Say I've got an array of User
:
说我有一个用户数组:
class User : IUserDowngraded
{
public Int32 Id { get; set; }
}
... with downgraded functionality done by casting the objects to a specific interface:
...通过将对象强制转换为特定接口来完成降级功能:
interface IUserDowngraded
{
Int32 Id { get; } // removes set functionality from property
}
... how would I cast those downgraded objects (IUserDowngraded
) to User
objects in a single line of code, using LINQ?
What I'm trying to avoid is this:
...如何使用LINQ将这些降级的对象(IUserDowngraded)转换为单行代码中的User对象?我想避免的是:
// pseudo-code alert:
IUserDowngraded[] downgradedUsers { IUserDowngraded, IUserDowngraded, ... };
var upgradedUsers = new User[downgradedUsers.Count()];
Int32 i = 0;
foreach (IUserDowngraded du in downgradedUsers)
{
upgradedUsers[i] = (User)user;
i++;
}
3 个解决方案
#1
var upgradedUsers = downgradedUsers.Cast<User>();
Append a call to ToArray()
if you want upgradedUsers
as an array, of course.
当然,如果你想将升级的用户作为数组,请附加对ToArray()的调用。
#2
使用演员方法....
SampleIntList = SampleStringList.Cast<int>().Select(x => Convert.ToInt32(x)).ToList();
#3
Also any of Implicit operators, Linq and Lambda expressions can make code less readable. But what is more readable? methods should work.
任何Implicit运算符,Linq和Lambda表达式都会使代码的可读性降低。但更具可读性的是什么?方法应该有效。
#1
var upgradedUsers = downgradedUsers.Cast<User>();
Append a call to ToArray()
if you want upgradedUsers
as an array, of course.
当然,如果你想将升级的用户作为数组,请附加对ToArray()的调用。
#2
使用演员方法....
SampleIntList = SampleStringList.Cast<int>().Select(x => Convert.ToInt32(x)).ToList();
#3
Also any of Implicit operators, Linq and Lambda expressions can make code less readable. But what is more readable? methods should work.
任何Implicit运算符,Linq和Lambda表达式都会使代码的可读性降低。但更具可读性的是什么?方法应该有效。