By everything I read in the docs, both Django and py-sqlite3 should be fine with threaded access. (Right?) But this code snippet fails for me. The operations in the main thread work, but not in the thread(s) I create. There I get:
通过我在文档中阅读的所有内容,Django和py-sqlite3都可以使用线程访问。 (对吗?)但是这段代码片段对我失败了。主线程中的操作有效,但不在我创建的线程中。在那里我得到:
File "C:\Python27\lib\site-packages\django-1.9-py2.7.egg\django\db\backends\sq lite3\base.py", line 323, in execute return Database.Cursor.execute(self, query, params)
文件“C:\ Python27 \ lib \ site-packages \ django-1.9-py2.7.egg \ django \ db \ backends \ sq lite3 \ base.py”,第323行,在执行返回Database.Cursor.execute(self ,查询,参数)
OperationalError: no such table: thrtest_mymodel
OperationalError:没有这样的表:thrtest_mymodel
What's the problem?
有什么问题?
How do I go about tracking down exactly what's happening to patch Django or whatever's necessary to fix it? The point of failure in Django is pretty indimidating. I can't tell how to see what tables it DOES see, or what differences to look for between main and other threads.
我如何准确地追踪修补Django的正在发生的事情或修复它的必要性? Django的失败点非常难以理解。我不知道如何查看它看到的表,或主要线程和其他线程之间要查找的差异。
from django.db import models
# Super-simple model
class MyModel(models.Model):
message = models.CharField('Message', max_length=200, blank=True)
#Test
from django.test import TestCase
import time
import threading
import random
done = threading.Event()
nThreads = 1
def InsertRec(msg):
rec = MyModel.objects.create(message=msg)
rec.save()
def InsertThread():
try:
msgNum = 1
thrName = threading.currentThread().name
print 'Starting %s' % thrName
while not done.wait(random.random() * 0.1):
msgNum += 1
msg = '%s: %d' % (thrName, msgNum)
print msg
InsertRec(msg)
finally:
done.set()
pass
class ThreadTestRun(TestCase):
def testRunIt(self):
nThisThread = 10
msgSet = set()
for x in xrange(nThisThread):
msg = 'Some message %d' % x
InsertRec(msg) # From main thread: works!
msgSet.add(msg)
self.assertEqual(MyModel.objects.count(), nThisThread)
# We use sets because .all() doesn't preserve the original order.
self.assertEqual(msgSet, set([r.message for r in MyModel.objects.all()]))
thrSet = set()
for thrNum in xrange(nThreads):
t = threading.Thread(name='Thread %d' % thrNum, target=InsertThread)
t.start()
thrSet.add(t)
done.wait(10.)
done.set()
for t in thrSet:
t.join()
Update: Here is DATABASES from settings.py:
更新:这是来自settings.py的DATABASES:
DATABASES = {
'default': {
'ENGINE': 'django.db.backends.sqlite3',
'NAME': ':memory:', # os.path.join(BASE_DIR, 'db.sqlite3'),
'TEST_NAME' : ':memory:',
},
}
Update: With respect to Django's ticket #12118, I get the same symptoms using ':memory:'
or a disk file (for TEST_NAME
).
更新:关于Django的票#12118,我使用':memory:'或磁盘文件(对于TEST_NAME)得到相同的症状。
Django 1.9, Python 2.7.11. (Same symptoms in Django 1.6.)
Django 1.9,Python 2.7.11。 (Django 1.6中的症状相同。)
1 个解决方案
#1
3
Change your DATABASES
like this:
像这样更改您的DATABASES:
DATABASES = {
'default': {
'ENGINE': 'django.db.backends.sqlite3',
'NAME': ':memory:',
'TEST' :
{
'NAME': 'test_db',
}
},
}
This will force django to create a real sqlite db on the disk, instead of creating it in memory.
这将迫使django在磁盘上创建一个真正的sqlite db,而不是在内存中创建它。
Also be sure to inherit your test cases related to threading from django.test.testcases.TransactionTestCase
. If you don't do so, the threads won't see database changes made from another threads.
还要确保从django.test.testcases.TransactionTestCase继承与线程相关的测试用例。如果不这样做,线程将不会看到从其他线程进行的数据库更改。
#1
3
Change your DATABASES
like this:
像这样更改您的DATABASES:
DATABASES = {
'default': {
'ENGINE': 'django.db.backends.sqlite3',
'NAME': ':memory:',
'TEST' :
{
'NAME': 'test_db',
}
},
}
This will force django to create a real sqlite db on the disk, instead of creating it in memory.
这将迫使django在磁盘上创建一个真正的sqlite db,而不是在内存中创建它。
Also be sure to inherit your test cases related to threading from django.test.testcases.TransactionTestCase
. If you don't do so, the threads won't see database changes made from another threads.
还要确保从django.test.testcases.TransactionTestCase继承与线程相关的测试用例。如果不这样做,线程将不会看到从其他线程进行的数据库更改。