因为一直用spring整合了mybatis,所以很少用到mybatis的session缓存。 习惯是本地缓存自己用map写或者引入第三方的本地缓存框架ehcache,Guava
所以提出来纠结下
实验下(spring整合mybatis略,网上一堆),先看看mybatis级别的session的缓存
放出打印sql语句
configuration.xml 加入
1
2
3
4
|
<settings>
<!-- 打印查询语句 -->
<setting name= "logImpl" value= "STDOUT_LOGGING" />
</settings>
|
测试源代码如下:
dao类
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
|
/**
* 测试spring里的mybatis为啥用不上缓存
*
* @author 何锦彬 2017.02.15
*/
@Component
public class TestDao {
private Logger logger = Logger.getLogger(TestDao. class .getName());
@Autowired
private SqlSessionTemplate sqlSessionTemplate;
@Autowired
private SqlSessionFactory sqlSessionFactory;
/**
* 两次SQL
*
* @param id
* @return
*/
public TestDto selectBySpring(String id) {
TestDto testDto = (TestDto) sqlSessionTemplate.selectOne( "com.hejb.TestDto.selectByPrimaryKey" , id);
testDto = (TestDto) sqlSessionTemplate.selectOne( "com.hejb.TestDto.selectByPrimaryKey" , id);
return testDto;
}
/**
* 一次SQL
*
* @param id
* @return
*/
public TestDto selectByMybatis(String id) {
SqlSession session = sqlSessionFactory.openSession();
TestDto testDto = session.selectOne( "com.hejb.TestDto.selectByPrimaryKey" , id);
testDto = session.selectOne( "com.hejb.TestDto.selectByPrimaryKey" , id);
return testDto;
}
}
|
测试service类
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
|
@Component
public class TestService {
@Autowired
private TestDao testDao;
/**
* 未开启事务的spring Mybatis查询
*/
public void testSpringCashe() {
//查询了两次SQL
testDao.selectBySpring( "1" );
}
/**
* 开启事务的spring Mybatis查询
*/
@Transactional
public void testSpringCasheWithTran() {
//spring开启事务后,查询1次SQL
testDao.selectBySpring( "1" );
}
/**
* mybatis查询
*/
public void testCash4Mybatise() {
//原生态mybatis,查询了1次SQL
testDao.selectByMybatis( "1" );
}
}
|
输出结果:
testSpringCashe()方法执行了两次SQL, 其它都是一次
源码追踪:
先看mybatis里的sqlSession
跟踪到最后 调用到 org.apache.ibatis.executor.BaseExecutor的query方法
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
|
try {
queryStack++;
list = resultHandler == null ? (List<E>) localCache.getObject(key) : null ; //先从缓存中取
if (list != null ) {
handleLocallyCachedOutputParameters(ms, key, parameter, boundSql); //注意里面的key是CacheKey
} else {
list = queryFromDatabase(ms, parameter, rowBounds, resultHandler, key, boundSql);
}
|
贴下是怎么取出缓存数据的代码
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
|
private void handleLocallyCachedOutputParameters(MappedStatement ms, CacheKey key, Object parameter, BoundSql boundSql) {
if (ms.getStatementType() == StatementType.CALLABLE) {
final Object cachedParameter = localOutputParameterCache.getObject(key); //从localOutputParameterCache取出缓存对象
if (cachedParameter != null && parameter != null ) {
final MetaObject metaCachedParameter = configuration.newMetaObject(cachedParameter);
final MetaObject metaParameter = configuration.newMetaObject(parameter);
for (ParameterMapping parameterMapping : boundSql.getParameterMappings()) {
if (parameterMapping.getMode() != ParameterMode.IN) {
final String parameterName = parameterMapping.getProperty();
final Object cachedValue = metaCachedParameter.getValue(parameterName);
metaParameter.setValue(parameterName, cachedValue);
}
}
}
}
}
|
发现就是从localOutputParameterCache就是一个PerpetualCache, PerpetualCache维护了个map,就是session的缓存本质了。
重点可以关注下面两个累的逻辑
PerpetualCache , 两个参数, id和map
CacheKey,map中存的key,它有覆盖equas方法,当获取缓存时调用.
这种本地map缓存获取对象的缺点,就我踩坑经验(以前我也用map去实现的本地缓存),就是获取的对象非clone的,返回的两个对象都是一个地址
而在spring中一般都是用sqlSessionTemplate,如下
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
|
<bean id= "sqlSessionFactory" class = "org.mybatis.spring.SqlSessionFactoryBean" >
<property name= "dataSource" ref= "dataSource" />
<property name= "configLocation" value= "classpath:configuration.xml" />
<property name= "mapperLocations" >
<list>
<value>classpath*:com/hejb/sqlmap/*.xml</value>
</list>
</property>
</bean>
<bean id= "sqlSessionTemplate" class = "org.mybatis.spring.SqlSessionTemplate" >
<constructor-arg ref= "sqlSessionFactory" />
</bean>
|
在SqlSessionTemplate中执行SQL的session都是通过sqlSessionProxy来,sqlSessionProxy的生成在构造函数中赋值,如下:
1
2
3
4
|
this .sqlSessionProxy = (SqlSession) newProxyInstance(
SqlSessionFactory. class .getClassLoader(),
new Class[] { SqlSession. class },
new SqlSessionInterceptor());
|
sqlSessionProxy通过JDK的动态代理方法生成的一个代理类,主要逻辑在InvocationHandler对执行的方法进行了前后拦截,主要逻辑在invoke中,包好了每次执行对sqlsesstion的创建,common,关闭
代码如下:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
|
private class SqlSessionInterceptor implements InvocationHandler {
@Override
public Object invoke(Object proxy, Method method, Object[] args) throws Throwable {
// 每次执行前都创建一个新的sqlSession
SqlSession sqlSession = getSqlSession(
SqlSessionTemplate. this .sqlSessionFactory,
SqlSessionTemplate. this .executorType,
SqlSessionTemplate. this .exceptionTranslator);
try {
// 执行方法
Object result = method.invoke(sqlSession, args);
if (!isSqlSessionTransactional(sqlSession, SqlSessionTemplate. this .sqlSessionFactory)) {
// force commit even on non-dirty sessions because some databases require
// a commit/rollback before calling close()
sqlSession.commit( true );
}
return result;
} catch (Throwable t) {
Throwable unwrapped = unwrapThrowable(t);
if (SqlSessionTemplate. this .exceptionTranslator != null && unwrapped instanceof PersistenceException) {
// release the connection to avoid a deadlock if the translator is no loaded. See issue #22
closeSqlSession(sqlSession, SqlSessionTemplate. this .sqlSessionFactory);
sqlSession = null ;
Throwable translated = SqlSessionTemplate. this .exceptionTranslator.translateExceptionIfPossible((PersistenceException) unwrapped);
if (translated != null ) {
unwrapped = translated;
}
}
throw unwrapped;
} finally {
if (sqlSession != null ) {
closeSqlSession(sqlSession, SqlSessionTemplate. this .sqlSessionFactory);
}
}
}
}
|
因为每次都进行创建,所以就用不上sqlSession的缓存了.
对于开启了事务为什么可以用上呢, 跟入getSqlSession方法
如下:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
|
public static SqlSession getSqlSession(SqlSessionFactory sessionFactory, ExecutorType executorType, PersistenceExceptionTranslator exceptionTranslator) {
notNull(sessionFactory, NO_SQL_SESSION_FACTORY_SPECIFIED);
notNull(executorType, NO_EXECUTOR_TYPE_SPECIFIED);
SqlSessionHolder holder = (SqlSessionHolder) TransactionSynchronizationManager.getResource(sessionFactory);
// 首先从SqlSessionHolder里取出session
SqlSession session = sessionHolder(executorType, holder);
if (session != null ) {
return session;
}
if (LOGGER.isDebugEnabled()) {
LOGGER.debug( "Creating a new SqlSession" );
}
session = sessionFactory.openSession(executorType);
registerSessionHolder(sessionFactory, executorType, exceptionTranslator, session);
return session;
}
|
在里面维护了个SqlSessionHolder,关联了事务与session,如果存在则直接取出,否则则新建个session,所以在有事务的里,每个session都是同一个,故能用上缓存了
以上所述是小编给大家介绍的spring 整合mybatis后用不上session缓存的原因分析,希望对大家有所帮助,如果大家有任何疑问请给我留言,小编会及时回复大家的。在此也非常感谢大家对服务器之家网站的支持!