 通过在documentFragment中创建选项而不是单独创建选项来提高渲染速度。您应该使用ngOptions。
If you don't want to use the better way, ng-options, you can add ng-selected attribute with a condition check logic for the option directive to to make the pre-select work!
如果您不想使用更好的方法ng-options,可以使用选项指令的条件检查逻辑添加ng-selected属性,以便进行预选工作!
#1
1
This is the code you must use, ng-options is made for this:
这是你必须使用的代码,为此做了ng-options:
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<title>HTML Select using AngularJS</title>
<script src="http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/angularjs/1.4.8/angular.min.js"></script>
</head>
<body>
<div ng-app="myApp" ng-controller="myCtrl">
<div class="md-block">
<label>Person</label>
<select ng-model="selected.person" ng-options="p as p.Name for p in person">
</select>
</div>
<hr />
<div class="md-block">
<label>Copy Person</label>
<select ng-model="selected.copy_person" ng-options="p as p.Name for p in person">
</select>
</div>
</div>
<script>
var app = angular.module('myApp', []);
app.controller('myCtrl', function ($scope) {
$scope.person = [
{
"Id": 1,
"Name": "John"
},
{
"Id": 2,
"Name": "Jack"
},
{
"Id": 3,
"Name": "Watson"
}
];
$scope.selected = {
person: null,
copy_person:null
};
$scope.$watchCollection('selected.person', function (newData, oldDaata) {
var obj = newData;
if ((obj != undefined) && (obj != null) && (obj.Id != undefined) && (obj.Id != null) && (obj.Id != "0")) {
var name = obj.Name;
alert(name);
$scope.selected.copy_person = obj;
}
});
});
</script>
</body>
</html>
#2
1
Dont use ng-repeat for create the second select, do something like that:
不要使用ng-repeat创建第二个选择,执行类似的操作:
<div class="md-block">
<label>Person</label>
<select ng-model="selected.person">
<option ng-repeat="key in person | orderBy:Id" value="{{key}}">({{key.Name}})</option>
</select>
</div>
<hr />
<div class="md-block">
<label>Copy Person</label>
<select ng-model="selected.copy_person" ng-options="obj.Name for obj in person track by obj.Name">
</select>
</div>
This is exactly why you should not use ngRepeat with to render select options. In many cases, ngRepeat can be used on elements instead of ngOptions to achieve a similar result. However, ngOptions provides more benefits:
这正是您不应该使用ngRepeat来渲染选择选项的原因。在许多情况下,可以在元素上使用ngRepeat而不是ngOptions来实现类似的结果。但是,ngOptions提供了更多好处:
- more flexibility in how the 's model is assigned via the select as part of the comprehension expression
- 通过select作为理解表达式的一部分,可以更灵活地分配模型
- reduced memory consumption by not creating a new scope for each repeated instance
- 通过不为每个重复实例创建新范围来减少内存消耗
- increased render speed by creating the options in a documentFragment instead of individually. You should use ngOptions instead.
- 通过在documentFragment中创建选项而不是单独创建选项来提高渲染速度。您应该使用ngOptions。
If you don't want to use the better way, ng-options, you can add ng-selected attribute with a condition check logic for the option directive to to make the pre-select work!
如果您不想使用更好的方法ng-options,可以使用选项指令的条件检查逻辑添加ng-selected属性,以便进行预选工作!