This question already has an answer here:
这个问题已经有了答案:
- Split string every nth character? 22 answers
- 分割字符串每个第n个字符?22日答案
I have a string, which I need to split into 2-letter pieces. For example, 'ABCDXY'
should become ['AB', 'CD', 'XY']
. The behavior in the case of odd number of characters may be entirely arbitrary (I'll check the length in advance).
我有一个字符串,我需要把它分成两个字母。例如,“ABCDXY”应该变成“AB”、“CD”、“XY”。奇数字符的情况下的行为可能完全是任意的(我将提前检查长度)。
Is there any way to do this without an ugly loop?
有没有什么方法可以做到这一点而不产生一个丑陋的循环?
6 个解决方案
#1
18
>>> [s[i:i + 2] for i in range(0, len(s), 2)]
['AB', 'CD', 'XY']
#2
16
Using regular expressions!
使用正则表达式!
>>> import re
>>> s = "ABCDXYv"
>>> re.findall(r'.{1,2}',s,re.DOTALL)
['AB', 'CD', 'XY', 'v']
I know it has been a while, but I came back to this and was curious about which method was better; mine: r'.{1,2}'
or Jon's r'..?'
. On the surface, Jon's looks much nicer, and I thought it would be much faster than mine, but I was surprised to find otherwise, so I thought I would share:
我知道已经有一段时间了,但我回到这个问题上,我很好奇哪种方法更好;我:r’。{ 1,2 }”或乔恩的r . . ?”。从表面上看,琼恩的脸色看起来好多了,我想这比我的要快得多,但我很惊讶地发现,原来是这样的,所以我想我应该分享一下:
>>> import timeit
>>> timeit.Timer("re.findall(r'.{1,2}', 'ABCDXYv')", setup='import re').repeat()
[1.9064299485802252, 1.8369554649334674, 1.8548105833383772]
>>> timeit.Timer("re.findall(r'..?', 'ABCDXYv')", setup='import re').repeat()
[1.9142223469651611, 1.8670038395145383, 1.85781945659771]
Which shows that indeed r'.{1,2}'
is the better/faster choice. (But only slightly)
这显示了r'{1,2}是更好的/更快的选择。(但仅略)
#3
2
You could try:
你可以试试:
s = 'ABCDEFG'
r = [s[i:i+2] for i in xrange(0, len(s), 2)]
# r is ['AB', 'CD', 'EF', 'G']
UPDATE 2
更新2
If you don't care about odd chars, you could use a regex (avoiding the loop):
如果您不关心奇数字符,您可以使用regex(避免循环):
s = 'ABCDEFG'
r = re.compile('(..)').findall(s)
# r is ['AB', 'CD', 'EF']
#4
1
There's nothing ugly about the perfectly Pythonic:
完美的毕达哥拉斯式没有什么不好的:
string = 'ABCDXY'
[string[i:i+2] for i in xrange(0, len(string), 2)]
You could also use the following (from - http://docs.python.org/library/itertools.html):
您还可以使用以下(from - http://docs.python.org/library/itertools.html):
def grouper(n, iterable, fillvalue=None):
"Collect data into fixed-length chunks or blocks"
# grouper(3, 'ABCDEFG', 'x') --> ABC DEF Gxx
args = [iter(iterable)] * n
return izip_longest(fillvalue=fillvalue, *args)
(Which depending how you look at it - may or may not be using 'loops' ;))
(这取决于您如何看待它——可能使用“循环”,也可能不使用;)
or something like:
或者类似的:
re.findall('..?', string)
#5
0
Yet another solution, this one built on zip
and a slice stride:
另一种解决方案是,这个方案建立在zip基础上,并进行了一段大步:
map(''.join, itertools.izip_longest(mystr[::2], mystr[1::2], fillvalue=''))
It does handle odd-length inputs.
它确实处理奇数长度的输入。
#6
0
Here's a yet another solution without explicit loops (though @Emmanuel's answer is the most appropriate for your question):
这里还有一个没有明确循环的解决方案(尽管@Emmanuel的答案最适合你的问题):
s = 'abcdef'
L = zip(s[::2], s[1::2])
# -> [('a', 'b'), ('c', 'd'), ('e', 'f')]
To get strings:
得到字符串:
print map(''.join, L)
# ['ab', 'cd', 'ef']
On Python 3 wrap using list()
where necessary.
在Python 3中,必要时使用list()进行包装。
#1
18
>>> [s[i:i + 2] for i in range(0, len(s), 2)]
['AB', 'CD', 'XY']
#2
16
Using regular expressions!
使用正则表达式!
>>> import re
>>> s = "ABCDXYv"
>>> re.findall(r'.{1,2}',s,re.DOTALL)
['AB', 'CD', 'XY', 'v']
I know it has been a while, but I came back to this and was curious about which method was better; mine: r'.{1,2}'
or Jon's r'..?'
. On the surface, Jon's looks much nicer, and I thought it would be much faster than mine, but I was surprised to find otherwise, so I thought I would share:
我知道已经有一段时间了,但我回到这个问题上,我很好奇哪种方法更好;我:r’。{ 1,2 }”或乔恩的r . . ?”。从表面上看,琼恩的脸色看起来好多了,我想这比我的要快得多,但我很惊讶地发现,原来是这样的,所以我想我应该分享一下:
>>> import timeit
>>> timeit.Timer("re.findall(r'.{1,2}', 'ABCDXYv')", setup='import re').repeat()
[1.9064299485802252, 1.8369554649334674, 1.8548105833383772]
>>> timeit.Timer("re.findall(r'..?', 'ABCDXYv')", setup='import re').repeat()
[1.9142223469651611, 1.8670038395145383, 1.85781945659771]
Which shows that indeed r'.{1,2}'
is the better/faster choice. (But only slightly)
这显示了r'{1,2}是更好的/更快的选择。(但仅略)
#3
2
You could try:
你可以试试:
s = 'ABCDEFG'
r = [s[i:i+2] for i in xrange(0, len(s), 2)]
# r is ['AB', 'CD', 'EF', 'G']
UPDATE 2
更新2
If you don't care about odd chars, you could use a regex (avoiding the loop):
如果您不关心奇数字符,您可以使用regex(避免循环):
s = 'ABCDEFG'
r = re.compile('(..)').findall(s)
# r is ['AB', 'CD', 'EF']
#4
1
There's nothing ugly about the perfectly Pythonic:
完美的毕达哥拉斯式没有什么不好的:
string = 'ABCDXY'
[string[i:i+2] for i in xrange(0, len(string), 2)]
You could also use the following (from - http://docs.python.org/library/itertools.html):
您还可以使用以下(from - http://docs.python.org/library/itertools.html):
def grouper(n, iterable, fillvalue=None):
"Collect data into fixed-length chunks or blocks"
# grouper(3, 'ABCDEFG', 'x') --> ABC DEF Gxx
args = [iter(iterable)] * n
return izip_longest(fillvalue=fillvalue, *args)
(Which depending how you look at it - may or may not be using 'loops' ;))
(这取决于您如何看待它——可能使用“循环”,也可能不使用;)
or something like:
或者类似的:
re.findall('..?', string)
#5
0
Yet another solution, this one built on zip
and a slice stride:
另一种解决方案是,这个方案建立在zip基础上,并进行了一段大步:
map(''.join, itertools.izip_longest(mystr[::2], mystr[1::2], fillvalue=''))
It does handle odd-length inputs.
它确实处理奇数长度的输入。
#6
0
Here's a yet another solution without explicit loops (though @Emmanuel's answer is the most appropriate for your question):
这里还有一个没有明确循环的解决方案(尽管@Emmanuel的答案最适合你的问题):
s = 'abcdef'
L = zip(s[::2], s[1::2])
# -> [('a', 'b'), ('c', 'd'), ('e', 'f')]
To get strings:
得到字符串:
print map(''.join, L)
# ['ab', 'cd', 'ef']
On Python 3 wrap using list()
where necessary.
在Python 3中,必要时使用list()进行包装。