Few records are going to error due to the following error 6705
as the source have many special character like (îù a¯z’ÇÅÿ )
由于以下错误6705,很少有记录会出错,因为源有许多特殊字符,如(îùa¯z'ÇÅÿ)
6705 An illegally formed character string was encountered during translation.
6705翻译期间遇到非法形成的字符串。
All basic set up is good:
所有基本设置都很好:
- Source and target have the same Unicode data set
- 源和目标具有相同的Unicode数据集
- Both Source and TGT have the UTF encoding
- Source和TGT都有UTF编码
- odbc.ini for sql server has the required code page (106)
- 用于sql server的odbc.ini具有所需的代码页(106)
Questions:
问题:
- is their any entry for TPT to check in any file?
- 他们是TPT签入任何文件的任何条目吗?
- any way to convert all special character to recognized teradata value
- 任何方式将所有特殊字符转换为公认的teradata值
- any other inputs?
- 任何其他输入?
1 个解决方案
#1
0
It looks like internal Teradata problem, not related to either SQL Server nor Informatica, please compare: https://www.info.teradata.com/HTMLPubs/DB_TTU_13_10/index.html#page/General_Reference/B035_1096_109A/Database.05.2268.html.
它看起来像内部Teradata问题,与SQL Server和Informatica无关,请比较:https://www.info.teradata.com/HTMLPubs/DB_TTU_13_10/index.html#page/General_Reference/B035_1096_109A/Database.05.2268.html 。
It should not be caused just by Unicode characters within your data. I don't think this is the problem. But perhaps one of those:
它不应仅由数据中的Unicode字符引起。我不认为这是问题所在。但也许其中一个:
A SO is followed by MBCs, then the end of the string.
A SO is followed by SBCs, before encountering a shift-in (SI).
Can you try to verify this and provide some more details?
您可以尝试验证这一点并提供更多详细信息吗?
#1
0
It looks like internal Teradata problem, not related to either SQL Server nor Informatica, please compare: https://www.info.teradata.com/HTMLPubs/DB_TTU_13_10/index.html#page/General_Reference/B035_1096_109A/Database.05.2268.html.
它看起来像内部Teradata问题,与SQL Server和Informatica无关,请比较:https://www.info.teradata.com/HTMLPubs/DB_TTU_13_10/index.html#page/General_Reference/B035_1096_109A/Database.05.2268.html 。
It should not be caused just by Unicode characters within your data. I don't think this is the problem. But perhaps one of those:
它不应仅由数据中的Unicode字符引起。我不认为这是问题所在。但也许其中一个:
A SO is followed by MBCs, then the end of the string.
A SO is followed by SBCs, before encountering a shift-in (SI).
Can you try to verify this and provide some more details?
您可以尝试验证这一点并提供更多详细信息吗?