In this code I want to increment index
to put it to each yield
ing result.
在这段代码中,我想增加索引以将它放到每个让步的结果中。
var index=0
for(str <- splitToStrings(text) ) yield {
if (index != 0) index += 1 // but index is equal to `0` all the time
new Word(str, UNKNOWN_FORM, index )
}
Why I can not change index
? And what the best way to implement this logic then, trying to be concise?
为什么我不能改变指数?那么实现这种逻辑的最佳方法是什么,试图简洁?
4 个解决方案
#1
22
The zipWithIndex
method on most sequence-like collections will give you a zero-based index, incrementing with each element:
大多数类似序列的集合上的zipWithIndex方法将为您提供从零开始的索引,并随每个元素递增:
for ((str, index) <- splitToStrings(text).zipWithIndex)
yield new Word(str, UNKNOWN_FORM, index)
#2
6
Because initially index is set to 0, thus your condition index != 0
is never executes to true and index is never got incremented. Maybe you don't need this condition? Maybe you can count results afterwards? Now I see that index is used within loop. Then you have to either use @BenJames answer or go recursive.
因为最初索引设置为0,因此您的条件索引!= 0永远不会执行为true,索引永远不会递增。也许你不需要这个条件?也许你可以计算结果呢?现在我看到索引在循环中使用。然后你必须使用@BenJames答案或递归。
#3
3
zipWithIndex
will copy and create a new collection, so better make it lazy when the collection is potentially large
zipWithIndex将复制并创建一个新集合,因此当集合可能很大时,最好使其变得懒惰
for ((str, index) <- splitToStrings(text).view.zipWithIndex)
yield new Word(str, UNKNOWN_FORM, index)
In fact, if you are working with an indexed sequence, then a more efficient way is to use indices
, which produces the range of all indices of this sequence.
事实上,如果您正在使用索引序列,那么更有效的方法是使用索引,它生成此序列的所有索引的范围。
val strs = splitToStrings(text)
for(i <- strs.indices) yield {
new Word(strs(i), UNKNOWN_FORM, i )
}
#4
1
splitToStrings(text).foldLeft(0,List[Word]){(a,b) => {
if(a._1!=0) (a._1+1,new Word(str, UNKNOWN_FORM, index) :: b)
else (a._1,new Word(str, UNKNOWN_FORM, index) :: b)
}}
I am using foldLeft
here with a tuple as: starting base with index = 0
and an empty List
. I then iterate over each element.
我在这里使用foldLeft和一个元组:起始基数索引= 0和一个空列表。然后我迭代每个元素。
Above a
is this tuple. I check the index
value and increment it. Else I dont add the index
. And I add the new Word
to the list.
高于a就是这个元组。我检查索引值并递增它。否则我不添加索引。然后我将新Word添加到列表中。
Ultimately in the end you get a tuple containing the index value and the total List containing all Words.
最终,你得到一个包含索引值的元组和包含所有单词的总List。
#1
22
The zipWithIndex
method on most sequence-like collections will give you a zero-based index, incrementing with each element:
大多数类似序列的集合上的zipWithIndex方法将为您提供从零开始的索引,并随每个元素递增:
for ((str, index) <- splitToStrings(text).zipWithIndex)
yield new Word(str, UNKNOWN_FORM, index)
#2
6
Because initially index is set to 0, thus your condition index != 0
is never executes to true and index is never got incremented. Maybe you don't need this condition? Maybe you can count results afterwards? Now I see that index is used within loop. Then you have to either use @BenJames answer or go recursive.
因为最初索引设置为0,因此您的条件索引!= 0永远不会执行为true,索引永远不会递增。也许你不需要这个条件?也许你可以计算结果呢?现在我看到索引在循环中使用。然后你必须使用@BenJames答案或递归。
#3
3
zipWithIndex
will copy and create a new collection, so better make it lazy when the collection is potentially large
zipWithIndex将复制并创建一个新集合,因此当集合可能很大时,最好使其变得懒惰
for ((str, index) <- splitToStrings(text).view.zipWithIndex)
yield new Word(str, UNKNOWN_FORM, index)
In fact, if you are working with an indexed sequence, then a more efficient way is to use indices
, which produces the range of all indices of this sequence.
事实上,如果您正在使用索引序列,那么更有效的方法是使用索引,它生成此序列的所有索引的范围。
val strs = splitToStrings(text)
for(i <- strs.indices) yield {
new Word(strs(i), UNKNOWN_FORM, i )
}
#4
1
splitToStrings(text).foldLeft(0,List[Word]){(a,b) => {
if(a._1!=0) (a._1+1,new Word(str, UNKNOWN_FORM, index) :: b)
else (a._1,new Word(str, UNKNOWN_FORM, index) :: b)
}}
I am using foldLeft
here with a tuple as: starting base with index = 0
and an empty List
. I then iterate over each element.
我在这里使用foldLeft和一个元组:起始基数索引= 0和一个空列表。然后我迭代每个元素。
Above a
is this tuple. I check the index
value and increment it. Else I dont add the index
. And I add the new Word
to the list.
高于a就是这个元组。我检查索引值并递增它。否则我不添加索引。然后我将新Word添加到列表中。
Ultimately in the end you get a tuple containing the index value and the total List containing all Words.
最终,你得到一个包含索引值的元组和包含所有单词的总List。