I've got a thread that's polling a piece of hardware.
我有一个线程正在轮询一块硬件。
while not hardware_is_ready():
pass
process_data_from_hardware()
But there are other threads (and processes!) that might have things to do. If so, I don't want to burn up cpu checking the hardware every other instruction. It's been a while since I've dealt with threading, and when I did it wasn't Python, but I believe most threading libraries have a yield
function or something that allows a thread to tell the scheduler "Give the other threads a chance."
但是还有其他线程(和进程!)可能有事情要做。如果是这样,我不希望每次其他指令都烧掉cpu检查硬件。自从我处理线程以来已经有一段时间了,当我这样做时,它不是Python,但我相信大多数线程库都有一个yield函数或允许线程告诉调度程序的东西“给其他线程一个机会。 “
while not hardware_is_ready():
threading.yield() # This function doesn't exist.
process_data_from_hardware()
But I can't find any reference to something like this in the threading documentation. Python does have a yield
statement, but I'm pretty sure that's something else entirely (to do with generators).
但我在线程文档中找不到任何类似的引用。 Python确实有一个yield语句,但我很确定这完全是另一回事(与生成器有关)。
What's the correct thing to do here?
在这做什么是正确的?
3 个解决方案
#1
61
time.sleep(0)
is sufficient to yield control -- no need to use a positive epsilon. Indeed, time.sleep(0)
MEANS "yield to whatever other thread may be ready".
time.sleep(0)足以产生控制 - 不需要使用正epsilon。实际上,time.sleep(0)意味着“屈服于任何其他线程可能已准备就绪”。
#2
12
Read up on the Global Interpreter Lock (GIL).
阅读Global Interpreter Lock(GIL)。
For example: http://jessenoller.com/2009/02/01/python-threads-and-the-global-interpreter-lock/
例如:http://jessenoller.com/2009/02/01/python-threads-and-the-global-interpreter-lock/
Also: http://www.pyzine.com/Issue001/Section_Articles/article_ThreadingGlobalInterpreter.html
另外:http://www.pyzine.com/Issue001/Section_Articles/article_ThreadingGlobalInterpreter.html
Do this in your code if you must do Busy Waiting (e.g. polling a device).
如果您必须执行忙等待(例如,轮询设备),请在代码中执行此操作。
time.sleep( 0.0001 )
This will yield to the thread scheduler.
这将产生线程调度程序。
Also, I collected some notes and references in http://homepage.mac.com/s_lott/iblog/architecture/C551260341/E20081031204203/index.html
另外,我在http://homepage.mac.com/s_lott/iblog/architecture/C551260341/E20081031204203/index.html收集了一些说明和参考资料。
#3
#1
61
time.sleep(0)
is sufficient to yield control -- no need to use a positive epsilon. Indeed, time.sleep(0)
MEANS "yield to whatever other thread may be ready".
time.sleep(0)足以产生控制 - 不需要使用正epsilon。实际上,time.sleep(0)意味着“屈服于任何其他线程可能已准备就绪”。
#2
12
Read up on the Global Interpreter Lock (GIL).
阅读Global Interpreter Lock(GIL)。
For example: http://jessenoller.com/2009/02/01/python-threads-and-the-global-interpreter-lock/
例如:http://jessenoller.com/2009/02/01/python-threads-and-the-global-interpreter-lock/
Also: http://www.pyzine.com/Issue001/Section_Articles/article_ThreadingGlobalInterpreter.html
另外:http://www.pyzine.com/Issue001/Section_Articles/article_ThreadingGlobalInterpreter.html
Do this in your code if you must do Busy Waiting (e.g. polling a device).
如果您必须执行忙等待(例如,轮询设备),请在代码中执行此操作。
time.sleep( 0.0001 )
This will yield to the thread scheduler.
这将产生线程调度程序。
Also, I collected some notes and references in http://homepage.mac.com/s_lott/iblog/architecture/C551260341/E20081031204203/index.html
另外,我在http://homepage.mac.com/s_lott/iblog/architecture/C551260341/E20081031204203/index.html收集了一些说明和参考资料。