The following are my steps,but it did not work as intended.
以下是我的步骤,但并没有达到预期的效果。
linux-3.16-rc2\arch\x86\lib\memcpy_64.S:
x86 linux - 3.16 - rc2 \拱\ \ lib \ memcpy_64.S:
changed
改变了
ENTRY(__memcpy)
ENTRY(memcpy)
...
CFI_ENDPROC
ENDPROC(memcpy)
ENDPROC(__memcpy)
to:
:
ENTRY(__memcpy)
ENTRY(x86_memcpy)
...
CFI_ENDPROC
ENDPROC(x86_memcpy)
ENDPROC(__memcpy)
linux-3.16-rc2\lib\string.c:
linux - 3.16 - rc2 \ lib \ string.c:
changed
改变了
#ifndef __HAVE_ARCH_MEMCPY
void *memcpy(void *dest, const void *src, size_t count)
{
char *tmp = dest;
const char *s = src;
while (count--)
*tmp++ = *s++;
return dest;
}
#endif
to:
:
//#ifndef __HAVE_ARCH_MEMCPY
void *memcpy(void *dest, const void *src, size_t count)
{
char *tmp = dest;
const char *s = src;
my_hook();
while (count--)
*tmp++ = *s++;
return dest;
}
//#endif
delete EXPORT_SYMBOL(memcpy) in arch/x86/kernel/x8664_ksyms_64.c
删除EXPORT_SYMBOL(memcpy)拱/ x86 /内核/ x8664_ksyms_64.c
add test code in linux-3.16-rc2\mm\memcpy_test.c:
添加测试代码在linux-3.16-rc2\mm\memcpy_test.c:
#include <linux/mm.h>
#include <linux/kallsyms.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
int hook_value = -1;
int test_begin = 0;
void my_test_begin(void)
{
char src[128] = {0};
char dst[128] = {1};
test_begin = 1;
mb();
memcpy((char*)dst,(char*)src,50);
test_begin = 0;
mb();
printk("hook value:%d\n",hook_value);
}
void my_hook(void)
{
if(test_begin)
hook_value=1;
}
After invoke my_test_begin, I found hook_value remained -1, it seems that memcpy in my_test_begin has never reached hook_value=1 can anyone help? thx!
在调用my_test_begin之后,我发现hook_value仍然是-1,似乎my_test_begin中的memcpy从未达到hook_value=1,有人能帮忙吗?谢谢!
1 个解决方案
#1
0
thanks to @Basile Starynkevitch I solve the problem, yes, 'Sometimes, the compiler is optimizing memcpy to __builtin_memcpy'
感谢@Basile Starynkevitch我解决了这个问题,是的,“有时,编译器正在优化memcpy以__builtin_memcpy”
#1
0
thanks to @Basile Starynkevitch I solve the problem, yes, 'Sometimes, the compiler is optimizing memcpy to __builtin_memcpy'
感谢@Basile Starynkevitch我解决了这个问题,是的,“有时,编译器正在优化memcpy以__builtin_memcpy”