If I do this:
如果我这样做:
output = %x{some_script}
...then I have the stuff printed to stdout stored in output
; but I don't see it appear on the screen.
...然后我将打印到stdout的东西存储在输出中;但我没有看到它出现在屏幕上。
On the other hand, if I do this:
另一方面,如果我这样做:
success = system "some_script"
...then I see the output appear on the screen, but I don't have it stored in a variable (success
just holds a boolean value).
...然后我看到输出出现在屏幕上,但我没有将它存储在变量中(成功只保留一个布尔值)。
Is there some way to get both? I'm aware I could do this:
有两种方法可以得到两者吗?我知道我可以这样做:
output = %x{some_script}
puts output
But the problem there is that some_script
might be a pretty long-running script, in which case I see nothing until the whole thing is finished. I'd prefer to see output as it's produced, and when it's finished to have it all stored in the output
variable.
但问题是some_script可能是一个非常长时间运行的脚本,在这种情况下,在整个事情完成之前我什么都看不见。我更愿意看到它产生的输出,以及它完成时将它全部存储在输出变量中。
2 个解决方案
#1
8
This is a solution with IO.popen
:
这是IO.popen的解决方案:
require 'stringio'
output = StringIO.new
IO.popen("ls") do |pipe|
pipe.each do |line|
output.puts line
puts line
end
end
puts output.string # => Outputs the contents of `output` as a string
#2
1
You could monkeypatch Kernel::puts
, but I can only think of a kludgy global way to store the results:
你可以monkeypatch Kernel :: puts,但我只能想到一种存储结果的kludgy全局方式:
class Kernel
alias_method :old_puts, :puts
def puts(*args)
old_puts args
$output << args
end
end
#1
8
This is a solution with IO.popen
:
这是IO.popen的解决方案:
require 'stringio'
output = StringIO.new
IO.popen("ls") do |pipe|
pipe.each do |line|
output.puts line
puts line
end
end
puts output.string # => Outputs the contents of `output` as a string
#2
1
You could monkeypatch Kernel::puts
, but I can only think of a kludgy global way to store the results:
你可以monkeypatch Kernel :: puts,但我只能想到一种存储结果的kludgy全局方式:
class Kernel
alias_method :old_puts, :puts
def puts(*args)
old_puts args
$output << args
end
end