I am pushing elements to an array based on a condition as explained here http://2ality.com/2017/04/conditional-literal-entries.html
我正在根据这里解释的条件将元素推送到数组中http://2ality.com/2017/04/conditional-literal-entries.html
const arr = [
...(cond ? ['a'] : []),
'b',
];
Now, this works fine, but when I try
现在,这很好,但是当我尝试时
const arr = [
...(cond && ['a']),
'b',
];
instead, it stops working.
相反,它停止工作。
I would like to know why it's not working anymore, and if there is a way to conditionally push using spread operator and && instead of ?.
我想知道为什么它不再工作了,如果有条件推动使用spread运算符和&&而不是?
Thank you
2 个解决方案
#1
2
No, it is not possible, because all iterable objects are truthy.
不,这是不可能的,因为所有可迭代的对象都是真实的。
If cond
is falsey, you have a value which is not spreadable by Symbol.iterator
如果cond为false,则表示您具有Symbol.iterator无法传播的值
The built-in types with a @@iterator method are:
带@@ iterator方法的内置类型是:
var cond = false;
const arr = [
...(cond && ['a']), // throws error, function expected
'b',
];
console.log(arr);
#2
1
Yes, it's possible. But maybe that's an overkill that performs worse and decreases the readability.
是的,这是可能的。但也许这是一种过度杀伤,表现更差并降低了可读性。
const arr = [];
arr.push(...[false && 'nope'].filter(v => v));
arr.push(...[true && 'yep'].filter(v => v));
arr.push(...[false && 'no', true && 'yes'].filter(v => v));
console.info(arr);
As @Nina Scholz indicated an iterable is required for spread operator to work. By using a second array (which may be empty) we can eventually reach the following state (arr.push()
).
正如@Nina Scholz所说,扩展运算符需要迭代才能工作。通过使用第二个数组(可能为空),我们最终可以达到以下状态(arr.push())。
#1
2
No, it is not possible, because all iterable objects are truthy.
不,这是不可能的,因为所有可迭代的对象都是真实的。
If cond
is falsey, you have a value which is not spreadable by Symbol.iterator
如果cond为false,则表示您具有Symbol.iterator无法传播的值
The built-in types with a @@iterator method are:
带@@ iterator方法的内置类型是:
var cond = false;
const arr = [
...(cond && ['a']), // throws error, function expected
'b',
];
console.log(arr);
#2
1
Yes, it's possible. But maybe that's an overkill that performs worse and decreases the readability.
是的,这是可能的。但也许这是一种过度杀伤,表现更差并降低了可读性。
const arr = [];
arr.push(...[false && 'nope'].filter(v => v));
arr.push(...[true && 'yep'].filter(v => v));
arr.push(...[false && 'no', true && 'yes'].filter(v => v));
console.info(arr);
As @Nina Scholz indicated an iterable is required for spread operator to work. By using a second array (which may be empty) we can eventually reach the following state (arr.push()
).
正如@Nina Scholz所说,扩展运算符需要迭代才能工作。通过使用第二个数组(可能为空),我们最终可以达到以下状态(arr.push())。